Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 61-75

  Bonta, James ^a   Wallace Capretta, Suzanne ^a   Rooney, Jennifer ^b  

^a Solicitor General Canada   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844454868     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128700046001004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andrews, D. A. and James Bonta. 1995. The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
2. _. 1998. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 2nd ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Ball, Richard A., Ronald C. Huff, and Robert J. Lilly. 1988. House Arrest and Correctional Policy: Doing Time at Home. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Ball, Richard A. and Robert J. Lilly. 1986. "A Theoretical Examination of Home Incarceration." Federal Probation 50:17-24.
5. Baumer, Terry L., Michael G. Maxfield, and Robert I. Mendelsohn. 1993. "A Comparative Analysis of Three Electronically Monitored Home Detention Programs." Justice Quarterly 10:121-42.
6. Beck, James, Jody Klein-Saffran, and Harold B. Wooten. 1990. "Home Confinement and the Use of Electronic Monitoring With Federal Parolees." Federal Probation 54:22-31.
7. Bonta, James and Paul Gendreau. 1992. "Coping With Prison." Pp. 343-354 in Psychology and Social Policy, edited by P. Suedfeld and P. E. Tetlock. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
8. Bonta, James, Suzanne Wallace-Capretta, and Jennifer Rooney. Forthcoming. "A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of an Intensive Rehabilitation Program." Criminal Justice and Behavior.
9. Cadigan, Timothy P. 1991. "Electronic Monitoring in Federal Pretrial Release." Federal Probation 55:26-30.
10. Cullen, Francis T., Faith E. Lutze, Bruce G. Link, and Nancy T. Wolfe. 1989. "The Correctional Orientation of Prison Guards: Do Officers Support Rehabilitation?" Federal Probation 53:33-42.
11. Cullen, Francis. T., John P. Wright, and Brandon K. Applegate. 1996. "Control in the Community: The Limits of Reform?" Pp. 69-116 in Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply, edited by A. T. Harland. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Denton, M. 1988. Statistical Report (Dec.). Harper Woods, Michigan. Described in A. K. Schmidt, Electronic Monitoring in the United States. United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, Chicago: Nelson Hall.
13. Doherty, Diana. 1995. "Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family." Pp. 129-39 in Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, the Operation, the Research, edited by K. Schulz. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
14. Fox, Richard G. 1987. "Dr. Schwitzgebel's Machine Revisited: Electronic Monitoring of Offenders." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 20:131-47.
15. Friel, Charles M. and Joseph B. Vaughn. 1986. "A Consumer's Guide to the Electronic Monitoring of Probationers." Federal Probation 50:3-14.
16. Gendreau, Paul and Claire Goggin. 1996. "Principles of Effective Correctional Programming." Forum on Corrections Research 8:38-41.
17. Lilly, Robert J., Richard A. Ball, G. David Curry, and John McMullen. 1993. "Electronic Monitoring of the Drunk Driver: A Seven-Year Study of the Home Confinement Alternative." Crime & Delinquency 39:462-84.
18. Mainprize, Stephen. 1992. "Electronic Monitoring in Corrections: Assessing Cost Effectiveness and the Potential for Widening the Threat of Social Control." Canadian Journal of Criminology 34:161-80.
19. Maxfield, Michael G. and Terry L. Baumer. 1990. "Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring: Comparing Pretrial and Postconviction Programs." Crime & Delinquency 36:521-36.
20. Mortimer, Ed and Chris May. 1997. Electronic Monitoring in Practice: The Second Year of the Trials of Curfew Orders. London, UK: Home Office.
21. Motiuk, Michelle S., Laurence L. Motiuk, and James Bonta. 1992. "A Comparison Between Self-Report and Interview-Based Inventories in Offender Classification." Criminal Justice and Behavior 19:143-59.
22. Ontario. 1991. An Evaluation of the Electronic Monitoring Pilot Project: Mimico Correctional Centre, April, 1989-October. 1990. North Bay, Canada: Ministry of Correctional Services of Ontario.
23. Petersilia, Joan. 1986. "Exploring the Option of House Arrest." Federal Probation 50:50-5.
24. Rogers, Robert and Anntee Jolin. 1989. "Electronic Monitoring: A Review of the Empirical Literature." Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 5:141-53.
25. Roy, Sudipto. 1997. "Five Years of Electronic Monitoring of Adults and Juveniles in Lake County, Indiana: A Comparative Study on Factors Related to Failure." Journal of Criminal Justice 20:141-57.
26. Schmidt, Annesley K. 1998. "Electronic Monitoring: What Does the Literature Tell Us?" Federal Probation 62:10-9.
27. Whitefield, Dick. 1999. "Electronic Monitoring in Europe: A Conference Report." The Journal of Offender Monitoring 12:15, 18-9.
28. Whittington, M. 1987. Supervised Electronic Confinement Pilot Program October 1986-September 1987: Final Report. Santa Ana, CA: Orange County Probation Department.