Phase structure of (2+1)-dimensional compact lattice gauge theories and the transition from Mott insulator to fractionalized insulator

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 20, 2003, Pages

  Smiseth, J ^a   Smorgrav E ^a   Nogueira, F S ^b   Hove, J ^a   Sudbo A ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHASE TRANSITION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THEORY;

EID: 0347116623     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.205104     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. C. M. Varma, Z. Nussinov, and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 360, 353 (2002).
2. T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000).
3. S. A. Kivelson, Synth. Met. 125, 99 (2002).
4. G. Baskaran, Z. Zou, and P. W. Anderson, Solid State Commun. 63, 973 (1987);
5. G. Kotliar and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 38, 5142 (1988);
6. Phys. Rev. B G. Baskaran and P. W. Anderson, 37, 580 (1988);
7. Phys. Rev. B L. B. Ioffe and A. I. Larkin, 39, 8988 (1989);
8. N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2450 (1990);
9. P. A. Lee and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5621 (1990).
10. I. Ichinose and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 51, 11 860 (1995);
11. Phys. Rev. B I. Ichinose, T. Matsui, and M. Onoda, 64, 104516 (2001).
12. R. B. Laughlin, in Proceedings of the Inauguration Conference of the Asia-Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics, edited by Y. M. Cho, J. B. Hong, and C. N. Yang (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
13. D. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2694 (2000).
14. N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9166 (2000).
15. C. Mudry and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5200 (1994);
16. Phys. Rev. B C. Mudry E. Fradkin 50, 11409 (1994).
17. F. Wegner, J. Math. Phys. 12, 2259 (1971).
18. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991);
19. S. Sachdev and N. Read, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).
20. X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991).
21. Z. Nussinov, J. Zaanen, and A. Sudbø (unpublished).
22. H. Kleinert, F. S. Nogueira, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 232001 (2002).
23. H. Kleinert, F. S. Nogueira, and A. Sudbø, hep-th/0209132 (unpublished).
24. I. F. Herbut and Z. Tes̆anović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4588 (1996).
25. J. Hove and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3426 (2000).
26. A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 429 (1977).
27. A. Sudbø, E. Smørgrav, J. Smiseth, F. S. Nogueira, and J. Hove, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 226403 (2002).
28. M. B. Einhorn and R. Savit, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2583 (1978);
29. Phys. Rev. D M. B. Einhorn R. Savit 19, 1198 (1979).
30. E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979).
31. J. Villain, J. Phys. (France) 36, 581 (1975).
32. c = 1/3, see, e.g., A. K. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 57, 3123 (1998).
33. c = 0.333068(7), see T. Neuhaus, A. Rajantie, and K. Rummukainen, 67, 014525 (2003).
34. C. Borgs and F. Nill, J. Stat. Phys. 47, 877 (1987).
35. M. N. Chernodub, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 231601 (2002);
36. M. N. Chernodub E.-M. Ilgenfritz A. Schiller Phys. Rev. D 67, 034502 (2003).
37. M. N. Chernodub, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, and A. Schiller, Phys. Lett. B 547, 269 (2002).
38. D. J. Amit, S. Elitzur, E. Rabinovici, and R. Savit, Nucl. Phys. B 210, 69 (1982).
39. O. I. Motrunich and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277004 (2002);
40. T. Senthil and O. I. Motrunich, Phys. Rev. B 66, 205104 (2002).
41. C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 178 (2000).
42. Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects, edited by S. Das Sarma and A. Pinczuk (Wiley, New York, 1997).
43. B. Douçot, M. V. Feigel’man, and L. B. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107003 (2003).
44. T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 292 (2001).
45. D. A. Bonn, J. C. Wynn, B. W. Gardner, Y.-J. Lin, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, J. R. Kirtley, and K. A. Moler, Nature (London) 414, 887 (2001).
46. I. Affleck, Z. Zou, T. Hsu, and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 38, 745 (1988).
47. C. Dasgupta and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1556 (1981).
48. P. Cea and L. Cosmai, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 064 (2001).
49. R. Savit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 453 (1980). The loop-gas representation of the 3D XY model is (Formula presented). The 3D XY model is given by the case q = 0 in Eq. (2). From Eq. (7) when (Formula presented), open-ended vortex configurations are suppressed; the system reverts to the 3D XY model, cf. (Formula presented).
50. A. Ukawa, P. Windey, and A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1013 (1980).
51. H. Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), Vol. 1.
52. Z. Tes̆anović, Phys. Rev. B 59, 6449 (1999).
53. A. K. Nguyen and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 307 (1999);
54. A. K. Nguyen A. Sudbø Europhys. Lett. 46, 780 (1999).
55. J. Hove, S. Mo, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2368 (2000).
56. R. D. Sedgewick, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. B 65, 054508 (2002).
57. See, for instance, J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
58. A. D. Bruce and N. B. Wilding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 193 (1992);
59. J. L. Alonso et al., Nucl. Phys. B 405, 574 (1993).
60. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic Press, London, 1982), Chap. 10.
61. The generalized Ising model formulation of the 8-vertex square lattice model is also given in, e.g., F. Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2314 (1971);
62. Phys. Rev. B L. P. Kadanoff and F. Wegner, 4, 3989 (1971). Another planar model exhibiting power-law singularities in the specific heat with nonuniversal exponents, is the square lattice Ashkin-Teller model, which also features a four-spin coupling.
63. J. Hove, Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2002.
64. D. R. Nelson and R. A. Pelcovits, Phys. Rev. B 16, 2191 (1977).
65. G. Bhanot and B. A. Freedman, Nucl. Phys. B 190, 357 (1981).
66. The three-dimensional noncompact U(1) gauge theory with Chern-Simons term added, is another example of a fixed-line theory with nonuniversal exponents. However, in this case both parity and time-reversal symmetry are broken. See, for instance, W. Chen, M. P. A. Fisher, and Y.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13 749 (1993);
67. Phys. Rev. B C. de Calan, A. P. C. Malbouisson, F. S. Nogueira, and N. F. Svaiter, 59, 554 (1999);
68. H. Kleinert and F. S. Nogueira, J. Phys. Stud. 5, 327 (2001).
69. F. Gliozzi, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016115 (2002).
70. J. Lee and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 137 (1990).
71. S. Mo, J. Hove, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104501 (2002).
72. H. Kleinert, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 35, 405 (1982).