Magnetic properties of unrusted steel drums from laboratory and field-magnetic measurements

Geophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1325-1335

  Ravat, Dhananjay ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMAGNETIZATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ATTENUATION; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MAGNETIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; MAGNETIZATION; REMANENCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FIELD MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS; LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS; MAGNETIC ANOMALIES; RUSTING; STEEL DRUMS;

STEEL STRUCTURES;

BURIED TARGET; MAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MAGNETIC SURVEY; STEEL OBJECT DETECTION;

EID: 0030236033     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444056     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barrows, L., and Rocchio, J. E., 1990, Magnetic surveying for buried metallic objects: Ground Water Monitoring Review, 10, 204-211.
2. Bhattacharyya, B. K., and Chan, K. C., 1977, Reduction of magnetic and gravity data on an arbitrary surface acquired in a region of high topographic relief: Geophysics, 42, 1411-1430.
3. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. Blakely, R. J., and Connard, G. C., 1989, Crustal studies using magnetic data, in Mooney, W. D., and Pakiser, L. C., Eds., Geophysical frame-work of the continental United States: Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir, 172, 45-60.
5. Breiner, S., 1973, Applications manual for portable magnetometers: GeoMetrics.
6. Dampney, C. N. G., 1969. The equivalent source technique: Geophysics, 34, 39-53.
7. Gilkeson, R. H., Heigold, P. C., and Laymon, D. E., 1986, Practical application of theoretical models to magnetometer surveys on hazardous waste disposal sites - A case history: Ground water monitoring review, 6, 54-61.
8. Gilkeson, R. H., Gorin, S. R., and Laymon, D. E., 1992, Application of magnetic and electromagnetic methods to metal detection, in Bell, R. S. Ed., Proc. Symp. on the application of geophysics to engineerine and environmental problems, Vol. 1: Soc. Eng. and Min. Expl: Geophys., 309-328.
9. Grant, F. S., and West, G. E., 1965, Interpretation theory in applied geophysics: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
10. Hinze, W. J., 1990. The role of gravity and magnetic methods in engineering and environmental applications, in Ward, S. H., Ed., Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. 1: Soc. Expl. Geophys., 75-126.
11. Macnae, J., 1994, Viscous magnetization: Misleading Koenigsberger's Q: 64th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 456-458.
12. McKeehan, L. W., 1967, Magnets: D.Van Nostrand Co.
13. Ravat D., 1994, Use of the fractal dimension to determine the applicability of Euler's homogeneity equation for finding source locations of gravity and magnetic anomalies, in Bell, R. S., and Lepper, C. M., Eds., Proc. Symp. on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems. Vol. 1: Environ. and Eng. Geophys. Soc., 41-53.
14. Skilbrei, J. R., 1993, The straight-slope method for basement depth determination revisited: Geophysics, 58, 593-595.
15. Talwani, M., 1965, Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape: Geophysics, 30, 797-817.
16. Talwani, M., and Heirtzler, J. R., 1964, Computation of magnetic anomalies caused by two dimensional structures of arbitrary shape: Computer in the mineral industries, Part 1, Stanford University Publ., Geological Sciences, 9, 464-480.
17. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH - A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37.
18. Traynin, P., and Hansen, R. O., 1993, Magnetic modeling for highly permeable bodies with remanent magnetization: 63th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 410-413.
19. Westphalen, O., and Rice, J., 1992, Drum detection: EM versus Mag: Some revealing tests: Proc. 6th Nat. Outdoor Action Conf., 665-688.