Refinements in the Care and Use of Animals in Toxicology Studies - Regulation, Validation, and Progress

Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 8-15

  Turner, Patricia V ^a,d   Smiler, Kathleen L ^a   Hargaden, Maureen ^b   Koch, Michael A ^c  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

^c 206 Carnegie Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CARE; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL MODEL; DOG; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL WELFARE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMATE; RABBIT; RAT; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TOXICITY TESTING; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEES; ANIMALS; LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; PRIMATES;

EID: 0344702855     PISSN: 10600558     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Russell, W. M. S. and R. L. Burch. 1959. The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen and Co., Ltd., London.
2. Smiler, K. L., M. A. Schroder, S. Goulet, et al. 2000. Animals in safety and toxicology studies: refinement using welfare and enrichment enhancements. Presented at the 51st National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, San Diego, Calif., November 7, 2000.
3. Smiler, K. L., M. A. Schroder, S. Goulet, et al. 2001. Animals in safety and toxicology studies: validation of new procedures in your GLP facility. Presented at the 52nd National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, Baltimore, Md., October 23, 2001.
4. Goulet, S., C. M. Petursson, P. V. Turner, et al. 2002. Safety and toxicology studies: animal welfare considerations. Presented at the 53rd National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, San Antonio, Tex., October 29, 2002.
5. Everitt, J. I., and D. M. Stark. 2001. Animal care and use in the new millennium: challenges for the toxicologist. Toxicologist 60(1):5 (abstract).
6. Dean, S. 1999. Environmental enrichment of laboratory animals used in regulatory toxicology studies. Lab. Anim. 33:309-327.
7. Purchase, I. F. H., P. A. Botham, L. H. Bruner, et al. 1998. Workshop overview: scientific and regulatory challenges for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals in toxicity testing. Toxicol. Sci. 43:86-101.
8. 50) test: the up-and-down procedure for acute oral toxicity. ILAR J. 43(4):233-243.
9. Balls, M. 1994. Replacement of animal procedures: alternatives in research, education, and testing. Lab. Anim. 28:193-211.
10. Stokes, W. S. and R. N. Hill. 2002. The role of ICCVAM in evaluating new and alternative methods. Lab. Anim. 31(7):26-32.
11. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1997. Title 21, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 9. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. FDA, Washington, D.C.
12. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1996. The Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Office for Protection from Research Risks, NIH, Rockville, Md.
13. Lipsky, M. S. and L. K. Sharp. 2001. From idea to market: the drug approval process. J. Amer. Board Fam. Pract. 14(5):362-367.
14. FDA. 1999. Title 21, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 58. Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies. FDA, Washington, D.C.
15. Howard, B. R. 2002. Control of variability. ILAR J. 43(4):194-201.
16. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1966. The Animal Welfare Act, 1966, US Code, Title 7, Sections 2131-2156. USDA, Beltsville, Md.
17. USDA, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Care. 1999. Final report on environmental enhancement to promote the psychological well-being of nonhuman primates. USDA, Riverdale, Md.
18. National Research Council. 1996. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
19. National Research Council. 1998. The psychological well-being of nonhuman primates. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
20. Griffin, G. W., S. Stokes, S. P. Pakes, et al. 2002. The ICLAS/CCAC international symposium on regulatory testing and animal welfare: introduction and overview. ILAR J. 43(Suppl):S1-S4.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2000. Guidance document on the recognition, assessment, and use of clinical signs as human endpoints for experimental animals used in safety evaluation. ENV/JM/MONO(2000)7. OECD Publication Office, Paris.
22. Capitanio, J. P. 1998. Social experience and immune system measures in laboratory-housed macaques: implications for management and research. ILAR J. 39(1):12-20.
23. Balls, M., B. Blaauboer, D. Brusick, et al. 1990. Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ALTA 18:313-337.
24. Harris, L. D., E. J. Briand, R. Orth, et al. 1999. Assessing the value of television as environmental enrichment for individually housed rhesus monkeys: a behavioral economic approach. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 38(2):48-53.
25. OECD. 1998. Validation of test methods considered for adoption as OECD test guidelines. ENV/MC/CHEM(98)6. OECD Publication Office, Paris.
26. Fillman-Holliday, D. and M. S. Landi. 2002. Animal care best practices for regulatory testing. ILAR J. 43(Suppl):S49-S58.
27. Bayne, K. A. L. 2003. Environmental enrichment of nonhuman primates, dogs and rabbits used in toxicology studies. Toxicol. Pathol. 31(Suppl):132-137.
28. Guittin, P. and T. Decelle. 2002. Future improvements and implementation of animal care practices within the animal testing regulatory environment. ILAR J. 43(Suppl):S80-S84.
29. Peace, T. A., A. W. Singer, N. A. Niemuth, et al. 2001. Retrospective analysis of foot lesion development in rats housed on wire bottom versus solid-bottom caging, and between rats from different Sprague-Dawley suppliers. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 40(5):17-21.
30. Lewi, P. J. and R. P. Marsboom. 1982. Toxicology reference data for the Wistar rat. Arch. Toxicol. Suppl 5:271-276.
31. Keenan, K. P., K. A. Soper, P. R. Hertzog, et al. 1995. Diet, overfeeding, and moderate dietary restriction in control Sprague-Dawley rats: II. effects on age-related proliferative and degenerative lesions. Toxicol. Pathol. 23(3):287-302.
32. Watson, D. S. B. 1993. Evaluation of inanimate objects on commonly monitored variables in preclinical safety studies for rats and mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 43(4):378-380.
33. Turner, P. V. and L. E. Grantham. 2002. Short-term effects of an environmental enrichment program for adult cynomolgus macaques. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41(5):13-17.
34. Mack, P. A., R. M. Bell, B. L. Tubo, et al. 2003. Validation study of social housing of canines in toxicology studies. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42(1):23-24.
35. Mack, P. A. 2002. Personal communication.
36. Francis, P. C., B. L. Hawkins, J. O. Houchins, et al. 1992. Continuous intravenous infusion in Fischer 344 rats for six months: a feasibility study. Toxicol. Meth. 2(1):1-13.
37. Jacobsen, A. 1998. Continuous infusion and chronic catheter access in laboratory animals. Lab. Anim. 27(7):37-46.
38. Nolan, T. E. and H. L. Klein. 2002. Methods in vascular infusion biotechnology in research with rodents. ILAR J. 43(3):175-182.
39. Schlatter, J. and G. Zbinden. 1982. Heart rate- and ECG-recording in the rat by biotelemetry. Arch. Toxicol. (Suppl. 5):179-183.
40. Macallum, G. E. and B. J. Houston. 1993. Characterization of cardiac alterations in nonsedated cynomolgus monkeys. Amer. J. Vet. Res. 54(2):327-332.
41. Diehl, K.-H., R. Hull, D. Morton, et al. 2001. A good-practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 21:15-23.
42. Tyssen, M. and P. V. Turner. Assessment of a point-of-care blood gas analyzer for use in laboratory animals. Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Science Symposium, Toronto, Ontario, July 7-10, 2001.
43. Rollin, R. E. 2003. Toxicology and new social ethics for animals. Toxicol. Pathol. 31(Suppl):128-131.
44. Stark, D. M. 2001. Wire-bottom versus solid-bottom rodent caging issues important to scientists and laboratory animal specialists. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 40(6):11-14.
45. Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). 1998. CCAC guidelines on choosing an appropriate endpoint in experiments using animals for research, teaching, and testing. CCAC, Ottowa, Canada.
46. Morton, D. B. 1998. Humane endpoints in animal experimentation for biomedical research: ethical, legal, and practical aspects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research. Zeist, The Netherlands, November 22-25, 1998.
47. Stokes, W. S. 2002. Humane endpoints for laboratory animals used in regulatory testing. ILAR J. 43(Suppl):S31-S38.
48. Toth, L.A. 1997. The moribund state as an experimental endpoint. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36(3):44-48.
49. Ross, J. F., J. L. Mattsson, and A. S. Fix. 1998. Expanded clinical observations in toxicity studies: historical perspectives and contemporary issues. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 28:17-26.
50. MacGregor, J. T., S. Farr, J. D. Tucker, et al. 1995. New molecular endpoints and methods for routine toxicity testing. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 26:156-173.
51. Hanash, S. 2003. Disease proteomics. Nature 422:226-232.
52. Kinter, L. B. and D. K. Johnson. 1998. Remote monitoring of experimental endpoints in animals using radiotelemetry and bioimpedance technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research. Zeist, The Netherlands, November 22-25, 1998.
53. Hampshire, V., J. Davis, and C. McNickle. 2000, Red-carpet rodent care: making the most of dollars and sense in the animal facility. Lab. Anim. 29(5):40-46.
54. Hampshire, V. 2001. Handheld digital equipment for weight composite distress paradigms: new considerations for rapid documentation and intervention of rodent populations. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 40(4):11-17.
55. Reinhardt, V. and A. Reinhardt. 2000. Blood collection procedure of laboratory primates: a neglected variable in biomedical research. J. Am. Anim. Welfare Soc. 3(4):321-333.
56. Hem, A., A. J. Smith, and P. Solberg. 1998. Saphenous vein puncture for blood sampling of the mouse, rat, hamster, gerbil, guinea pig, ferret, and mink. Lab. Anim. (UK) 32:364-368.
57. Zeller, W., H. Weber, B. Panoussis, et al. 1998. Refinement of blood sampling from the sublingual vein of rats. Lab. Anim. (UK) 32:369-376.
58. Brayton, C., M. Justice, and C. A. Montgomery. 2001. Evaluating mutant mice: anatomic pathology. Vet. Pathol. 38(1):1-19.
59. Grosenbaugh, D. A., J. E. Gadawski, and W. W. Muir. 1998. Evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in a veterinary hospital setting. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 213(5):691-694.
60. Nahas, K. and J.-P. Provost. 2002. Blood sampling in the rat: current practices and limitations. Comp. Clin. Path. 11:14-37.
61. Morton, D. B., M. Jennings, A. Buckwell, et al. 2000. Refining procedures for the administration of substances. Lab. Anim. (UK) 35:1-41.
62. Brown, A. P., N. Dinger, and B. S. Levine. 2000. Stress produced by gavage administration in the rat. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 39(1):17-21.
63. de Wit, M., A. Raabe, G. Tuinmann, et al. 2001. Implantable device for intravenous drug delivery in the rat. Lab. Anim. (UK) 35:321-324.
64. Turner, T. N., P. A. Werner, B. J. Ebert, et al. 2002. A cost-effective method of daily one-hour infusion in rats. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41(4):96 (abstract).
65. Boerman, O. C., E. Th. M. Dams, W. J. G. Oyen, et al. 2001. Radiopharmaceuticals for scintigraphic imaging of infection and inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 50:55-64.
66. Goode, T. L. and H. L. Klein. 2002. Miniaturization: an overview of biotechnologies for monitoring the physiology and pathophysiology of rodent animal models. ILAR J. 43(3):136-146.
67. Forsten, M. J., P. Morris, and R. S. Sohal. 2003. Genotype and age influence the effect of caloric intake on mortality in mice. FASEB J. 17:690-692.
68. Wade, C. M., E. J. Kulbokas, A. W. Kirby, et al. 2002. The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 420:574-578.
69. Bayne, K. 2002. Development of the human-research animal bond and its impact on animal well-being. ILAR J. 43(1):4-9.
70. Smiler, K. L. 2000. Pharmaceutical veterinarians survey. 51st National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, San Diego, Calif., November 7, 2000.
71. Smiler, K. L. 2001. Pharmaceutical veterinarians survey. 52nd National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, Baltimore, Md., October 23, 2001.
72. Koch, M. A. 2001. Pair housing of cynomolgus and rhesus macaques for regulatory toxicology studies: validation and impact on studies. 52nd National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, Baltimore, Md., October 23, 2001.
73. Hargaden, M. 2001. Validation of the use of solid-bottom cages for co-housed rats. 52nd National Meeting of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, Baltimore, Md., October 23, 2001.