Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 267, Issue 1450, 2000, Pages 1341-1345

  Hayes, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contour; Gestalt good continuation; Motion induced apparent displacement; Perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA CELL; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0034617007     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1148     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Burr, D. & Ross, J. 1986 Visual processing of motion. Trends Neurosci. 9, 304-307.
2. Burr, D. C., Ross, J. & Morrone, M. C. 1986 Seeing objects in motion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 227, 249-265.
3. DeAngelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R. 1995 Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends Neurosci. 18, 431-458.
4. De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. 1991 Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Res. 31, 1619-1626.
5. Field, D. J., Hayes, A. & Hess, R. F. 1993 Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local 'association field'. Vision Res. 33, 173-193.
6. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E. & Ross, W. D. 1997 Visual brain and visual perception: how does the cortex do perceptual grouping? Trends Neurosci. 20, 106-111.
7. Hayes, A. 1997 Contour integration with stationary moving elements. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 38, 74.
8. Lotze, R. H. 1852 Medicinische Psychologie, oder Psychologie der Seele (Leipzig) bk. II, 292-294; translated by D. Cantor 'Rudolf Hermann Lotze (1817-1881) on local signs in their relation to the perception of space, 1852'. In A source book in the history of psychology (ed. R. J. Herrnstein & E. G. Boring), pp. 135-140. Harvard University Press, 1965.
9. MacKay, D. M. 1958 Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181, 507-508.
10. MacKay, D. M. 1961 Interactive processes in visual perception. In Sensory communication (ed. W. A. Rosenblith), pp. 339-355. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Mather, G., Verstraten, F. & Anstis, S. (eds) 1998 The motion after effect: a modern perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
12. Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. 1995 The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.
13. Motter, B. C. & Poggio, G. F. 1990 Dynamic stabilization of receptive fields of cortical neurons (VI) during fixation of gaze in the macaque. Exp. Brain Res. 83, 37-43.
14. Nijhawan, R. 1994 Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256-257.
15. Rock, I. 1984 Perception. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman & Co.
16. Ross, J., Morrone, M. C. & Burr, D. C. 1997 Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature 386, 598-601.
17. Spillmann, L. & Werner, J. S. 1996 Long-range interactions in visual perception. Trends Neurosci. 19, 428-434.
18. Wertheimer, M. 1938 Laws of organization in perceptual forms. London: Brace and Jovanovich.
19. Whitney, D. & Murakami, I. 1998 Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neurosci. 1, 656-657.
20. Zihl, J., Von Cramon, D. & Mai, N. 1983 Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106, 313-340.