The Case for Internet Voting

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 72-

  Mohen, Joe ^a   Glidden, Julia ^a  

^a Electioncom Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995600415     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/357489.357511     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. California Internet Voting Task Force (California Secretary of State). A Report on the Feasibility of Internet Voting (Jan. 2000); see www.ss.ca.gov/executive/ivote/.
2. Mortman, A. Hacking Arizona. NationalJournal.com (Mar. 10, 2000); see www.nationaljournal.com/members/buzz/2000/extreme/031000.htm.
3. Bradley, P. Inequality seen in voting via the Internet. Richmond Times-Dispatch (Apr. 2, 2000), C1.
4. California Internet Voting Task Force (California Secretary of State). A Report on the Feasibility of Internet Voting (Jan. 2000); see www.ss.ca.gov.
5. Committee for the Study of the American Electorate, Washington, D. C., report released Feb. 8, 1999.
6. Fairley Raney, R. Voting by the Internet: The mouse still hasn’t roared. New York Times (Jan. 30, 2000), B10.
7. Ledbetter, J. Net out the vote. Industry Standard (Mar. 20, 2000); see www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,13004,00.html.
8. Ledbetter, J. Virtual voting faces real-world concerns (Mar. 16, 2000); see slate.msn.com/netelection/entries/00-03-16_77458.asp.
9. McKenna, B. Web sites said powerless to foil hacker attacks. Globe and Mail (Apr. 7, 2000), B6.