Detailed analysis of the fidelity of quantum teleportation using photons: Considering real experimental parameters

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 423141-423146

  Tsujino, Kenji ^a   Takeuchi, Shigeki ^a,b   Sasaki, Keiji ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; FLUORESCENCE; PHOTONS; POLARIZATION; QUANTUM EFFICIENCY;

TELEPORTATION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4243777822     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042314     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. C.H. Bennett and G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
2. J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, and H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998).
3. H.-J. Briegel, W. Dur, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998).
4. D. Gottesman and I.L. Chuang, Nature (London) 401, 390 (1999).
5. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997).
6. S.L. Braunstein and H.J. Kimble, Nature (London) 394, 840 (1998).
7. P. Kok and S.L. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042304 (2000).
8. Stephen D. Bartlett, Eleni Diamanti, Barry C. Sanders, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto, e-print quant-ph/0204073.
9. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeillinger, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 279 (2000).
10. Y.-H. Kim, S.P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. A 62, 011802 (2000).
11. R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
12. S. Massar and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995).
13. J. Kim, S. Takeuchi, Y. Yamamoto, and H.H. Hogue, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 902 (1999).
14. S. Takeuchi, J. Kim, Y. Yamamoto, and H.H. Hogue, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1063 (1999).
15. 1 was reduced from 88% to 70% by optical misalignment.
16. 4 cps, according to the existing experiments.
17. 2 in the previous analysis.) In the previous result, we found a decrease of fidelity with increasing cascade number, however, this may not be physically understandable. According to our analysis, this kind of error can be made by a mistake in the order of calculating Eq. (3.8).
18. A VLPC is regarded as an infinite cascade of detectors, as is explained in Sec. IV.
19. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G.J. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
20. H.F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. A 66, 024308 (2002).
21. H.F. Hofmann, K. Tsujino, and S. Takeuchi, e-print quant-ph/0111109.