A Reply to Galizio's "the Abstracted Operant: A Review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition"

Behavior Analyst

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 305-310

  Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b   Hayes, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346962650     PISSN: 07386729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392084     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders" commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
3. Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes? The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
4. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner's Verbal Behavior. A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69-84.
5. Barnes-Holmes, D., & Hayes, S. C. (2002). Relational frame theory is a behavior analytic account: Is Tonneau's? European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 3, 87-94.
6. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001a). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287-308.
7. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001b). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry: II. The Psychological Record, 51, 589-604.
8. Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Coleman, S. (1981). Historical context and systematic functions of the concept of the operant. Behaviorism, 9, 207-226.
10. Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
11. Donahoe, J. W., Crowley, M. A., Millard, W. J., & Stickney, K. A. (1982). A unified principle of reinforcement. Quantitative models of behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 493-521). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12. Galizio, M. (2003). The abstracted operant: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition, edited by S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, and B. Roche. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 159-169.
13. Hayes, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, time, and suicide. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 109-118). Reno, NV: Context Press.
14. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
15. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (in press). Behavior analysis, relational frame theory, and the challenge of human language and cognition: A reply to the commentaries on Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior.
16. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.
17. Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283-301.
18. Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
19. Lipkens, G., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
20. Lovibond, P. F., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3-26.
21. O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (in press). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record.
22. Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W. (1993). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344-1358.
23. Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
24. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25. Tonneau, F. (2001). Equivalence relations: A reply? The European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 99-128.
26. Zentall, T. R., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1993). Emergent relations in the formation of stimulus classes by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 795-810.