ICTs and Political Life

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2004, Pages 410-482

  Robbin, Alice ^a   Courtright, Christina ^a   Davis, Leah ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344066264     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440380110     Document Type: Review

References (276)

1. Abbott, J. P. (2001). Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 99-114.
2. Abramson, M. A., & Means, G. E. (Eds.). (2001). E-government 2001. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
3. Accenture. (2001, March 30). eGovernment leadership: Rhetoric vs reality: Closing the gap. Retrieved October 11, 2002, from http://www.accenture.com/xdoc/en/industries/government/final.pdf
4. Agre, P. E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18(5), 311-331.
5. Aines, A. A., & Day, M. S. (1976). National planning of information services. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 10, 3-42.
6. Alford, R. R. (1998). The craft of inquiry: Theories, methods, evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Allen, B. A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people & prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 93-104.
8. Allen, R., & Miller, N. (2000). Panaceas and promises of democratic participation: Reactions to new channels, from the wireless to the World Wide Web. In S. Wyatt, F. Henwood, N. Miller, & P. Senker (Eds.), Technology and in/equality: Questioning the information society (pp. 46-60). London: Routledge.
9. Armond P. de. (2001). Netwar in the Emerald City: WTO protest strategy and tactics. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 201-235). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
10. Armstrong, K. A. (2001). The rediscovery of civil society in the production of governance. Retrieved September 18, 2002, from http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/eucenter/Conferences/Restricted/ Civil%20Society%20-%20Wisonsin.pdf
11. Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.). (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
12. Atkinson, R. (2000). Creating a digital federal government. Information Impacts Magazine, 3(10). Retrieved October 20, 2002, from http://www.cisp.org/imp/october_2000/10_00atkinson.htm
13. Baber, Z. (2002). Engendering or endangering democracy? The Internet, civil society and the public sphere. Asian Journal of Social Science, 30(2), 287-303.
14. Backus, M. (2001, April). E-governance and developing countries: Introduction and examples. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.ftpiicd.org/files/research/reports/report3.pdf
15. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16. Barber, B. (1995). Searching for civil society. National Civic Review, 84(2), 114-118.
17. Barber, B. (2001). The uncertainty of digital politics: Democracy's uneasy relationship with information technology. Harvard International Review, 23(1), 42-47.
18. Barber, B., Mattson, K., & Person, J. (1997). Electronically-enhanced democracy: A report of the Walt Whitman Center. Retrieved November 12, 2002, from http://wwc.rutgers.edu/markle.htm
19. Becker, E. (2002, February 24). Web site helped change farm policy. New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2002, from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/24/politics/24WORK.htm
20. Becker, T. (2001), Rating the impact of new technologies on democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 39-43.
21. Beddie, L., Macintosh, L., & Malina, A. (2001). E-democracy and the Scottish Parliament. In B. Schmid, K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, & V. Tschammer (Eds.), Towards the e-society: E-commerce, e-business, and e-government (pp. 695-705). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
22. Bellamy, C. (2002). From automation to knowledge management: Modernising British government with ICTs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 213-230.
23. Bellamy, C., & Taylor, J. A. (1998). Governing in the information age, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
24. Bennett, W. L. (2000). Introduction: Communication and civic engagement in comparative perspective. Political Communication, 17(4,), 307-312.
25. Berman, J., & Witzner, D. J. (1997). Technology and democracy. Social Research, 64(3), 1313-1320.
26. Berninger, D. E., & Adkinson, B. W. (1978). Interaction between the public and private sectors in national information programs. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 13, 3-36.
27. Berry, J. M. (1997). The interest group society (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
28. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160.
29. Bimber, B. (1999). The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication, 16(4), 409-428.
30. Bimber, B. (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, 17(4,), 329-333.
31. Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 53-68.
32. Birdsell, D. S., & Muzzio, D. A. (1999). Government programs involving citizen access to Internet services. Retrieved October 20, 2002, from http://www.markle.org/news/gov_citizenaccess.pdf
33. Blau, A. (1999). Floods don't build bridges: Rich networks, poor citizens, and the role of public libraries. In S. Criddle, L. Dempsey, & R. Heseltine (Eds.), Information landscapes for a learning society: Networking and the future of libraries 3 (pp. 123-132). London: Library Association.
34. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Brady, H., E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271-294.
36. Browning, G. (2002). Electronic democracy: Using the Internet to transform American politics (2nd ed.). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
37. Bryan, C. (1998). Manchester: Democratic implications of an economic initiative? In R. Tsagarousianou, D. Tambini, & C. Bryan (Eds.), Cyber democracy: Technology, cities and civic networks (pp. 152-166). London: Routledge.
38. Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
39. Burke, S. (1999). Some cautionary notes on the "virtual state. " In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 163-168). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
40. Butcher, J., Sulek, D., MacDougall, E., Hines, K., Kertesz, A., & Svec, D. (2002). Digital democracy: Voting in the information age. Retrieved March 3, 2003, from http://www.pirp.harvard.edu
41. Cardiff County Council. (2002). Local democracy. Retrieved December 7, 2002, from http://www.cardiff.gov.uk/corporate/Democracy/main.htm#function
42. Cardoso, F. H. (2001). Democracy as a starting point. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 5-14.
43. Carlson, T., & Djupsund, G. (2001). Old wine in new bottles? The 1999 Finnish election campaign on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 68-87.
44. Carpini, M. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
45. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1996). Developing the Blacksburg Village. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 69-74.
46. Carveth, R., & Metz, J. (1996). Frederick Jackson Turner and the democratization of the electronic frontier. American Sociologist, 27(1), 72-100.
47. Center for Digital Discourse and Culture, (n.d.). Digital governance. Retrieved December 4, 2002, from www.cddc.vt.edu/digitalgov/gov-menu.htm
48. Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2001, September). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: "E-government" in the United States, Britain and the European Union. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco. Retrieved September 19, 2002, from http://pro.harvard.edu/abstracts/040/040004ChadwickAn.htm
49. Christiano, T. (1997). The significance of public deliberation. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 243-278). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Civille, R. (1996). The Internet and the poor. In B. Kahin & J. Keller (Eds.), Public access to the Internet (pp. 175-207). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. F. (2003). Britain (not) at the polls, 2001. Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 59-64.
52. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80-93.
53. Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (1997). Directly deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3, 313-342.
54. Cole, J. I. (2000). Surveying the digital future. Retrieved December 3, 2001, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu
55. Cole, J. I. (2001). Surveying the digital future: Year two. Retrieved December 3, 2001, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu
56. Cole, J. I. (2003). Surveying the digital future: Year three. Retrieved February 1, 2003, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu
57. Coleman, S. (1999a). Can the new media invigorate democracy? Political Quarterly, 70(1), 16-22.
58. Coleman, S. (1999b). Cutting out the middle man: From virtual representation to direct deliberation. In B. N. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 195-210). London: Routledge.
59. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (n.d.). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. Retrieved October 11, 2002, from http://bowlingtogether.net/about.html
60. Dahl, R. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61. Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615-633.
62. Danziger, J. N., Dutton, W. H., Kling, R., & Kraemer, K. L. (1982). Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York: Columbia University Press.
63. Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 171-228.
64. Davies, J. S. (2002). The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the "governing without government." Public Administration, 80(2), 301-322.
65. Davies, P. H. J. (2002). Intelligence, information technology, and information warfare. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 313-352.
66. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Dawes, S. S., & Prefontaine, L. (2003). Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 40-42.
68. Deakins, E., & Dillon, S. M. (2002). E-government in New Zealand: The local authority perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 375-398.
69. Deanitz, T., & Strobel, W. P. (2001). Networking dissent: Cyber activists use the Internet to promote democracy in Burma. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 129-169). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
70. DeConti, L. (1998). Planning and creating a government Web site: Experience of US States. Manchester, UK: Institute for Development and Policy Management, University of Manchester.
71. Denning, D. E. (2001). Activism, hacktivism, and cyberterrorism: The Internet as a tool for influencing foreign policy. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 239-287). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
72. Depla, P. F. G., & Tops, P. W. (1995). Political parties in the digital era. The technological challenge? In W. B. H. J. van de Donk, I. T. M. Snellen, & P. W. Tops (Eds.), Orwell in Athens (pp. 155-178). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
73. Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking civil society: Towards consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 5-17.
74. Docter, S., & Button, W. H. (1998). The first amendment on-line: Santa Monica's Public Electronic Network. In R. Tsagarousianou, D. Tambini, & C. Bryan (Eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks (pp. 125-151). London: Routledge.
75. Doctor, R. D. (1992). Social equity and information technologies: Moving toward information democracy. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 27, 43-96.
76. Encarnación, O. G. (2002). On bowling leagues and NGOs: A critique of civil society revival [Book review]. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(4), 116-131.
77. Flinders, M. (2002). Governance in Whitehall. Public Administration, 80(1), 51-75.
78. Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38-52.
79. Folk, N., & Goldschmidt, K. (2003). Congress online 2003: Turning the corner on the information age. Washington, DC: Congress Online Project. Retrieved March 8, 2003, from http://www.congressonlineproject.org/webstudy2003.html
80. Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2002). Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the U.S. political Web sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 222-244.
81. Fountain, J. E. (2001a). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
82. Fountain, J. E. (2001b). Paradoxes of public sector customer service. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(1), 55-73.
83. Fountain, J. E. (2003). Prospects for improving the regulatory process using e-rulemaking. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 43-44.
84. Galston, W. A. (2000). Civil society and the "art of association." Journal of Democracy, 11(1), 64-70.
85. Gant, D., & Gant, J. (2002). Enhancing e-service delivery. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
86. Garson, G. D. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of public information systems. New York: Dekker.
87. Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (1999). Party democracy on-line: UK parties and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 2(3), 340-367.
88. Greenberg, A. (1999). Reply to Pippa Norris's "Who surfs?" In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 95-98). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
89. Grönlund, Å. (2003). Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 55-75.
90. Hacker, K. L. (1996). Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization. Media, Culture & Society, 18(2), 213-232.
91. Hacker, K. L. & Todino, M. A. (1996). Virtual democracy at the Clinton White House: An experiment in electronic democratisation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(2). Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://www.cios.org/getfile\Hacker_V6N296
92. Hagemann, C. P. M. (2002, October). Information and communication traffic patterns on Dutch political Web sites. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Internet Research 3.0: Net / Work / Theory, Maastricht, NL.
93. Hagen, M. (2000). Digital democracy and political systems. In K. L. Hacker & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 54-69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94. Hague, B. N., & Loader, B. D. (Eds.). (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London: Routledge.
95. Hale, M., Musso, J., & Weare, C. (1999). Developing digital democracy: Evidence from Californian municipal Web pages. In B. N. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 96-115). London: Routledge.
96. Hanselmann, C. (2001, April). Electronically enhanced democracy in Canada. Retrieved September 19, 2002, from http://www.cwf.ca/abcalcwf/doc.nsf/Publications?ReadForm&Category=2001
97. Haque, M. S. (2002). E-governance in India: Its impacts on relations among citizens, politicians, and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65(2), 231-250.
98. Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development (i-Government Working Paper Series No. 11). Manchester, UK: Institute for Development Policy and Management.
99. Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
100. Hernon, P., & McClure, C. R. (1993). Electronic U.S. government information: Policy issues and directions. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28, 45-110.
101. Herring, S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 109-170.
102. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
104. Hoff, J., Horrocks, I., & Tops, P. (2000). Democratic governance and new technology: Technologically mediated innovations in political practice in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
105. Holm, B. E. (1976). National issues and problems. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 11, 5-26.
106. Horn, R. E. (1993). Needed: A new political literacy for electronic town meetings. Retrieved September 7, 2002, from http://www.stanford.edu/̃rhorn/NewPoliticalLiteracy.html
107. Horn, R. E., & Halley, A. A. (1995). Electronic town meetings. Retrieved October 7, 2003, from http://www.stanford.edu/̃rhorn/ETMSurvey.html
108. Howard, P. (2001). Can technology enhance democracy? The doubters' answer. Journal of Politics, 63(3), 949-955.
109. Hunold, C. (2001). Corporatism, pluralism, and democracy: Toward a deliberative theory of bureaucratic accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy & Administration, 74(2), 151-167.
110. International Teledemocracy Centre. (2003). Research aims. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/
111. Janda, K., Berry, J. M., & Goldman, J. (1995). The challenge of democracy: Government in America (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
112. Kalathil, S. (2001). The Internet and Asia: Broadband or broad bans? Foreign Service Journal, 78(2). Retrieved October 11, 2002, from http://www.ceip.org/files/Publications/internet_asia.asp
113. Kamarck, E. C. (1999). Campaigning on the Internet in the elections of 1998. In E. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
114. Kamarck, E. C. (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: Business as usual? In E. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com: Democracy in the information age. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
115. Keren, C., & Harmon, L. (1980). Information services issues in less developed countries. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 15, 289-324.
116. Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
117. Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for 21st century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
118. Kinder, T. (2002). Vote early, vote often? Tele-democracy in European cities. Public Administration, 80(3), 557-582.
119. King, D. C. (1999). Catching voters in the Web. In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 125-131). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
120. King, L. A. (2003). Deliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16(1), 23-50.
121. Klein, H. K. (1999). Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for citizen associations. The Information Society, 15(4), 213-220.
122. Klinenberg, E., & Perrin, A. (2000). Symbolic politics in the information age: The 1996 Republican presidential campaigns in Cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 3(1), 17-38.
123. Kling, R. (2000a). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232.
124. Kling, R. (2000b). Social informatics: A new perspective on social research about information and communication technologies. Prometheus, 18(3), 245-264.
125. Kling, R., & Callahan, E. (2003). Electronic Journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 127-177.
126. Kling, R., McKim, G., Fortuna, J., & King, A. (2000). Scientific collaboratories as socio-technical interaction networks: A theoretical approach (Working paper SCIT-5). Retrieved February 14, 2003, from http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.CY/0005007
127. Kluver, R. (2002, October). Internet campaign strategies in the 2001 Singapore general election. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Internet Research 3.0: Net / Work / Theory, Maastricht, NL.
128. Knownet. (n.d.). Digital governance: Building and sustaining democratic and accountable governance structures. Retrieved September 19, 2002, from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/knownet/digital.html
129. Kochen, M. (1983). Information and society. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 18, 277-304.
130. Kohut, A., & Rainie, L. (2000, December 3). Youth vote influenced by online information: Internet election news audience seeks convenience, familiar names. Retrieved February 28, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=27
131. La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & de Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34(4), 411-446.
132. Laidi, Z. (2002). Democracy in real time. Journal of Democracy, 13(3), 68-79.
133. Lal, B. (1999, October). Information and communication technologies for improved governance. Paper presented at the African Development Forum ADF '99: The Challenge to Africa of Globalisation and the Information Age, Addis Ababa, Ethiopa. Retrieved September 25, 2002, from http://www.abtassoc.com/reports/ict.pdf
134. Lang, S. (2000). NGOs, local governance, and political communication processes in Germany. Political Communication, 17(4), 383-387.
135. Larsen, E., & Rainie, L. (2002a, October 2). Digital town hall: How local officials use the Internet and the civic benefits they cite from dealing with constituents online. Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=74
136. Larsen, E., & Rainie, L. (2002b, April 3). The rise of the e-citizen: How people use government agencies' Web sites. Retrieved April 3, 2002, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=57
137. Lewis, D. (2002). Civil society in African contexts: Reflections on the usefulness of a concept. Development and Change, 33(4), 569-586.
138. Lievrouw, L., & Farb, S. (2003). Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 499-540.
139. Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. M. (Eds.). (2002). The handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs. London: Sage.
140. Lim, M. (2002). CyberCivic space in Indonesia: From panopticon to pandemonium? International Development Planning Review, 24, 383-400.
141. Löfgren, K. (2000). Danish political parties and new technology: Interactive parties or new shop windows? In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology (pp. 57-70). London: Routledge.
142. Lohmann, S. (2003). Why do institutions matter? An audience-cost theory of institutional commitment. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16(1), 95-110.
143. London, S. (1994). Electronic democracy: A literature survey. Retrieved January 30, 2003, from http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/ed.html
144. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
145. Macintosh, A. (n.d.). Electronic petitions and the Scottish Parliament. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/Projects/ Projects_Rowntree_e-petition_evaluation.asp
146. Macintosh, A., Robson, E., Smith, E., & Whyte, A. (2003). Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 43-54.
147. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2002). An evaluation framework for e-consultations? Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/iaoslondon2002/contributed_papers/IP_Macintosh.asp
148. Mackay, F., Richards, N., Stephenson, S., Webb, J., Boundy, C., & Gebhardt, B. (1998). Involving civil society in the work of parliaments. Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/government/devolution/cpsp-00.asp
149. MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
150. Malina, A., & Macintosh, A. (2002). E-democracy: Citizen engagement and evaluation. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/Abstracts/ e-Democracy_Citizen_engagement_and_evaluation.asp
151. Malina, A., Macintosh, A., & Davenport, E. (2001). E-petitioner: A monitoring and evaluation report. Retrieved January 25, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/ITC/Publications.asp
152. Mansbridge, J. (1994). Public spirit in political systems. In H. J. Aaron, T. E. Mann, & T. Taylor (Eds.), Values and public policy (pp. 146-172). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
153. Marchionini, G. (2002). Co-evolution of user and organizational interfaces: A longitudinal case study of WWW dissemination of national statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 1192-1209.
154. Marchionini, G., Samet, H., & Brandt, L. (2003). Digital government. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 25-27.
155. McDonald, D. D. (1982). Public sector/private sector interaction in information services. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 17, 83-90.
156. Mechling, J. (1999). Information age governance: Just the start of something big? In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 169-191). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
157. Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5-22.
158. Miani, M. (2000, September). Civic networks: A comparative view. Paper presented at the First Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Lawrence, KS.
159. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, UK: Berg.
160. Milward, H., & Snyder, L. (1996). Electronic government: Linking citizens to public organizations through technology. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 261-276.
161. Mohen, J., & Glidden, J. (2001). The case for Internet voting. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 72-85.
162. Mok, J. K.-H. (2002). From nationalization to marketization: Changing governance in Taiwan's higher-education system. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 15(2), 137-159.
163. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-434.
164. Morison, J., & Newman, D. R. (2001). On-line citizenship: Consultation and participation in New Labour's Britain and beyond. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 15(2), 171-194.
165. Morrell, M. E. (1999). Citizens' evaluations of participatory democratic procedures: Normative theory meets empirical science. Political Research Quarterly, 52(2), 293-322.
166. Muir, A., & Oppenheim, C. (2002). National information policy developments worldwide I: Electronic government. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 173-186.
167. Musso, J., & Weare, C. (2000). Designing Web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy. Political Communication, 17(1), 1-20.
168. Nath, V. (2000). Using information and communication technology (ICT) to catalyze efforts towards good governance in developing countries. Retrieved January 20, 2003, from www.cddc.vt.edu/digitalgov/
169. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2001). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 17-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
170. Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-government and e-democracy: A comparison of opportunities in the north and south. Gazette, 64(5), 467-477.
171. Nixon, P., & Johansson, H. (1999). Transparency through technology: The Internet and political parties. In B. N. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 135-153). London: Routledge.
172. Nixon, P. G. (2000). Whitehall on-line: Joined-up government? In R. Gibson & S. Ward (Eds.), Reinvigorating democracy? British politics and the Internet (pp. 27-46). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
173. Norris, P. (Ed.) (1999a). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. New York: Oxford University Press.
174. Norris, P. (1999b). Who surfs? New technology, old voters & virtual democracy. In E. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 71-98). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
175. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
176. Norris, P. (2002). Revolution, what revolution? The Internet and U.S. elections, 1992-2000. In E. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com:Democracy in the information age (pp. 59-80). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
177. Nugent, J. D. (2001). If e-democracy is the answer, what's the question? National Civic Review, 90(3), 221-234.
178. Nye, J. S. (2002). Information technology and democratic governance. In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com: Democracy in the information age (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
179. Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Why people don't trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
180. Öberg, P. (2002). Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation? Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 15(4), 455-475.
181. Okot-Uma, R. W. O. (n.d.). Electronic governance: Re-inventing good governance. Retrieved October 10, 2002, from http://www1.worldbank.org/pblicsector/egov/Okot-Uma.pdf
182. O'Loughlin, B. (2001). The political implications of digital innovations: Trade-offs of democracy and liberty in the developed world. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 595-614.
183. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). Civil society and the OECD (Policy brief). Retrieved September 19, 2002, from www.oecd.org/publications/Pol_brief/
184. Orvis, S. (2001). Civil society in Africa or African civil society? Journal of Asian and African Studies, 36(1), 17-38.
185. Oskarsdóttir, S. (n.d.). Power and public policy: The forging of social partnerships. Retrieved November 12, 2002, from www.abo.fi/norden/europa/konferens/Oskardottir_Stefania.pdf
186. Ott, D. (1998). Power to the people: The role of electronic media in promoting democracy in Africa. FirstMonday, 3(4). Retrieved September 26, 2002, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_4/ott/
187. Palmquist, R. A. (1992). The impact of information technology on the individual. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 17, 3-42.
188. Pardo, T. A. (2000). Realizing the promise of digital government: It's more than building a Web site. Information Impacts Magazine, 3(11). Retrieved October 20, 2002, from http://www.cisp.org/imp/october_2000/10_00pardo.htm
189. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
190. Percy-Smith, J. (2000). Local government and ICTs: 21st century governance? In R. Gibson & S. Ward (Eds.), Reinvigorating democracy? British politics and the Internet (pp. 47-65). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
191. Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
192. Pescosolido, B. A., & Rubin, B. A. (2000). The Web of Group Affiliations revisited: Social life, postmodernism, and sociology. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 52-76.
193. Pirie, M. (1991). The citizens' charter. London: Adam Smith Institute.
194. Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). Unsolved mysteries: The Tocqueville files II. The downside of social capital. The American Prospect online, 7(26). Retrieved May 16, 2001, from http://www.prospect.org/print/V7/26/26-cnt2.html
195. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39-55.
196. Puopolo, S. (2001). The Web and U.S. senatorial campaigns 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2030-2048.
197. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
198. Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
199. Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
200. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
201. Queensland Government. (2002). Community engagement. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://www.premiers.qld.gov.au/about/community/democracy.htm
202. Reilly, K. (2002a). Government ICT use in Central America: A view from civil society. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://Katherine.Reilly.net/docs/fullreport/chapters1-3.pdf
203. Reilly, K. (2002b). Government, ICTs and civil society in Central America: Is national government ICT use contributing to more democratic states?
204. Reilly, K. (2002c). Government, ICTs and civil society in Central America (working paper 3): Defining e-governance and e-democracy in Central America for action. Retrieved September 18, 2002, from http://katherine.reilly.net/e-governance/reports.html
205. Rice, R. E. (2002). Primary issues in Internet use: Access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. M. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 105-129). London: Sage.
206. Richard, E. (1999). Tools of governance. In B. N. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 73-86). London: Routledge.
207. Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. (2001). Emergence and influence of the Zapatista social netwar. In J. Arquilla & D. Ronfeldt (Eds.), Networks and netware: The future of terror, crime, and militancy (pp. 171-199). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
208. Rosenberg, V. (1982). National information policies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 17, 3-32.
209. Sawyer, S., & Eschenfelder, K. R. (2002). Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 427-467.
210. Schalken, K. (2000). Virtual communities: New public spheres on the Internet? In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology (pp. 153-170). London: Routledge.
211. Schalken, K., & Tops, P. (1995). Democracy and virtual communities: An empirical exploration of the Amsterdam Digital City. In W. B. J. van de Donk, I. T. M. Snellen, & P. W. Tops (Eds.), Orwell in Athens: A perspective on informaitzation and democracy (pp. 143-154). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
212. Schement, J. (2001). Of gaps by which democracy we measure. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 303-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
213. Schmidtke, O. (1998). Berlin in the Net: Prospects of cyberdemocracy from above and from below. In R. Tsagarousianou, D. Tambini, & C. Bryan (Eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks (pp. 60-83). London: Routledge.
214. Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85-131.
215. Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is ... and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88.
216. Schneider, S. M. (2000). Political portals and democracy: Threats and promises. Information Impacts Magazine, 5. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.cisp.org/imp/may_2000/05_00schneider.htm
217. Schneider, S. M. (2001, January 10). Congressional candidate Web sites in campaign 2000. Retrieved November 6, 2002, from http://web.archive.org/web/20010602192820/netelection.org/research/jan10report. pdf
218. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2002a, October). Candidate Web presence in the 2002 U.S. electoral Web sphere. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Internet Research 3.0: Net / Work / Theory, Maastricht, NL.
219. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2002b). Online structure for political action: Exploring presidential campaign Web sites from the 2000 American election. Javnost-the Public, 9(2), 43-60.
220. Schneider, S. M., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). Congressional candidate Web sites in campaign 2000: What Web enthusiasts wanted, what candidates provided. Pittsburgh, PA: The Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
221. Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
222. Schuler, D. (2001). Computer professionals and the next culture of democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 52-57.
223. Seifert, J., & Petersen, R. (2001, September). The promise of all things E? Expectations and implications of electronic government. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco. Retrieved September 19, 2002, from http://pro.harvard.edu/abstracts/040/040004ChadwickAn.htm
224. Servon, L. J. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community, and public policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
225. Simons, J. (2001). Cheap computers bridge digital divide. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 289-291). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
226. Smith, C. (2000). British political parties: Continuity and change in the information age. In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology (pp. 71-85). London: Routledge.
227. Smith, E., & Macintosh, A. (2001). "What sort of Scotland do we want to live in?" Electronic consultation study analysis of comments. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/Documents/Analysis-of-comments-received.pdf
228. Starobin, P. (1996, May 25). Politics - On the square. National Journal Magazine, 1145-1149.
229. Steyaert, J. (2000). Local governments online and the role of the resident: Government shop versus electronic community. Social Science Computer Review, 18(1), 3-16.
230. Stokes, S. C. (1998). Pathologies of deliberation. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 123-139). New York: Cambridge University Press.
231. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000a). Democratizing democracy: Strong democracy, US political campaigns and the Internet. Democratization, 7(1), 36-58.
232. Stromer-Galley, J. (2000b). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111-132.
233. Stromer-Galley, J., & Foot, K. A. (2002). Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1). Retrieved March 14, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue1/stromerandfoot.html
234. Stromer-Galley, J., Foot, K. A., Schneider, S. M., & Larsen, E. (2001). How citizens used the Internet in election 2000. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Elections in the age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States (pp. 21-26). London: Hansard Society. Retrieved November 6, 2002, from http://www.btinterface.co.uk/reports/report_pdfs/hansard_usa/ pg21_26_howcitizensuse.pdf
235. Strover, S., & Straubhaar, J. (2000). Assessing citizen utilization of e-government services: A survey of issues and attitudes in Texas. Government Finance Review, 16, 27-32.
236. Sunstein, C. (2001). republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
237. Surprenant, T. T. (1985). Global threats to information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20, 3-26.
238. Tambini, D. (1998). Civic networking and universal rights to connectivity: Bologna. In R. Tsagarousianou, D. Tambini, & C. Bryan (Eds.), Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks (pp. 84-109). London: Routledge.
239. Tambini, D. (1999). New media and democracy: The civic networking movement. New Media & Society, 1(3), 305-329.
240. Taylor, J., & Burt, E. (2001). Not-for-profits in the democratic polity. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 58-62.
241. Taylor Nelson Sofres. (2001). Government online study 2001. London: TNS. Retrieved October 1, 2002, from http://www.tnsofres.com/gostudy/gostudydownload.pdf
242. Tettey, W. J. (2001). Information technology and democratic participation in Africa. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 36(1), 133-153.
243. Thompson, C. S. (2002). Recruiting cyber townspeople: Local government and the Internet in a rural Japanese township. Technology in Society, 24(3), 349-360.
244. Tocqueville, A. de. (1969). Democracy in America. (J. P. Mayer, Ed., G. Lawrence, Trans.) Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (Original work published in 1835)
245. Tops, P., Voerman, G., & Boogers, M. (2000). Political Websites during the 1998 Parliamentary elections in the Netherlands. In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology (pp. 87-99). London: Routledge.
246. Toregas, C. (2001). The politics of e-government: The upcoming struggle for redefining civic engagement. National Civic Review, 90(3), 235-240.
247. Tsagarousianou, R. (1998). Back to the future of democracy? New technologies, civic networks and direct democracy in Greece. In R. Tsagarousianou, D. Tambini, & C. Bryan (Eds.), Cyber democracy: Technology, cities and civic networks (pp. 41-59). London: Routledge.
248. Tsagarousianou, R., Tambini, D., & Bryan, C. (Eds.). (1998). Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks. London: Routledge.
249. United Nations Online Network in Public Administration and Finance. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. Assessing the progress of the UN member states. New York: UNPAN. Retrieved October 1, 2002, from http://unpanl.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan003984.pdf
250. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). The changing shape of the nation's income distribution, 1947-98 (Current Population Reports No. P60-204). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
251. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Poverty in the United States: 2000 (Current Population Reports No. P60-214). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
252. Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved November 7, 2002, from http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/uslaner/uslaner5.pdf
253. Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Trust, civic engagement, and the Internet. Retrieved January 4, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org/papers/paperspdf/UMD_Uslaner_Trust.pdf
254. van Dijk, J. (2000). Widening information gaps and policies of prevention. In K. L. Hacker & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 166-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
255. van Dijk, J. A. (1996). Models of democracy: Behind the design and use of new media in politics. Electronic Journal of Communication, 6(2). Retrieved April 18, 2003, from http://www.cios.org/getfile\Dijk_V6N296
256. van Koert, R. (2002). The impact of democratic deficits on electronic media in rural development. FirstMonday, 7(4). Retrieved April 2, 2002, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/koert/
257. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
258. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Race, ethnicity, and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4,), 453-497.
259. Verweij, M., & Josling, T. E. (2003). Special issue: Deliberately democratizing multilateral organizations [Special issue]. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16(1), 1-21.
260. Watts, D. J. (2003, February 14). Unraveling the mysteries of the connected age. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B7-B9.
261. Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26-42.
262. Webster, P. (1999). Democracy and information in a network society. In S. Criddle, L. Dempsey, & R. Heseltine (Eds.), Information landscapes for a learning society: Networking and the future of libraries 3 (pp. 235-254). London: Library Association.
263. Weissberg, R. (2001). Democratic political competence: Clearing the underbrush and a controversial proposal. Political Behavior, 23(3), 257-284.
264. Weissberg, R. (2002). Polling, policy, and public opinion: The case against heeding the "voice of the people." New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
265. Weissberg, R. (2003). Disentangling "political participation." Unpublished manuscript.
266. West, D. M. (2002a). Global e-government, 2002. Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt02int.html
267. West, D. M. (2002b). State and federal e-government in the United States, 2002. Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/Egovt02us.html
268. West, D. M. (2002c, September). Urban e-government, 2002. Retrieved January 29, 2003, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt02city.html
269. White, C. S. (1997). Citizen participation and the Internet: Prospects for civic deliberation in the information age. Social Studies, 88(1), 23-29.
270. Whyte, A. (2001). E-voter and the Highland youth voice elections. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/Documents/Youth_Summit_Results.pdf
271. Whyte, A., & Macintosh, A. (2000). Youth Summit 2000 e-consultation. Retrieved January 26, 2003, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC_Home/Documents/Youth_Summit_Results.pdf
272. Whyte, A., & Macintosh, A. (2001). Transparency and teledemocracy: Issues from an "e-consultation." Journal of Information Science, 27(4), 187-198.
273. Wilhelm, A. G. (2000). Democracy in the digital age. London: Routledge.
274. Wolin, S. S. (2001). Tocqueville between two worlds: The making of apolitical and theoretical life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
275. Zhang, J. (2002). Will the government "serve the people?" The development of Chinese e-government. New Media & Society, 4(2), 163-184.
276. Zouridis, S., & Bekkers, V. (2000). Electronic service delivery and the democratic relationships between government and its citizens. In J. Hoff, I. Horrocks, & P. Tops (Eds.), Democratic governance and new technology (pp. 123-135). London: Routledge.