Toxicology and new social ethics for animals

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL., 2003, Pages 128-131

  Rollin, Bernard E ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal rights; Animal welfare; New social ethic for animals; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMAL WELFARE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ETHICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; TOXICOLOGY; ANIMAL ABUSE; ARTICLE; LAW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037260329     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01926230309764     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. For a detailed account of the social conditions giving rise to the demand for a new ethic for animals, see B. Rollin: Farm Animal Welfare (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1995) Part I. For a philosophically based rational reconstruction of the new ethic see Rollin B (1992). Animal Rights and Human Morality, 2nd ed, Prometheus Buffalo, NY. For a utilitarian account of the new ethic see Peter Singer: Animal Liberation (New York: New York Review of Books Press, 1975). For a rights based account see Tom Regan: The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
2. For a detailed account of the social conditions giving rise to the demand for a new ethic for animals, see B. Rollin: Farm Animal Welfare (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1995) Part I. For a philosophically based rational reconstruction of the new ethic see Rollin B (1992). Animal Rights and Human Morality, 2nd ed, Prometheus Buffalo, NY. For a utilitarian account of the new ethic see Peter Singer: Animal Liberation (New York: New York Review of Books Press, 1975). For a rights based account see Tom Regan: The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
3. For a detailed account of the social conditions giving rise to the demand for a new ethic for animals, see B. Rollin: Farm Animal Welfare (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1995) Part I. For a philosophically based rational reconstruction of the new ethic see Rollin B (1992). Animal Rights and Human Morality, 2nd ed, Prometheus Buffalo, NY. For a utilitarian account of the new ethic see Peter Singer: Animal Liberation (New York: New York Review of Books Press, 1975). For a rights based account see Tom Regan: The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
4. For a detailed account of the social conditions giving rise to the demand for a new ethic for animals, see B. Rollin: Farm Animal Welfare (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1995) Part I. For a philosophically based rational reconstruction of the new ethic see Rollin B (1992). Animal Rights and Human Morality, 2nd ed, Prometheus Buffalo, NY. For a utilitarian account of the new ethic see Peter Singer: Animal Liberation (New York: New York Review of Books Press, 1975). For a rights based account see Tom Regan: The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
5. de Greeve P, de Leeuw W (1997). Developments in Alternatives and Animal Use in Europe. In: Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics, vanZutphen LFM, Balls M (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
6. Shalev M (1998). European and U.S. regulation of monoclonal antibodies. Lab Animal, January, 1998. 15 ff.
7. O'donoghue P (1992). European regulation of animal experiments. Lab Animal, September 1991. 20 ff.
8. See Rollin BE (1989). The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consiousness, Animal Pain and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Gaskell G et al (1997). Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 387: 845 ff.
10. Rollin BE (1998). Social ethics, animal suffering, and the creation of transgenic animal models of human genetic disease. In: Bioethics and the Use of Laboratory Animals, Kraus AL, Renquist D (eds). American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine, Benoit, Dubuque, Iowa, pp 109-123.