Rehabilitation in the new machine? Exploring drug and alcohol use and variables related to success among DUI offenders under electronic monitoring - Some preliminary outcome results

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 293-311

  Courtright, Kevin E ^a   Berg, Bruce L ^b   Mutchnick, Robert J ^c  

^a NIAGARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELINQUENCY; DRUG USE; DRUNKEN DRIVING; ELECTRONICS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; OFFENDER; PRISON; PROBATION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034122759     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X00443004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hodge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2. Anglin, M. D., & Speckart, G. (1988). Narcotics use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology, 26, 197-231.
3. Baumer, T. L., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1990). Final report - the electronic monitoring of non-violent convicted felons: An experiment in home detention (86-IJ-CX-0041). Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
4. Baumer, T. L., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1992). Electronically monitored home confinement: Does it work? In J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 54-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Beck, A. J., & Shipley, B. E. (1989). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983 (NCJ-116261). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
6. Berry, B. (1985). Electronic jails: A new criminal justice concern. Justice Quarterly. 2, 1-22.
7. Blalock, H. M. (1979). Social statistics (Rev. 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Blomberg, T., Waldo, G. P., & Burcroff, L. C. (1987). Home confinement and electronic surveillance, In B. R. McCarthy (Ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance (pp. 169-179). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
9. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 332-346.
10. Byrne, J. M., Lurigio, A. J., & Baird, S. C. (1989). The effectiveness of the new intensive supervision programs [Monograph]. Research in Corrections, 2(2).
11. Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. New York: Rinehart.
12. Cole, G. F. (1992). The American system of criminal justice (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. Corbett, R., & Marx, G. T. (1991). Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8, 359-414.
14. County Intermediate Punishment Act, 1990-193, S. B. No. 718 (1990).
15. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997a). The cost effectiveness of using house arrest with electronic monitoring for drunk drivers. Federal Probation, 61(3), 19-22.
16. Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997b). Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24(3/4), 35-51.
17. Flowers, R. B. (1989). Demographics and criminality: The characteristics of crime in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
18. Glaser, D. (1964). The effectiveness of aprison and parole system. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
19. Irwin, J., & Austin, J. (1997). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20. Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1992). Drug treatment and electronically monitored home confinement: An evaluation of a community-based sentencing option. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 158-170.
21. Klein-Saffran, J. (1992). Electronic monitoring versus halfway houses: A study of federal offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
22. Kuhar, M. J. (1991). Western County intermediate punishment plan. Western, PA: Western County Probation Department.
23. Landis, J. R., Mercer, J. D., & Wolff, C. E. (1969). Success and failure of adult probationers in California. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 6, 34-60.
24. Langan, P. A., & Cunnif, M. A. (1992). Recidivism of felons on probation, 1986-89. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & McMullen, J. (1993). Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternative. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 462-484.
26. Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, G. D., & Smith, R. C. (1992). The Pride, Inc., program: An evaluation of 5 years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation, 56(4), 42-47.
27. McCarthy, B. R., & McCarthy, B. J. (1997). Community-based corrections (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28. Morgan, K. D. (1993). Factors influencing probation outcome: A review of the literature. Federal Probation, 57(2), 23-29.
29. Morgan, K. D. (1994). Factors associated with probation outcome. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 341-353.
30. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Nochajski, T. H., Bell, J. A., & Augustino, D. K. (1995, August). Impact of treatment on DWI offenders: A 10 yearfollow-up. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety, Adelaide, Australia.
32. Nochajski, T. H., Miller, B. A., Wieczorek, W. F., & Whitney, R. (1993). The effects of a drinker-driver treatment program: Does criminal history make a difference? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 174-189.
33. Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for windows: Base system user's guide-release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
34. Orsagh, T., & Chen, J. (1988). The effect of time served on recidivism: An interdisciplinary theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 155-171.
35. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Intensive supervision for high risk probationers. SantaMonica, CA: RAND.
36. Renzema, M., & Skelton, D. (1990). The use of electronic monitoring by criminal justice agencies 1989. Kutztown, PA: Kutztown University Foundation.
37. Roundtree, G. A., Edwards, D. W., & Parker, J. B. (1984). A study of the personal characteristics of probationers as related to recidivism. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 8(3), 53-61.
38. Smith, L. G. (1990). Recidivism, community control, and imprisonment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
39. Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology (11th ed.). New York: General Hall, Inc.
40. Sykes, G. M., & Cullen, F. (1992). Criminology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
41. Vehicles Law of Pennsylvania, 75 Pa. C.S.A. § 3731 (1994).
42. Wish, E., & Johnson, B. (1986). The impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and career criminals (pp. 52-88). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.