Control of Lactobacillus contaminants in continuous fuel ethanol fermentations by constant or pulsed addition of penicillin G

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 62, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 498-502

  Bayrock, D P ^a   Thomas, K C ^a   Ingledew, W M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; FUEL; PENICILLIN G;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MICROBIOLOGY;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BATCH FERMENTATION; CONTINUOUS FERMENTATION; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI; NONHUMAN; PULSED ADDITION OF ANTIBIOTIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOREACTORS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; LACTIC ACID; LACTOBACILLUS; PENICILLIN G; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI; POSIBACTERIA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0242659250     PISSN: 01757598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-003-1324-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aquarone E (1960) Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. Appl Microbiol 8:263-268
2. Bayrock D (2002) Application of multistage continuous culture to VHG-based ethanol fermentations: performance and control of bacteria by pH and pulsed addition of antibiotic. PhD Thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Canada
3. Bayrock D, Ingledew WM (2001a) Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:87-93
4. Bayrock D, Ingledew WM (2001b) Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:39-45
5. Berg C (2002) World production and trade. In: Proceedings of World Ethanol 2002 Conference, 5 November 2002, London, UK
6. Bischoff KB (1966) Optimal continuous fermentation reactor design. Can J Chem Eng 44:281-284
7. Chang IS, Kim BH, Shin PK, Lee WK (1995) Bacterial contamination and its effects on ethanol fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 5:309-314
8. Connolly C (1999) Bacterial contaminants and their effects on alcohol production. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, pp 317-334
9. Cysewski GR, Wilkie CW (1978) Process design and economic studies of alternative fermentation methods for the production of ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 20:1421-1430
10. Day WH, Serjak WC, Stratton JR, Stone L (1954) Contamination inhibition: antibiotics as contamination-control agents in grain alcohol fermentations. J Agric Food Chem 2:252-258
11. Ghose TK, Tyagi RD (1979) Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate. I. Batch versus continuous systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1387-1400
12. Herbert D (1962) Multi-stage continuous culture. In: Malek I, Berans K, Hospodka J (eds) Continuous cultivation of microorganisms. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium, Czechoslovak Academy of Science, Prague, pp 23-34
13. Hynes SH, Kjarsgaard DM, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (1997) Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 18:284-291
14. Ingledew WM, Burton JD (1980) Membrane filtration: survival of brewing microbes on the membrane during storage at reduced humidities. J Am Soc Brew Chem 38:125-129
15. Kelsall DR, Lyons TP (1999) Management of fermentations in the production of alcohol: moving toward 23% ethanol. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, pp 25-38
16. Kheirolomoom A, Kazemi-Vaysari A, Ardjmand M, Baradar-Khoshfetrat A (1999) The combined effects of pH and temperature on penicillin G decomposition and its stability modeling. Process Biochem 35:205-211
17. Makanjuola DR, Springham DG (1984) Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from different stages of malt and whisky distillery fermentations. J Inst Brew 90:13-19
18. Narendranath NV, Hynes SH, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (1997) Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4158-463
19. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2001) Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26:171-177
20. Sinclair CG, Cantero D (1990) Fermentation modeling. In: McNeil B, Harvey LM (eds) Fermentation: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, London, pp 65-112
21. Stroppa CT, Andrietta MGS, Andrietta SR, Steckelberg C, Serra GE (2000) Use of penicillin and monensin to control bacterial contamination of Brazilian alcohol fermentations. Int Sugar J 102:78-82
22. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2002) Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1616-1623
23. Tyagi RD, Ghose TK (1980) Batch and multistage continuous ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate and optimum design of fermentor by graphical analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:1907-1928
24. Virkajärvi I, Kronlöf J (1998) Long-term stability of immobilized yeast columns in primary fermentation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 56:70-75
25. Wall JB, Hill GA (1992) Optimum CFST bioreactor design: experimental study using batch growth parameters for Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing ethanol. Can J Chem Eng 70:148-152