Phantom motion aftereffects - Evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow

Current Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 717-722

  Snowden, Robert J ^a   Milne, Alan B ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRIMATES;

AFTERIMAGE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

AFTERIMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0030609093     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00329-0     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Snowden RJ: Motion processing in the primate cerebral cortex. In Visual detection of motion. Edited by Smith AT, Snowden RJ. London: Academic Press; 1994:51-83.
2. Logothetis NK: Physiological studies of motion inputs. In Visual detection of motion. Edited by Smith AT, Snowden RJ. London: Academic Press; 1994:177-216.
3. Saito H-A, Yukie M, Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Fukada Y , Iwai E: Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 1986, 6:145-157.
4. Duffy CJ, Wurtz RH: Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. J Neurophys 1991, 65:1329-1345.
5. Orban G, Lagae L, Verri A, Raigual S, Xiao D, Maes H, Torre V: First order analysis of optical flow in the monkey brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:2595-2599.
6. Graziano MSA, Andersen RA, Snowden RJ: Tuning of MST neurons to spiral stimuli. J Neurosci 1994, 14:54-67.
7. Tanaka K, Saito H: Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophys 1989, 62:626-641.
8. Barlow HB, Hill RM: Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figurai after-effects. Nature 1963, 200:1345-1347.
9. Exner S. Entwurf zu einer physiologischen Erklärung der psychischen Erscheinungen. Vienna: Deuticke; 1894.
10. Levinson E, Sekuler R: Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Res 1976, 16:779-781.
11. Mather G: The movement aftereffect and a distibution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception 1980, 9:379-382.
12. Grunwald A, Lankheet MJM: Orthogonal motion after-effect illusion predicted by a model of cortical motion processing. Nature 1996, 384:358-360.
13. Addams R: An account of a peculiar optical phaenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body etc. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 3rd series 1834, 5:373-374.
14. Masland R: Visual motion perception: experimental modification. Science 1969, 165:819-821.
15. Sekuler R, Pantle A: A model for aftereffects of seen movement. Vision Res 1967, 7:427-439.
16. Wohlgemuth A: On the aftereffect of seen motion. Brit J Psych 1911, 1:1-117.
17. Tanaka K, Fukada Y, Saito H: Underlying mechanisms of the reponse specificity of the expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophys 1989, 62:642-656.
18. Bonnet C, Pouthas V: Interactions between spatial and kinetic dimensions in the movement aftereffect. Percept Psychophys 1972, 12:193-200.
19. Weisstein N, Maguire W, Berbaum K: A phantom-motion aftereffect. Science 1977, 198:955-958.
20. MacKay DM: Visual effects of non-redundant stimulation. Nature 1961, 192:739-740.
21. Ramachandran VS, Inada V: Spatial phase and frequency in motion capture of random dot patterns. Spat Vision 1985, 1:57-67.
22. Hershenson M: Phantom spiral aftereffect: Evidence for global mechanisms in perception. Bull Psych Soc 1984, 22:535-537.
23. Green M, Chilcoat M, Stromeyer III CF: Rapid motion aftereffect seen within uniform flickering test fields. Nature 1983, 303:61-62.
24. Hiris E, Blake R: Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:9025-9028.
25. Hishida S, Ashida H, Sato T: Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli. Vision Res 1994, 34:2707-2716.
26. Ledgeway T: Adaptation to 2nd-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Vision Res 1994, 34:2879-2889.
27. Raymond JE: Complete interocular transfer of motion adaptation effects on motion coherence thresholds. Vision Res 1993, 33:1865-1870.
28. Newsome WT, Paré EB: A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 1988, 8:2201-2211.
29. Snowden RJ, Braddick OJ: The combination of motion signals over time. Vision Res 1989, 29:1621-1630.
30. Blake R, Hiris E: Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Res 1993, 33:1589-1592.
31. Edwards M, Badcock D: Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: a centripetal bias. Perception 1993, 22:1013-1023.
32. Raymond J: Movement direction analysers: independence and bandwidth. Vision Res 1993, 33:767-775.
33. Snowden RJ, Milne AB: The effects of adapting to complex motions: position invariance and tuning to spiral motions. J Cog Neurosci 1996, 8:435-452.
34. Finney, DJ: Probit analysis (3rd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.
35. Goldstein AG: On the after-effects of the waterfall and spiral illusions. Am J Psychol 1958, 71:608-609.
36. Regan D, Beverly KI: Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow. J Opt Soc Am A 1985, 2:280-283.
37. Morrone MC, Burr DC, Viana LM: Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature 1995, 376:507-509.
38. Howard RJ, Brammer M, Wright I, Woodruff PW, Bullmore ET, Zeki S: A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr Biol 1996, 8:1015-1019.