The integration of spatial context information in an experimental knowledge-based system and the supervised relaxation algorithm—two successful approaches to improving SPOT-XS classification

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 17, Issue 16, 1996, Pages 3093-3106

  Kontoes, C C ^a   Rokos, D ^b  

^a Laboratory for Remote Sensing ^*  (Greece)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LAND USE; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY;

DEMPSTER SHAFER REASONING SCHEME; SPATIAL CONTEXT INFORMATION; SUPERVISED RELAXATION ALGORITHM;

REMOTE SENSING;

CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM; LAND USE CLASS; SPOT-XS; SUPERVISED RELAXATION ALGORITHM; TEXTURE;

EID: 0030292078     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431169608949132     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Argialas, D. P., and Harlow, C. A., 1990, Computational image interpretation models: an overview and a perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 871-886.
2. Cibula, W. G., And Nyquist, M. O., 1987, Use of topographic and climatological models in a geographic data base to improve Landsat MSS classification for Olympic National Park. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53, 67-75.
3. Crvco, D. L., 1989, Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 1303-1309.
4. De Long, S. M., and Riezebos, H. T., 1991, Use of a GIS data base as a priori knowledge in multi-spectral land cover classification. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on GIS. EGIS'91 (Utrecht: EGIS Foundation), 1, pp.503-508.
5. Duda, R. O., and Hart, P. E., 1973, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (California: Wiley Interscience Publication, Stanford Research Institute).
6. Faugeras, O. D., and Pratt, W. K., 1980, Decorrelation methods of texture feature extraction. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2, 323-332.
7. Gilbert, E. S., 1969, The effect of unequal variance-covariance matrices on Fisher's linear discriminant functions. Biometrics, 25, 505-516.
8. Gordon, J., and Shortliffe, E. H., 1985, A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space. Artificial lntelligence, 26, 323-357.
9. Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, Its’Hak, 1973, Textural features for image classification. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics, 3, 610-621.
10. Jones, A. R., Settle, J. J., and Wyatt, B. K., 1988, Use of digital terrain data in the interpretation of SPOT-I HRV Multi-spectral imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9, 669-682.
11. Marks, S., and Dunn, J. O., 1974, Discriminant functions when covariance matrices are unequal. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 555-557.
12. Merchant, J. W., 1984, Using Spatial Logic in Classification of Landsat TM Data (Kansas: University of Kansas, Space Technology Centre).
13. Morrison, D. F., 1976, Multivariate Statistical Methods (London: McGraw-Hill) Series in Probability and Statistics, 2nd edn.
14. Peddle, D. R., and Franklin, S. E., 1991, Image texture processing and data integration for surface pattern discrimination. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57, 413-420.
15. Richards, J. A., Landgrebe, D. A., and Swain, P. H., 1981, Pixel labelling by supervised probabilistic relaxation. I.E.E.E. Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 3, 181-191.
16. Rokos, D., 1988, Cybernetics and remote sensing methodology; a dialectic interdisciplinary and integrated approach. Archives XVll, International Congress of the ISPRS, 27, Part B7, Commission VII, pp.460-469.
17. Shettigara, V. K., 1991, Robustness of Gaussian maximum likelihood and linear discriminant classifiers. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Lgarss'91), Helsinki (New York: I.E.E.E.), Vol. 3, Pp. 1839-1842.
18. Skidmore, A. K., and Turner, B. J., 1988, Forest mapping accuracies are improved using a supervised nonparametric classifier with SPOT data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1415-1421.
19. Skidmore, A. K., 1989, An expert system classifies eucalypt forest types using Thematic Mapper data and a digital terrain model. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 1449-1464.
20. Strahler, A. H., Logan, T. L., and Bryant, N. A., 1978, Improving forest cover classification accuracy from Landsat by incorporating topographic information. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (Michigan: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan), 2, 927-942.
21. Tong, L., Richards, J. A., and Swain, P. H., 1987, Probabilistic and evidential approaches for multi-source data analysis, I.E.E.E, Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 25, 283-293.
22. Weszka, J. S., Over, C. R., and Rosenfeld, A., 1976, A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification, I.E.E.E. Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybemetics. 6, 269-285.
23. Zucker, S. W., and Mohammed, J., 1978, Analysis of probabilistic relaxation labelling processes. Proceedings of the I.E.E.E. Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, Chicago, IL(New York: I.E.E.E.), pp. 307-312.