Structure trees and species trees: What they say about morphological development and evolution

Evolution and Development

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 609-621

  Geeta, R ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; TREE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOWER; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; REVIEW;

FLOWERS; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTS;

LILIOPSIDA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0344272467     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03066.x     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Abouheif, E. 1997. Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 405-408.
2. Arber, A. 1950. The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Arthur, W. 2002. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 415: 757-764.
4. Bandelt, H. J., and Dress, W. M. 1992. Splits decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 1: 242-252.
5. Bharathan, G. 1996. Does the monocot mode of leaf development characterize all monocots? Aliso 14: 271-279.
6. Bharathan, G., Goliber, T., Moore, C., Kessler, S., Pham, T., and Sinha, N. R. 2002. Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOX1 gene expression during development. Science 296: 1858-1860.
7. Chen, J. -J., Janssen, B. -J., Williams, A., and Sinha, N. 1997. A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: alterations in leaf shape and implications for morphological evolution. Plant Cell 9: 1289-1304.
8. de Beer, G. 1958. Embryos and Ancestors. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Dengler, N. G. 2001. Regulation of vascular development. J. Plant Growth Reg. 20: 1-13.
10. Dengler, N. G., and Kang, J. 2001. Vascular patterning and leaf shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 50-56.
11. Donoghue, M. J. 1992. Homology. In E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd (eds.). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 170-179.
12. Doyle, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17: 144-163.
13. Doyle, J. J. 1996. Homoplasy connections and disconnections: genes and species, molecules and morphology. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.). Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 37-66.
14. Drinnan, A. N., Crane, P. R., and Hoot, S. B. 1994. Patterns of floral evolution in the early diversification of non-magnoliid dicotyledons (eudicots). Plant Syst. Evol. 8: 93-122.
15. Fitch, W. M. 1970. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19: 99-113.
16. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
17. Floyd, S. K., and Friedman, W. E. 2000. Evolution of endosperm developmental patterns among basal flowering plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: S57-S81.
18. Freeling, M. 1992. A conceptual framework for maize leaf development. Dev. Biol. 153: 44-58.
19. Futuyma, D. 1998. Evolutionary Biology. 3rd Ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
20. Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. The Bellnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Gregory, W. K. 1934. Polyisomerism and anisomerism in cranial and dental evolution among vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 20: 1-9.
22. Gregory, W. K. 1935. Reduplication in evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 10: 272-290.
23. Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Parnis, A., Eshed, Y., and Lifcshitz, E. 1996. The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 84: 735-744.
24. Hufford, L. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of Hydrangeaceae based on morphological data. Intl. J. Pl. Sci. 158: 652-672.
25. Hufford, L. 2001. Ontogeny and morphology of the fertile flowers of Hydrangea and allied genera of tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 137: 139-187.
26. Huson, D. H. 2002. SplitsTree 2.4. Computer program. ftp://ftp. unibielefeld.de/pub/math/splits/splitstree2.
27. Kaplan, D. R. (1973). The monocotyledons: their evolution and comparative biology. VII. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons. Q. Rev. Biol. 48: 437-457.
28. Kenrick, P., and Crane, P. R. 1997. The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
29. Knoll, F. 1948. Bau, Entwicklung und morphologische Bedeutung unifazialer Vorlauferspitzen an Monokotylenblattern. Ost. Bot. Z. 95: 163-193.
30. Kramer, E. M., and Irish, V. F. 2000. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. Intl. J. Pl. Sci. 161: S29-S40.
31. Lipscomb, D. L. 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. Cladistics 8: 45-65.
32. Magwene, P. 2001. Comparing ontogenetic trajectories using growth process data. Syst. Biol. 50: 640-656.
33. Mindell, D. P., and Meyer, A. 2001. Homology evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 434-440.
34. Mooney, M., and Freeling, M. 1997. Using regulatory genes to investigate the evolution of leaf form. Maydica 42: 173-184.
35. O'Keefe, F. R., and Wagner, P. J. 2001. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility. Syst. Biol. 50: 657-675.
36. Olson, E. V., and Miller, R. L. 1958. Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Oster, G., and Alberch, P. 1982. Evolution and bifurcation of developmental systems. Evolution 36: 444-459.
38. Oster, G., Murray, J. D., and Harris, A. K. 1983. Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 78: 83-125.
39. Panchen, A. L. 1992. Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds.). Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London.
41. Patterson, C. 1988. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 603-625.
42. Rice, S. H. 1998. The bio-geometry of mollusc shells. Paleobiology 24: 133-149.
43. Riedl, R. 1979. Order in Living Organisms. John Wiley & Sons, Chicester, England.
44. Rohlf, F. J. 1982. Consensus indices for comparing classifications. Math. Biosci. 59: 131-144.
45. Roth, V. L. 1994. Within and between organisms: replicators, lineages and homologues. In B. K. Hall (ed.). Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 302-337.
46. Roth, V. L., and Mercer, J. M. 2000. Morphometrics in development and evolution. Am. Zool. 40: 801-810.
47. Rudall, P. J., and Buzgo, B. 2002. Evolutionary history of the monocot leaf. In Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman, and J. A. Hawkins (eds.). Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. Systematics Association, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 431-458.
48. Sanderson, M. J., and Hufford, L. (eds.). 1996. Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.
49. Sattler, R. 1966. Towards a more adequate approach to comparative morphology. Phytomorphology 16: 417-429.
50. Sattler, R. 1984. Homology - a continuing challenge. Syst. Bot. 9: 382-394.
51. Schneider, H., Pryer, K. M., Cranfill, R., Smith, A. R., and Wolf, P. G. 2002. Evolution of vascular body plans: a phylogenetic perspective. In Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman, and J. A. Hawkins (eds.). Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 330-364.
52. Schlosser, G. 2002. Modularity and the units of evolution. Theor. Biosci. 121: 1-80.
53. Soltis, D. E., Xiang, Q. -Y., and Hufford, L. 1995. Relationships and evolution of Hydrangeaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 82: 504-514.
54. Soltis, D. E., et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
55. Swofford, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from morphological and molecular data incongruent? In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft (eds.). Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, New York.
56. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP4.0b: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
57. Timmermans, M. C. P., Schultes, N. P., Jankovsky, J. P., and Nelson, T. 1998. Leafbladeless1 is required for dorsoventrality of lateral organs in maize. Developmental 125: 2813-2823.
58. Trueman, J. W. H. 1998. Reverse successive weighting. Syst. Biol. 47: 733-737.
59. Waddington, C. H. 1960. Evolutionary adaptation. In S. Tax (ed.). Evolution after Darwin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 381-402.
60. Wagner, G. P. 1989. The biological homology concept. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 51-69.
61. Weston, P. H. 2000. Process morphology from a cladistic perspective. In R. Scotland and R. T. Pennington (eds.). Homology and Systematics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 124-144.
62. Wilkins, A. S. 2001. The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
63. Williams, G. C. 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.