Maternal antibodies block induction of oral tolerance in newly hatched chicks

Vaccine

Volumn 22, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 493-502

  Klipper, Eyal ^a   Sklan, David ^a   Friedman, Aharon ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Chick; Maternal antibodies; Oral tolerance

Indexed keywords

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; MATERNAL ANTIBODY;

ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; CIRCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEEDING; HATCHING; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; LYMPHOID TISSUE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0344665672     PISSN: 0264410X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Klipper E., Sklan D., Friedman A. Immune response of chickens to dietary protein antigens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 74:2000;209-223.
2. Klipper E., Sklan D., Friedman A. Response, tolerance and ignorance following oral exposure to a single protein antigen in Gallus domesticus. Vaccine. 19:2001;2890-2897.
3. Bar-Shira E., Sklan D., Friedman A. Establishment of immune competence in the avian GALT during the immediate post-hatch period. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 27:2003;147-157.
4. Lin M.Y., Kleven S.H. Transferred humoral immunity in chickens to Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian. Dis. 28:1984;79-87.
5. Malkinson M. The transmission of passive immunity to Escherichia coli from mother to young in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Immunology. 9:1965;311-317.
6. Spencer J.L., Robertson A. Influence of maternal antibody on infection with virulent or attenuated Marek's disease herpesvirus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 33:1972;393-400.
7. Darbyshire J.H., Peters R.W. Humoral antibody response and assessment of protection following primary vaccination of chicks with maternally derived antibody against avian infectious bronchitis virus. Res. Vet. Sci. 38:1985;14-21.
8. Tsukamoto K., Tanimura N., Kakita S.et al. Efficacy of three live vaccines against highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus in chickens with or without maternal antibodies. Avian Dis. 39:1995;218-229.
9. Mondal S.P., Naqi S.A. Maternal antibody to infectious bronchitis virus: its role in protection against infection and development of active immunity to vaccine. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 79:2001;31-40.
10. Sakaguchi M., Nakamura H., Sonoda K.et al. Protection of chickens with or without maternal antibodies against both Marek's and Newcastle diseases by one-time vaccination with recombinant vaccine of Marek's disease virus type 1. Vaccine. 16:1998;472-479.
11. Naqi S.A., Marquez B., Sahin N. Maternal antibody and its effect on infectious bursal disease immunization. Avian Dis. 27:1983;623-631.
12. Leitner G., Heller E.D., Friedman A. Sex related differences in immune response and survival rate of broiler chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 21:1989;249-260.
13. Zigterman G.J.W.J., Ven W.V.D., Geffen C.V.et al. Detection of mucosal immune responses in chickens after immunization or infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunophathol. 36:1993;281-291.
14. Weiner H.L., Friedman A., Miller A.et al. Oral tolerance: immunologic mechanisms and treatment of animal and human organ-specific autoimmune diseases by oral administration of autoantigens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:1994;809-837.
15. Strobel S., Mowat A.M. Immune responses to dietary antigens: oral tolerance. Immunol. Today. 19:1998;173-181.
16. Rothberg R.M., Kraft S.C., Farr R.S. Similarities between rabbit antibodies produced following ingestion of bovine serum albumin and following parenteral immunization. J. Immunol. 98:1967;386-399.
17. Dolezel J., Bienenstock J. Immune response of the hasmster to oral and parenteral immunization. Cell. Immunol. 2:1971;326-334.
18. Friedman A., Al-Sabbagh A., Santos L.M., Fishman-Lobell J., Polanski M., Das M.P. Oral tolerance: a biological relevant pathway to generate peripheral tolerance against external and self antigens. Chem. Immunol. 58:1994;259-290.
19. Melamed D., Friedman A. Modification of the immune response by oral tolerance: antigen requirements and interaction with immunogenic stimuli. Cell. Immunol. 146:1993;412-420.
20. Hachimura S., Takahashi Y., Fujikawa Y. Suppression of the systemic immune response to casein by oral administration of a tryptic digest of casein. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57:1993;1674-1677.
21. Mowat A.M. Basic mechanisms and clinical implications of oral tolerance. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 15:1999;546-556.
22. Strobel S. Immunity induced after a feed of antigen during early life: oral tolerance v. sensitisation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 60:2001;437-442.
23. h2 lymphocytes induced by continuous feeding of ovalbumin. Internat. Immunol. 8:1996;717-724.
24. Strobel S. Oral tolerance, systemic immunoregulation, and autoimmunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 958:2002;47-58.
25. Brandtzaeg P.E. Current understanding of gastrointestinal immunoregulation and its relation to food allergy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 964:2002;13-45.
26. Zhang X., Izikson L., Liu L., Weiner H.L. Activation of CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells by oral antigen administration. J. Immunol. 167:2001;4245-4253.
27. Miller A., Lider O., Abramsky O., Weiner H.L. Orally administered myelin basic protein in neonates primes for immune responses and enhances experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in adult animals. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1994;1026-1032.
28. Stern M., Pang K.Y., Walker W.A. Food proteins and gut mucosal barrier. II. Differential interaction of cow's milk proteins with the mucous coat and the surface membrane of adult and immature rat jejunum. Pediatr. Res. Dec. 18:1984;1252-1257.
29. Udall J.N., Pang K., Fritze L., Kleinman R., Walker W.A. Development of gastrointestinal mucosal barrier. I. The effect of age on intestinal permeability to macromolecules. Pediatr. Res. 15:1981;241-244.
30. Ueda Y., Hachimura S., Somaya T., Hisatsune T., Kaminogawa S. Apoptosis of antigen-specific T cells induced by oral administration of antigen: comparison of intestinal and non-intestinal immune organs. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:2001;1170-1174.
31. Geyra A., Uni Z., Sklan D. Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the posthatch chick. Poult. Sci. 80:2001;776-782.
32. Uni Z., Noy Y., Sklan D. Posthatch development of small intestinal function in the poult. Poult. Sci. 78:1999;215-222.
33. Uni Z., Geyra A., Ben-Hur H., Sklan D. Small intestinal development in the young chick: crypt formation and enterocyte proliferation and migration. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:2000;544-551.
34. Strobel S. Mechanisms of gastrointestinal immunoregulation and food induced injury to the gut. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 45:1991;1-9.
35. Udall J.N., Colony P., Fritze L., Pang K., Walker W.A. Development of gastrointestinal mucosal barrier. II. The effect of natural versus artificial feeding on intestinal permeability to macromolecules. Pediatr. Res. 15:1981;245-249.
36. Tempelis C.H., Wolfe H.R., Mueller A. The production of immunological unresponsiveness by the intravenous injection of BSA into the chick embryo. Brit. J. Exp. Path. 39:1958;323-327.
37. Hirata A., Schechtman A.M. Studies on immunologic depression in chickens. J. Immunol. 85:1960;230-239.