Beyond tele-substitution: Disaggregate longitudinal structural equations modeling of communication impacts

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 33-52

  Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^a   Meenakshisundaram, Ravikumar ^a  

^a Davis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TELECOMMUNICATION;

COMPLEMENTARITY EFFECTS; DISAGGREGATE LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS; TELE-SUBSTITUTION;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; DAVIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032854940     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00010-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arbuckle, J.L., 1997. AMOS Users' Guide Version 3.6. SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, IL.
2. Axhausen, K.W., 1995. Travel diary content: a brief review of its development. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
3. Axhausen, K.W., 1997. Data needs of activity scheduling models. In: Ettema, D.F., Timmermans, H.J.P. (Eds.), Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, Elsevier, Tarrytown, NY, pp. 229-241.
4. Balepur, P., 1998. Impacts of computer-mediated communication on travel and communication patterns: the Davis Community Network study. Master's Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, March.
5. Claisse, G., Rowe, F., 1993. Domestic telephone habits and daily mobility. Transportation Research A 27 (4), 277-290.
6. Dwyer, J.H., 1983. Statistical Models for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. Golob, T., 1990. Structural equation modelling of travel choice dynamics. In: Peter, J. (Ed.), Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Gower Publishing, Brookfield, VT.
8. Gould, J., Golob, T., 1997. Shopping without travel or travel without shopping? An investigation of electronic home shopping. Transport Reviews 17 (4).
9. Gould, J., Golob, T., Barwise, P., 1998. Why do people drive to shop? Future travel and telecommunication trade-offs. Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January.
10. Greene, W.H., 1995. LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual. Econometric Software, Bellport, New York.
11. Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), 1995. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
12. Hoyle, R.H., Panter, A.T., 1995. Writing about structural equation models. Chapter 9. In: Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 158-176.
13. KMPG, 1997. The influence of the information society on traffic and transportation. Final report. Prepared by KMPG Bureau for Economic Research and Documentation for the Ministry of Transport, Public Works, and Water Management of The Netherlands (Transport Research Center), Rotterdam, October, ISBN no. 903693603.
14. Lu, X., Pas, E.I., 1999. Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior. Transportation Research A 33 (1), 1-18.
15. Moberg, A., 1993. Satellitkontor: En Studie av Kommunikationsmönster vid Arbete pâ Distans (in Swedish), Thesis No. 406. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Sweden.
16. Mokhtarian, P.L., 1990. A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation. Transportation Research A 24 (3), 231-242.
17. Mokhtarian, P.L., 1998. A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban Studies 35 (2), 215-241.
18. Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L., Salomon, I., 1995. Methodological issues in the estimation of travel, energy, and air quality impacts of telecommuting. Transportation Research A 29 (4), 283-302.
19. Mokhtarian, P.L., Meenakshisundaram, R., 1998. Beyond tele-substitution: a broader empirical look at communication impacts. California PATH Working Paper UCB-ITS-PWP-98-33, prepared for Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California, under MOU 279. Available on the web at http://www.path.berkeley.edu/PATH/Publications/PATH/PWP-98-33.pdf.
20. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 1997. Emerging travel patterns: do telecommunications make a difference? Resource paper presented at the Eighth Meeting of the International Association for Travel Behavior Research, Austin, TX, 21-25 September.
21. Mueller, R.O., 1996. Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer, New York.
22. Niles, J. 1994. Beyond telecommuting: a new paradigm for the effect of telecommunications on travel. Prepared for the US Department of Energy, Offices of Energy Research and Scientific Computing, Washington, DC 20585, Report No. DOE/ER-0626, September. Available from NTIS, and on the web at http://www.lbl.gov/ICSD/Niles.
23. Pas, E.I., 1997. Time use and travel demand modeling: recent developments and current challenges. Resource paper presented at the Eighth'Meeting of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, TX, 21-25 September in Mokh. & Salo citation.
24. Salomon, I., 1986. Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review. Transportation Research A 20 (3), 223-238.
25. Spittje, H.D., 1994. Tele/homework and time use/travel behaviour. Paper for presentation at IATAR Conference, 18-23 July, Bielefeld, Germany. Contact: H.D.Spittje@trc.rug.nl.
26. West, S.O., Finch, J.F., Curran, P.J., 1995. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies. Chapter 4. In: Hoyle, R.H. (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 56-75.
27. Zumkeller, D., 1996. Communication as an element of the overall transport context - an empirical study. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, pp. 66-83.