Harvesting the genomic promise: Recombineering sequences for phenotypes

Animal Biotechnology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 103-118

  Rogatcheva, Margarita B ^a   Rund, Laurie A ^a   Beever, Jonathan E ^a   Schook, Lawrence B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; CHROMOSOMES; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

PHENOTYPES; RECOMBINEERING SEQUENCES;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); INSERTION SEQUENCES; SUIDAE;

MYOSTATIN; RECOMBINANT DNA; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; SWINE; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CLONING, MOLECULAR; DNA, RECOMBINANT; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SWINE; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

EID: 0346255324     PISSN: 10495398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/ABIO-120026481     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rohrer GA, Alexander LJ, Hu Z, Smith TPL, Keele JW, Beattie, CW. A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Res 1996; 6:371-391.
2. Paszek AA, Wilkie PJ, Flickinger GH, Rohrer GA, Alexander HLJ, Beattie CW, Schook LB. Interval mapping of growth in divergent swine cross. Mammalian Genome 1999; 10:117-122.
3. Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Kunz J, Vogel W, Hameister, H. Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting. Genomics 1995; 26:372-378.
4. Yerle M, Echard G, Robic A, Mairal A, Dubut-Fontana C, Riquet J, Pinton P, Milan D, Gillois M, Gellin J. A somatic cell hybrid panel for pig regional gene mapping characterized by molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1996; 73:194-202.
5. Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Fronicke L, Scherthan H. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Res 1998; 8:577-589.
6. Hawken RJ, Murtaugh J, Flickinger GH, Yerle M, Robic A, Milan D, Gellin J, Beattie CW, Schook LB, Alexander LJ. 1999. A first generation porcine whole-genome radiation hybrid map. Mammal Gen 1999; 10:824-830.
7. Fahrenkrug SC, Rohrer GA, Freking BA, Smith TP, Osoegawa K, Shu CL, Catanese JJ, de Jong PJ. A porcine BAC library with tenfold genome coverage: a resource for physical and genetic map integration. Mammal Genome 2001; 12:472-474.
8. Rogel-Gaillard C, Bourgeaux N, Billault A, Vaiman M, Chardon P. Construction of a swine BAC library: application to the characterization and mapping of porcine type C endoviral elements. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1999; 85:205-211.
9. Rogatcheva, MB, Rund LA, Beever JE, Counter CM, Schook LB. Recombineering pig BACs for somatic cell genomics. Intl Soc Animal Genetics A022 2002.
10. Trey R, Vesteinn T, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng JK, Bumgarner R, Goodlet DR, Aebersold R, Hood L. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 2001; 292:929-934.
11. Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Court DL Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nature Rev 2001; 2:769-779.
12. Swaminathan S, Ellis HM, Waters LS, Yu D, Lee E-C, Court DL, Sharan SK. Rapid engineering of bacterial artificial chromosomes using oligonucleotides. Genesis 2000; 29:14-21.
13. Muyrers JPP, Zhang Y, Benes V, Testa G, Ansorge W, Stewart AF. Point mutation of bacterial artificial chromosomes by ET recombination. EMBO Reports 2000; 1:239-243.
14. Zhang Y, Buchholz F, Muyrers JPP, Stewart AF. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 1998; 20:123-128.
15. Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee EC, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 97:5978-5983.
16. Lee E-C, Yu D, de Velasco M, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 2001, 73:56-65.
17. Einhauer A, Jungbauer A. The FLAG™ peptide, a versatile fusion tag for the purification of recombinant proteins. J Biochem Biophys Meth 2001; 49:455-465.
18. Capecchi MR. Generating mice with targeted mutations. Nat Med 2001; 7:1086-1090.
19. Sedivy JM, Dutriaux A. Gene targeting and somatic cell genetics: a rebirth or a coming of age? TIG 1999; 15:88-90.
20. Charron J, Malynn BA, Robertson EJ, Goff SP, Alt FW. High-frequency disruption of the N-myc gene in embryonic stem cell and pre-B cell lines by homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol 1990; 10:1799-1804.
21. Hanson KD, Sedivy JM. Analysis of biological selections for high efficiency gene targeting. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:45-51.
22. Sukuki K, Asakawa S, Lida M, Shimanuki S, Fujishima N, Hiraiwa H, Murakami Y, Shimizu N, Yasue H. Construction and evaluation of a porcine bacterial artificial chromosome library. Anim Genet 2000; 31:8-12.
23. Mateyak MK, Obaya AJ, Adachi S, Sedivy JM. Phenotypes of c-Myc-deficient rat fibroblasts isolated by targeted homologous recombination. Cell Growth Differ 1997; 8:1039-1048.
24. Albuin A, Bradley A. Recycling selectable markers in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:1851-1856.
25. Counter C, Hahn WC, Wei W, Caddle SD, Beijersbergen RL, Landsdorf PM, Sedivy JM, Weinberg RA. Dissociation among in vitro telomerase activity, telomere maintenance, and cellular immortalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95;14723-14728.