Labeling of rDNA Biotechnology-Derived Foods the Institute of Food

Food Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 62-74

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0342306463     PISSN: 00156639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anonymous. 1999a. European Commission may tell Austria, Luxembourg to end GM corn ban. World Food Chemical News, March 3, pp. 11-12.
2. Anonymous. 1999b. Major European supermarkets ban GMOs in own-brand products. Food Regulation Weekly, March 22, p. 20.
3. Anonymous. 1999c. Food Control 10(6): 339-414.
4. Anonymous. 1999d. Methods for detection of GMO grain in commerce. Report prepared for Diag Work Group of the American Crop Protection Assn. www. acpa.org/public/issues/biotech/detectmeth.html.
5. Anonymous. 1999e. ADM joins Staley in rejecting some transgenic corn. Grainnet. April 14, www. grainnet.com/BreakingNews/articles.html?ID=3528.
6. Anonymous. 1999f. ADM to offer premium non-genetic soy. Reuters, May 5. biz.yahoo.com.
7. Anonymous. 2000. Frito-Lay will stop using genetically modified corn due to consumer concern. Food Labeling and Nutrition News, Feb. 9, p. 17.
8. Bender, M.M. and Derby, B.M. 1992. A prevalence of reacing nutritional information and ingredient information on food labels among adult Americans: 1982-1988. J. Nutr. Educ. 24(6): 292-297.
9. Bender, K., Hill, L., Wenzel, B., and Hornbaker, R. 1999. Alternative market channels for specialty corn and soybeans. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. AE-4726. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
10. Betts, K. 1999. Environmental news. Env. Sci. Technol. 33(23): 484A-485A.
11. Blanchfield, J.R. 1999. Personal communication. Consultant, London, U.K.
12. Buckwell, A., Brookes, G., and Bradley, D. 1999. "Economics of Identity Preservation for Genetically Modified Craps." Food Biotechnology Communications Initiative (unpublished work).
13. Bullock, D.S., Desquilbet, M., and Nitsi, E. 2000. The economics of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation. Presented at Ann. Mtg., Inst. of Food Technologists, Dallas, Tex., June 10-14. Available at www.aces.uiuc.edu/ACE/faculty/dallasbu.PDF.
14. Buzby, J.C. and Ready, R.C. 1996. Do consumers trust food safety information? Food Rev. 19(1): 46-49.
15. Codex. 1999. Report of the Twenty Seventh Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labelling, ALI-NORM 99/22A. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome.
16. Codex. 2000. Review of the Work by international Organizations on the Evaluation of the Safety and Nutrition Aspects of Foods Derived from RDNA Biotechnology. CX/FBT/00/3. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome.
17. Erickson, B.E. 2000. Detecting genetically modified products in food. Anal. Chem. 72(13): 454A-459A.
18. EU. 2000. Commission Regulation No 49/2000 of 10 January 2000 amending council regulation No 1139/98 produced from genetically modified organisms of particulars other than those provided for in Directive 79/112/EEC. Jan, 10. European Union, Brussels.
19. Eurobarometer. 2000. The Europeans and biotechnology Report prepared by INRA (Europe)-ECOSA. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/pdf/euroba-rometer-en.pdf.
20. FDA. 1986. Irradiation in the production, processing and handling of food. Food and Drug Admin., Fed. Reg. 51: 13376.
21. FDA. 1992. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. Food and Drug Admin., Fed. Reg. 57: 22984.
22. FDA. 1994. Interim guidance on the voluntary labeling of milk and milk products from cows that have not been treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. Food and Drug Admin., Fed. Reg. 59: 6279.
23. FMI. 1999. Consumer trends. Food Res. Group, Food Mktg. Inst., Washington, D.C.
24. FTC. 1994. Enforcement policy statement on food advertising. Federal Trade Comm., Fed. Reg. 59: 28388.
25. Gallup. 1999. What biotech food issue? Poll Release, Oct. 5, Gallup Organization. www.gallup.com/poll/ releases/pr991005.asp.
26. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M., Durant, J., and Allum, N. 1999. Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science 285: 384-387.
27. HHS. 2000. "FDA to Strengthen Pre-Market Review of Bioengineered Foods. News release. May 3. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.
28. Hoban, T.J. 1996. How Japanese consumers view biotechnology. Food Technol. 50(7): 85-88.
29. Hoban, T.J. 1997. Consumer acceotance of biotechnology: An international perspective. Nature Biotechnol. 15: 232-234.
30. Hoban, T.J. 1998. International acceptance of agricultural biotechnology. In "Agricultural Biotechnology and Environmental Quality: Gene Escape and Pest Resistance," ed. R.W.F. Hardy and J.B. Segelken, National Agricultural Biotechnology Council Report No. 10, pp. 59-73. Natl. Agricultural Biotechnology Council, Ithaca, N.Y.
31. Hoban, T.J. 2000. Personal conmunication. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
32. Hoban, T. and Kendall, P.A. 1993. Consumer attitudes about the use of biotechnology in agriculture and food production. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
33. Kelley, J. 1995. Public perceptions of genetic engineering: Australia, 1994. Report prepared for Dept. of Industry, Science and Technology, Commonwealth of Australia, by Intl. Survey Program, Australian Natl. Univ.
34. NIN. 1999. Voluntary labeling of foods from biotechnology. Report on a qualitative study among Canadian consumers by the National Institute of Nutrition. Office of Biotechnology, Canadian Food Inspection Agency. www.cfia-acia.agr.ca/english/ppc/biotech/ ninreport.htm.
35. Nelson, G.C., De Pinto, A., Bullock, D., Nitsi, E.I., Rosegrant, M., Josling, T., Babinard, J., Cunningham. C., Unnevehr, L., and Hill, L. 1999. The economics and politics of genetically modified organisms in agriculture: Implications for WTO 2000. Bull. 809, Office of Research Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
36. Rodolfo, M.N., Lipinski, D., and Savur, N. 1998. Consumers' use of nutritional labels while food shopping and at home. J Consumer Affairs 32(1): 106-120.
37. Tordjman, A.S. 1995. Trends in Europe. Report prepared for the Food Mktg. Inst., Washington, D.C.
38. USDA. 2000. National organic program: Proposed rule. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Fed. Reg. 65: 13512.
39. USDS. 2000. Fact sheet: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Office of the Spokesman, U.S. Dept. of State, Washington, D.C., Feb. 16 www.state.gov/ www/global/oes/montreal_2000-01_index.html.
40. White House. 2000. Clinton Administration agencies announce food and agricultural biotechnology initiatives: Strengthening science-based regulation and consumer access to information. http:/vm.cfsan. fda.gov/~lrd/whbio53.html.
41. Wirthlin Worldwide. 2000. U.S. consumer attitudes toward food biotechnology. Survey conducted for the Intl. Food Information Council, Washington, D.C.