Comparing ontogenetic trajectories using growth process data

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 640-656

  Magwene, Paul M ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth; Morphometrics; Ontogeny; Shape; Size; Testudines

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; BODY CONSTITUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TURTLE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; BODY CONSTITUTION; GROWTH; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; TURTLES;

EID: 0035527362     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351501753328785     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ACKERLY, S. C. 1989. Kinematics of accretionary shell growth, with examples from braciopods and molluscs. Paleobiology 15:147-164.
2. ALBERCH, P., S. J. GOULD, G. F. OSTER, AND D. B. WAKE. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phytogeny. Paleobiology 5:296-317.
3. ANDERSEN, H. H., M. HØJBJERRE, D. SØRENSEN, AND P. S. ERIKSEN. 1995. Linear and graphical models for the multivariate complex normal distribution. Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. ATCHLEY, W. R. 1987. Developmental quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogenies. Evolution 41:316-330.
5. ATCHLEY, W. R., AND B. K. HALL. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol. Rev. 66:101-157.
6. AVERY, G. S., JR. 1933. Structure and development of the tobacco leaf. Am. J. Bot. 20:565-593.
7. BARNETT, S. 1990. Matrices: Methods and applications. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
8. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Int. 11:567-585.
9. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
10. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. Pages 131-151 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.
11. BORISENKO, A. I., AND I. E. TARAPOV. 1979. Vector and tensor analysis with applications. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
12. CAGLE, F. R. 1946. The growth of the slider turtle, Pseudemys scripta elegans. Am. Midl. Nat. 36:685-729.
13. COX, R. W., AND M. A. PEACOCK. 1978. The velocity field of growing ear cartilage. J. Anat. 126:555-566.
14. COX, R. W., AND M. A. PEACOCK. 1979. The growth of elastic cartilage. J. Anat. 128:207-213.
15. DRYDEN, I. L., AND K. V. MARDIA. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
16. ERICKSON, R. O. 1966. Relative elemental rates and anisotropy of growth in area: A computer programme. J. Exp. Bot. 17:390-403.
17. ERICKSON, R. O. 1979. Modeling of plant growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27:407-434.
18. ERNST, C. H., J. E. LOVICH, AND R. W. BARBOUR. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
19. FRAZIER, J. 1985. A review of in vivo labels for studies of age determination and growth in amphibians and reptiles. Herpetologica 41:222-227.
20. GAFFNEY, E. S., AND P. A. MEYLAN. 1988. A phylogeny of turtles. Pages 157-219 in the phylogeny and classification of the Tetrapods, volume 1: Amphibians, reptiles, birds (M.J. Benton, ed.) Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
21. GERMANO, D. J. 1998. Scutes and age determination of desert tortoises revisted. Copeia 1998:482-484.
22. GOULD, S. J. 1997. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
23. HAIDUK, M. W., AND J. W. BICKHAM. 1982. Chromosomal homologies and evolution of testudinoid turtles with emphasis on the systematic placement of Platysternon. Copeia 1982:60-66.
24. KENT, J. T. 1994. The complex Bingham distribution and shape analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 56:285-299.
25. KLEVEZAL, G. A. 1996. Recording structures of mammals. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
26. KRZANOWSKI, W. J. 1988. Principles of multivariate analysis: A user's perspective. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
27. LAMB, T. L. C. 1994. A molecular phylogeny of the gopher tortoises, with comments on familial relationships within the Testudinoidea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:283-291.
28. LESTREL, P. E. (ed.). 1997. Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
29. LITZGUS, J. D., AND R. D. BROOKS. 1998. Testing the validity of counts of plastral scute rings in spotted turtles, Clemmys guttata. Copeia 1998:222-225.
30. LOEHLIN, J. 1992. Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, New Jersey.
31. MÄRKEL, K. 1981. Experimental morphology of coronar growth in regular echinoids. Zoomorphology 97:31-52.
32. MAGWENE, P. M. 2001. New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution, in press.
33. MCKINNEY, M. L., AND K. J. MCNAMARA. 1991. Heterochrony: The evolution of ontogeny. Plenum Press, New York.
34. NEEDHAM, A. E. 1950. The form-transformation of the abdomen of the female pea-crab, Pinnotheres pisum Leach. Proc. R. Soc. London B 137:115-136.
35. OKAMOTO, T. 1988. Analysis of heteromorph ammonoids of differential geometry. Paleontology 31:35-52.
36. PEDOE, D. 1988. Geometry. A comprehensive course. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
37. RAFF, R. A. 1996. The shape of life. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. RAUP, D. M. 1960. Ontogenetic variation in the crystallography of echinoid calcite. J. Paleontol. 34:1041-1050.
39. RAUP, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. J. Paleontol. 40:1178-1190.
40. REILLY, S. M., E. O. WILEY, AND D. J. MEINHARDT. 1997. An integrative approach to heterochrony: The distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:119-143.
41. RICE, S. H. 1997. The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:907-912.
42. RICE, S. H. 1998. The bio-geometry of mollusc shells. Paleobiology 24:133-149.
43. RICHARDS, O. W., AND A. J. KAVANAGH. 1943. The analysis of the relative growth-gradients and changing form of growing organisms: Illustrated by the tobacco leaf. Am. Nat. 77:385-399.
44. RICHARDS, O. W., AND A. J. KAVANAGH. 1945. The analysis of growing form. Pages 188-230 in Essays on growth and form (W. E. Le Gros Clark and P. B. Medawar, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
45. SCHOENWOLF, G. C., AND P. SHEARD. 1989. Shaping and bending of the avian neural plates as analysed with a fluorescent-histochemical marker. Development 105:17-25.
46. SHAFFER, H. B., P. MEYLAN, AND M. L. MCKNIGHT. 1997. Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Syst. Biol. 46:235-268.
47. SIEGERT, F., C. J. WEIJER, A. NOMURA, AND H. MIIKE. 1994. A gradient method for the quantitative analysis of cell movement and tissue flow and its application to the analysis of multicellular dictyostelium development. J. Cell Sci. 107:97-104.
48. SILK, W. K. 1984. Quantitative descriptions of development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:479-518.
49. SILK, W. K., AND R. O. ERICKSON. 1978. Kinematics of hypocotyl curvature. Am. J. Bot. 65:310-319.
50. SKALAK, R. 1981. Growth as a finite displacement field. Pages 347-355 in Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Finite Elasticity (D. E. Carlson and R. T. Shield, eds.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hauge.
51. SKALAK, R., G. DASGUPTA, M. MOSS, E. OTTEN, P. DULLEMEIJER, AND H. VILMANN. 1982. Analytical description of growth. J. Theor. Biol. 94:555-577.
52. SKALAK, R., D. A. FARROW, AND A. HOGER. 1997. Kinematics of surface growth. J. Math. Biol. 35:869-907.
53. STEWART, I., AND D. TALL. 1983. Complex analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
54. STONE, J. R. 1995. CerioShell: a computer program designed to simulate variation in shell form. Paleobiology 21:509-519.
55. THOMPSON, D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
56. WAGNER, G. P., AND L. ALTENBERG. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
57. WALKER, J. A. 1993. Ontogenetic allometry of three-spine stickleback body form using landmark-based morphometrics. Pages 193-214 in Contributions to morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. Garcia-Valdecasas, eds.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.
58. WHITAKER, J. 1990. Graphical models in applied mathematical multivariate statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
59. WOODGER, J. H. 1945. On biological transformations. Pages 95-120 in Essays on growth and form (W. E. Le Gros Clark and P. B. Medawar, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
60. ZANGERL, R. 1969. The turtle shell. Pages 311-339 in Biology of the Reptilia (C. Gans, A. D. A. Bellairs, and T. S. Parsons, eds.). Academic Press, New York.
61. ZELDITCH, M. L., F. L. BOOKSTEIN, AND B. L. LUNDRIGAN. 1992. Ontogeny of integrated skull growth in the cotton rat Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 46:1164-1180.
62. ZELDITCH, M. L., AND W. L. FINK. 1995. Allometry and developmental integration of body growth in a piranha, Pygocentrus nattereri (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). J. Morphol. 223:341-355.
63. ZELDITCH, M. L., D. SHEETS, AND W. L. FINK. 2000. Spatiotemporal reorganization of growth rates in the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 54:1363-1371.