How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size?

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1316-1325

  Ray, JoAnne W ^a,b   Shadish, William R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; SAMPLE;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; FAMILY THERAPY; HUMANS; MARITAL THERAPY; META-ANALYSIS; OBESITY; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0030458605     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1316     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
2. Benton, M. K., & Schroeder, H. E. (1990). Social skills training with schizophrenics: A meta-analytic evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 741-747.
3. Bowers, T. G., & Clum, G. A. (1988). Relative contribution of specific and nonspecific treatment effects: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled behavior therapy research. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 315-323.
4. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Cepeda-Benito, A. (1993). Meta-analytical review of the efficacy of nicotine chewing gum in smoking treatment programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 822-830.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysts for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cohen, J. (1994). The world is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 45, 997-1003
8. Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Cooper, H. M., & Lemke, K., M. (1991). On the role of meta-analysis in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 245-251.
10. Depression Guideline Panel. (1993, April). Depression in primary care: Vol. 2. Treatment of major depression (Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 5, AHCPR Pub. No. 93-0551). Rockville MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
11. Dickerson, K. (1994). Research registers. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 71-83). New York: Sage.
12. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
13. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
14. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
15. Glass, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5, pp. 351-379). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
16. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Haddock, C. K., Shadish, W. R., Klesges, R. C., & Stein, R. J. (1994). Treatments for childhood and adolescent obesity: A meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 235-244.
18. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
19. Heinsman, D. T., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate the answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods, 1, 154-169.
20. Herbert, T. B., & Cohen, S. (1993). Depression and immunity: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 472-486.
21. Holmes, C. T. (1990). Effect size estimation in meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 30, 106-109.
22. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Johnson, B. T. (1989). DSTAT. Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). Educational and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 1181-1209.
25. Lund, T. (1988). Some metrical issues with meta-analysis of therapy effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 1-8.
26. Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
27. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review, of popular, rejected, neglected. controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
28. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29-51.
29. Perry, P. (in press). Effect size calculation methods used in a meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: Approaches to problems in applications. In W. J. Bukoski (Ed.), Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs (NIDA Research Monograph). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Piorier, B. M. (1990). The effectiveness of language intervention with preschool handicapped children: An integrative review (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 137A.
31. Polich, J., Pollock, V. E., & Bloom, F. E. (1994). Meta-analysis of P300 amplitude from males at risk for alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 55-73.
32. Robinson, L. A. (1989). A guide for estimating effect sizes representing independent group differences. Unpublished manuscript. Memphis State University, Tennessee.
33. Roese, N. J., & Jamieson, D. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 363-375.
34. Seifen, T. L. (1991). Determining effect sizes in various experimental designs. Educational and psychological measurement, 51, 341-347.
35. Shadish, W. R. (1992). Do family and marital psychotherapies change what people do? A meta-analysis of behavioral outcomes. In T. D. Cook, H. M. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 129-208). New York: Sage.
36. Shadish, W. R. (1993). Manual for computing effect sizes Unpublished manuscript. University of Memphis, Tennessee.
37. Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996). Random versus nonrandom assignment in psychotherapy experiments: Do you get the same answer? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1290-1305.
38. Shoham-Salomon, V., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Paradoxical interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 22-28.
39. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-152.
41. Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational-interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
42. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1994, September). Identifying health technologies that work: Searching for evidence (OTA-H-608). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.