Electron Transfer and Dynamic Infrared-Band Coalescence: It Looks Like Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy, but a Billion Times Faster

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 24, 2003, Pages 5962-5969

  Londergan, Casey H ^a   Kubiak, Clifford P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster compounds; Electron transfer; IR spectroscopy; Mixed valent compounds; Solvent effects

Indexed keywords

BAND STRUCTURE; CHARGE TRANSFER; ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; INFRARED RADIATION; ISOMERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RELAXATION PROCESSES; RUTHENIUM; TRANSITION METALS;

ELECTRON DONOR SITES; VALENCE COMPLEXES;

COALESCENCE;

CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; METAL COMPLEX; RUTHENIUM DERIVATIVE;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DYNAMICS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; INFRARED RADIATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; ISOMERISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; THEORY;

EID: 0347362650     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200305028     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. J. Sandstrom, Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
2. "High-Resolution Infrared Studies of Site Structure and Dynamics for Matrix Isolated Molecules" B. I. Swanson, L. H. Jones, Vibrational Spectra and Structure, Vol. 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983.
3. B. Cohen, S. Weiss, J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 87, 3606-3610.
4. B. Cohen, S. Weiss, J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 88, 3159-3162.
5. C. B. Harris, R. M. Shelby, P. A. Cornelius, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1978, 57, 8-14.
6. R. M. Shelby, C. B. Harris, P. A. Cornelius, J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 70, 34-41.
7. S. Marks, P. A. Cornelius, C. B. Harris, J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 3069-3081.
8. M. M. Kreevoy, C. A. Mead, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 4596-4597.
9. F.-W. Grevels, J. Jacke, W. E. Klotzbücher, Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 960-961; Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 885-887.
10. F.-W. Grevels, J. Jacke, W. E. Klotzbücher, Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 960-961; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 885-887.
11. F.-W. Grevels, J. Jacke, K. Seevogel, J. Mol. Struct. 1988, 174, 107-112.
12. J. J. Turner, F.-W. Grevels, S. M. Howdle, J. Jacke, M. T. Haward, W. E. Klotzbücher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8347-8353.
13. J. J. Turner, C. M. Gordon, S. M. Howdle, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17532-17538.
14. F.-W. Grevels, K. Kerpen, W. E. Klotzbücher, R. E. D. McClung, G. Russell, M. Viotte, K. Schaffner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10423-10433.
15. H. L. Strauss, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 905-907.
16. There has been much discussion (see refs. [37,38] and references therein, and [39] for an original reference) in the literature on the applicability of Bloch equations (the dynamic NMR-like interpretation) to dynamic vibrational band coalescence, and if they do reproduce experimental results, what the ultimate interpretation should be and whether the characteristic "lifetimes" determined from simulation should have a physical interpretation. One conclusion to draw from much of this discussion is that a detailed knowledge of the specific vibrational and "reaction" dynamics of each particular system (including knowledge of the formation of a low-energy transition state) is required for meaningful interpretation of vibrational band shapes, and for this reason accurate density functional or ab initio calculations on molecular systems of interest can be indispensable. See reference [16] for an example of such a study.
17. M. Bühl, W. Thiel, Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 2922-2924.
18. I. S. Zavarine, T. Richmond, C. P. Kubiak, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2, 519-520.
19. R. Wu, S. K. A. Koske, R. P. White, C. E. Anson, U. A. Jayasooriya, R. C. Cannon, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 1657-1658.
20. T. Ito, T. Hamaguchi, H. Nagino, T. Yamaguchi, J. Washington, C. P. Kubiak, Science 1997, 277, 660-663.
21. T. Ito, T. Hamaguchi, H. Nagino, T. Yamaguchi, I. Zavarine, T. Richmond, J. Washington, C. P. Kubiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4625-4632.
22. J. C. Salsman, S. Ronco, C. H. Londergan, C. P. Kubiak, unpublished results.
23. M. L. Horng, J. A. Gardecki, A. Papazyan, M. Maroncelli, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17311-17337.
24. C. H. Londergan, J. C. Salsman, S. Ronco, L. D. Dolkas, C. P. Kubiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6236-6237.
25. N. S. Hush, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 8, 391.
26. R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 966.
27. -1 in all cases. Evidently, matrix isolation experiments similar to those reported for 1 would be valuable for 2-.
28. K. Tominaga, G. C. Walker, T. J. Kang, P. F. Barbara, J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 10485-10492.
29. M. P. Maroncelli, personal communications.
30. N. Imai, T. Yamaguchi, T. Hamaguchi, T. Ito, C. H. Londergan, C. R. Kubiak, Angew. Chem. submitted.
31. C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3988-3989.
32. K. D. Demadis, G. A. Neyhart, E. M. Kober, T. J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7121-7122.
33. K. D. Demadis, G. A. Neyhart, E. M. Kober, T. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 5948-5958.
34. K. Demadis, C.M. Hartshorn, T.J. Meyer, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2655-2685.
35. C. H. Londergan, J. C. Salsman, S. R. Ronco, C. P. Kubiak, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 926-928.
36. L. T. Zhang, J. Ko, M. J. Ondrechen, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3030-3034.
37. C. H. Londergan, R. Rocha, M. G. Brown, C. P. Kubiak, A. P. Shreve, J. Am. Chem. Soc. in press.
38. R. A. Macphail, H. L. Strauss, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 1156-1166.
39. K. A. Wood, H. L. Strauss, J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5677-5684.
40. R. L. Muetterties, Inorg. Chem. 1965, 4, 769-771.
41. I. S. Zavarine, C. P. Kubiak, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 495, 106-109.