Systems biology in neuroscience: Bridging genes to cognition

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 577-582

  Grant, Seth G N ^a,b  

^a Division of Clinical Neurosciences   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; CELL ACTIVITY; COGNITION; GENE MAPPING; GENOMICS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STANDARDIZATION; SYNAPSE; YEAST;

EID: 0242571954     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2003.09.016     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Bertalanffy LV: General System Theory; Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: G Braziller; 1969.
2. Kitano H: Foundations of Systems Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
3. Dujon B., Albermann K., Aldea M., Alexandraki D., Ansorge W., Arino J., Benes V., Bohn C., Bolotin-Fukuhara M., Bordonne R., et al. The nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XV. Nature. 387:1997;98-102.
4. Philippsen P., Kleine K., Pohlmann R., Dusterhoft A., Hamberg K., Hegemann J.H., Obermaier B., Urrestarazu L.A., Aert R., Albermann K., et al. The nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XIV and its evolutionary implications. Nature. 387:1997;93-98.
5. Johnston M., Hillier L., Riles L., Albermann K., Andre B., Ansorge W., Benes V., Bruckner M., Delius H., Dubois E., et al. The nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XII. Nature. 387:1997;87-90.
6. Bussey H., Storms R.K., Ahmed A., Albermann K., Allen E., Ansorge W., Araujo R., Aparicio A., Barrell B., Badcock K., et al. The nucleotide sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XVI. Nature. 387:1997;103-105.
7. Horak C.E., Snyder M. Global analysis of gene expression in yeast. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2:2002;171-180.
8. Phizicky E., Bastiaens P.I., Zhu H., Snyder M., Fields S. Protein analysis on a proteomic scale. Nature. 422:2003;208-215.
9. Uetz P., Giot L., Cagney G., Mansfield T.A., Judson R.S., Knight J.R., Lockshon D., Narayan V., Srinivasan M., Pochart P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
10. Ho Y., Gruhler A., Heilbut A., Bader G.D., Moore L., Adams S.L., Millar A., Taylor P., Bennett K., Boutilier K., et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 415:2002;180-183.
11. Gavin A.C., Bosche M., Krause R., Grandi P., Marzioch M., Bauer A., Schultz J., Rick J.M., Michon A.M., Cruciat C.M., et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 415:2002;141-147 The authors systematically affinity-tagged endogenous proteins and analysed isolated protein complexes using mass spectrometry. This map of the eukaryotic proteome at the level of protein complexes reveals several hundred molecular machines.
12. Mann M., Ong S.E., Gronborg M., Steen H., Jensen O.N., Pandey A. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol. 20:2002;261-268.
13. Ficarro S.B., McCleland M.L., Stukenberg P.T., Burke D.J., Ross M.M., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., White F.M. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:2002;301-305 The authors applied global phosphoproteomic strategy to large-scale analysis of yeast proteins.
14. Ideker T., Thorsson V., Ranish J.A., Christmas R., Buhler J., Eng J.K., Bumgarner R., Goodlett D.R., Aebersold R., Hood L. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science. 292:2001;929-934 This study is an example of large-scale transcriptome and proteome analysis superimposed on mutations and environmental stimuli that can be used to predict biological functions.
15. Ozier O., Amin N., Ideker T. Global architecture of genetic interactions on the protein network. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:2003;490-491.
16. Fromont-Racine M., Rain J.C., Legrain P. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat. Genet. 16:1997;277-282.
17. Schwikowski B., Uetz P., Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:2000;1257-1261.
18. Tucker C.L., Gera J.F., Uetz P. Towards an understanding of complex protein networks. Trends Cell Biol. 11:2001;102-106.
19. Buchanan M: Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks, edn 1. New York: WW Norton; 2002.
20. Barabasi A-L: Linked: the New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing; 2002.
21. Bollobâas B: Random Graphs. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985.
22. Barabasi A.L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 286:1999;509-512.
23. Jeong H., Tombor B., Albert R., Oltvai Z.N., Barabasi A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature. 407:2000;651-654.
24. Jeong H., Mason S.P., Barabasi A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 411:2001;41-42 The authors used mathematical modelling of the yeast proteome to show that scale-free architecture of the interactome predicts viability following mutations.
25. Fox J.J., Hill C.C. From topology to dynamics in biochemical networks. Chaos. 11:2001;809-815.
26. Kamme F., Salunga R., Yu J., Tran D.T., Zhu J., Luo L., Bittner A., Guo H.Q., Miller N., Wan J., et al. Single-cell microarray analysis in hippocampus CA1: demonstration and validation of cellular heterogeneity. J. Neurosci. 23:2003;3607-3615.
27. Walikonis R.S., Jensen O.N., Mann M., Provance D.W. Jr., Mercer J.A., Kennedy M.B. Identification of proteins in the postsynaptic density fraction by mass spectrometry. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;4069-4080.
28. 2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the postsynaptic density by protein sequencing and mass spectrometry. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290:2002;948-954.
29. Phillips G.R., Huang J.K., Wang Y., Tanaka H., Shapiro L., Zhang W., Shan W.S., Arndt K., Frank M., Gordon R.E., et al. The presynaptic particle web: ultrastructure, composition, dissolution, and reconstitution. Neuron. 32:2001;63-77.
30. Satoh K., Takeuchi M., Oda Y., Deguchi-Tawarada M., Sakamoto Y., Matsubara K., Nagasu T., Takai Y. Identification of activity-regulated proteins in the postsynaptic density fraction. Genes Cells. 7:2002;187-197.
31. Kim M., Jiang L.H., Wilson H.L., North R.A., Surprenant A. Proteomic and functional evidence for a P2X7 receptor signalling complex. EMBO J. 20:2001;6347-6358.
32. Becamel C., Alonso G., Galeotti N., Demey E., Jouin P., Ullmer C., Dumuis A., Bockaert J., Marin P. Synaptic multiprotein complexes associated with 5-HT(2C) receptors: a proteomic approach. EMBO J. 21:2002;2332-2342.
33. Husi H., Ward M.A., Choudhary J.S., Blackstock W.P., Grant S.G.N. Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor - adhesion protein signaling complexes. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;661-669.
34. Husi H, Choudhary J, Yu L, Cumiskey M, Blackstock WP, Visscher PM, Armstrong JD, Grant SG: Synapse proteomes show scale-free network properties and roles in plasticity, cognition and mental illness. 2003, Nat Neurosci (submitted).
35. Sanes J.R., Lichtman J.W. Can molecules explain long-term potentiation? Nat. Neurosci. 2:1999;597-604.
36. Aebersold R., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 422:2003;198-207.
37. De Boer E., Rodriguez P., Bonte E., Krijgsveld J., Katsantoni E., Heck A., Grosveld F., Strouboulis J. Efficient biotinylation and single-step purification of tagged transcription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:2003;7480-7485.
38. van Bergen A., Papanikolaou T., Schuker A., Moller A., Schlosshauer B. Long-term stimulation of mouse hippocampal slice culture on microelectrode array. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 11:2003;123-133.
39. Nolan P.M., Peters J., Strivens M., Rogers D., Hagan J., Spurr N., Gray I.C., Vizor L., Brooker D., Whitehill E., et al. A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 25:2000;440-443.
40. Rogers D.C., Peters J., Martin J.E., Ball S., Nicholson S.J., Witherden A.S., Hafezparast M., Latcham J., Robinson T.L., Quilter C.A., et al. SHIRPA, a protocol for behavioral assessment: validation for longitudinal study of neurological dysfunction in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 306:2001;89-92.
41. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature. 420:2002;206-210.
42. Husi H, Theodosiou T, Cumiskey M, Armstrong JD, Grant SGN: Protein-Protein Interaction Database. URL: http://www.PPID.org.
43. Husi H, Grant SG: Construction of a protein-protein interaction database (PPID) for synaptic biology. In Neuroscience Databases: a Practical Guide. Edited by Kotter R. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:51-62.
44. Grant SGN: Genes to Cognition. URL: http://www.genes2cognition.org.
45. Grant SGN: An integrative neuroscience program linking mouse genes to cognition and disease. In Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era. Edited by Robert Plomin JCD, Craig IW, McGuffin P. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2002:123-138.