The French paradox: Lessons for other countries

Heart

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 107-111

  Ferrières, Jean ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLAVANOID; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; HOMOCYSTEINE; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RISK; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DIETARY INTAKE; DRINKING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ENERGY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FAT INTAKE; FRUIT; GRAIN; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LIFESTYLE; LIPID PEROXIDATION; MORTALITY; OBESITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; THROMBOCYTE AGGREGATION; VEGETABLE; WINE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0346059361     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heart.90.1.107     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Renaud S, de Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992;339:1523-6. ▶ This reference gives the definition of the French paradox and suggests the inhibition of platelet reactivity by wine may be one explanation for protection from CHD in France.
2. Artaud-Wild SM, Connor SL, Sexton G, et al. Differences in coronary mortality can be explained by differences in cholesterol and saturated fat intakes in 40 countries but not in France and Finland. A paradox. Circulation 1993;88:2771-9. ▶ France and Finland have similar intakes of cholesterol and saturated fat, but consumption of vegetables and vegetable oil containing monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids is greater in France than in Finland.
3. Richard JL, Cambien F, Ducimetière P. Epidemiologic characteristics of coronary disease in France. Nouv Presse Med 1981;10:1111-4.
4. Evans A, Ruidavets JB, McCrum E, et al. Autres pays, autres caeurs? Dietary patterns, risk factors and ischaemic heart disease in Belfast and Toulouse. QJM 1995;88:469-77. ▶ The classical CHD risk factors do not explain the large differences in CHD between Belfast (UK) and Toulouse (France), and total fat consumption do not differ between the centres.
5. Kromhout D, Keys A, Aravanis C, et al. Food consumption patterns in the 1960s in seven countries. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:889-94.
6. Chadwick DJ, Goode JA, eds. Alcohol and cardiovascular diseases: Novartis Foundation Symposium 216. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998:272.
7. Gronbaek M, Becker U, Johansen D, et al. Type of alcohol consumed and mortality from all causes, coronary heart disease, and cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:411-9. ▶ A study of the relation between different types of alcohol and mortality. Wine may have o beneficial effect on all couse mortality attributable to o reduction in death from both CHD and cancer.
8. Steinberg D. Atherogenesis in perspective: hypercholesterolemia and inflammation as partners in crime. Nat Med 2002;8:1211-7.
9. Ruidavets JB, Teissedre PL, Ferrières J, et al. Catechin in the Mediterranean diet: vegetable, fruit or wine? Atherosclerosis 2000;153:107-17.
10. Marques-Vidal P, Arveiler D, Evans A, et al. Different alcohol drinking and blood pressure relationships in France and Northern Ireland. The PRIME study. Hypertension 2001;38:1361-6. ▶ In France, alcohol consumption is rather homogeneous throughout the week. "Binge" drinking patterns observed among Northern Ireland drinkers leads to high blood pressure, consistent with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction on Mondays and Tuesdays.
11. Valmink JA, Newton JN, Hicks NR, et al. Coronary event and case fatality rates in an English population: results of the Oxford myocardial infarction incidence study. The Oxford myocardial infarction incidence study group. Heart 1998;80:40-4.
12. Menatti A, Lanti M, Puddu PE, et al. Coronary heart disease incidence in northern and southern European populations: a reanalysis of the seven countries study for a European coronary risk chart. Heart 2000;84:238-44.
13. Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JP, et al. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Systematic Revue 2001;(3):CD002137.
14. Hu FB, Willett WC. Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA 2002;288:2569-78.
15. de Lorgeril M, Renaud S, Mamelle N, et al. Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet 1994;343:1454-9. ▶ The first demonstration of the efficacy of a Mediterranean diet on various outcomes in secondary prevention.
16. Singh RB, Dubnov G, Niaz MA, et al. Effect of an Indo-Mediterranean diet on progression of coronary artery disease in high risk patients (Indo-Mediterranean diet heart study): a randomised single-blind trial. Lancet 2002;360:1455-61. ▶ A final confirmation that a Mediterranean diet rich in α linolenic acid induces a better prognosis in patients with CHD.
17. Kromhout D. On the waves of the seven countries study: a public health perspective on cholesterol. Eur Heart J 1999;20:796-802. ▶ Within Europe, similar relative risks for CHD in relation to cholesterol are observed, but with notably different absolute risks: high risks in northern Europe and low risks in the Mediterranean southern Europe.
18. Masia R, Pena A, Marrugat J, et al. High prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in Gerona, Spain, a province with low myocardial infarction incidence. REGICOR investigators. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:707-15. ▶ The prevalence of CHD risk factors in Gerona (Spain) is higher than that of Minnesota (USA), where the CHD incidence is three times higher.
19. Scarabin PY, Arveiler D, Amouyel P, et al. Plasma fibrinogen explains much of the difference in risk of coronary heart disease between France and Northern Ireland. The PRIME study. Atherosclerosis 2003;166:103-9.
20. Rozin P, Fischler C, Imada S, et al. Attitudes to food and the role of food in life in the U.S.A., Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: possible implications for the diet-health debate. Appetite 1999;33:163-80. ▶ A study of the attitudes to food in different countries. The Americans, who do the most to alter their diet, are the least likely to classify themselves as healthy eaters.