The Metric Comparability of Meta-Analytic Effect-Size Estimators from Factorial Designs

Psychological Methods

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 419-433

  Gillett, Raphael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0346199348     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.419     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bond, C. F., Jr., Wiitala, W. L., & Richard, F. D. (2003). Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Psychological Methods, 8, 406-418.
2. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
6. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Hall, J. A., Rosenthal, R., Tickle-Degnen, L., & Mosteller, F. (1994). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 17-28). New York: Sage.
8. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
9. Hedges, L. V., & Becker, B. J. (1986). Statistical methods in meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In J. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 14-50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
11. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
12. Holmes, C. T. (1984). Effect-size estimation in meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 30, 106-109.
13. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 703-726.
15. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
16. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
17. Lindgren, B. W. (1976). Statistical theory (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
18. McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424-453.
19. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (1997). Correcting effect sizes computed from factorial analysis of variance for use in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 2, 192-199.
20. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.
21. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
22. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434-447.
23. Ray, J. W., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1316-1325.
24. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Sage.
26. Seifert, T. L. (1991). Determining effect sizes in various experimental designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 341-347.
27. Shadish, W., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-281). New York: Sage.
28. Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996). Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1290-1305.
29. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.