Adaptable Behaviours for Successful Work and Career Adjustment

Australian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 65-73

  Griffin, Barbara ^a   Hesketh, Beryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242491701     PISSN: 00049530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049530412331312914     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allworth, E. (1997, Jume). Cognitive ability, biodata and personality: Incremental and differential validity in a training context. Paper presented at the second Australia Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Melbourne.
2. Allworth, E. (1998). Predicting the capacity to copy with changes in task requirements in job and training contexts. Unpublished data, Macquarie University, Sydney.
3. Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1997). Construct based biodata and the prediction of adaptive performance. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, Chicago.
4. Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
5. Ashford, S.J., & Cummings, L.L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67-79.
6. Ashford, S.J., & Taylor, M.S. (1990). Adaptation to work transitions: An integrative approach. In G.R. Ferris & K.M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 8., pp. 1-39). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
8. Barrick, M.R., Mitchell, T.R., & Stewart, G.L. (2002, June). Situational and motivational influences on trait-behavior relationships. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.
9. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Campbell, J.P. (1999). The definition and measurement of performance in the new age. In D.R. Ilgen & E.D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 399-427). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
11. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organisations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
12. Chan, D. (2000a). Conceptual and empirical gaps in research on individual adaptation at work. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 143-164) London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
13. Chan, D. (2000b). Understanding adaptation to changes in the work environment: Integrating individual difference and learning perspectives. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 1-42.
14. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 190-210.
15. Clark. J.M. (1996). Contributions of inhibitory mechanisms to unified psychological theory in neuroscience and psychology. Brain and Cognition, 30, 127-152.
16. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
17. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21-50.
18. Crant, J.M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
19. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590
20. Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1976). Personality style and the process of work adjustment. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 23(1), 55-59.
22. Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97-124.
23. Feltovich, P.J., Spiro, R.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterised by complexity and change. In P.J. Feltovich & K.M. Ford (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 125-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Ford, J.K., Quinones, M.A., Sego, D.J., & Sorra, J. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45, 511-527.
25. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-64.
26. George, J., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524.
27. Goldberg, L.R. (2000). International Personality Item Pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. Retrieved 15 May, 2001, from http://ipip. ori.org/ipip/.
28. Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2001). Selection for a changing workplace. Paper presented at the 4th Australian Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Sydney
29. Hesketh, B., & Considine, G. (1998). Integrating individual and organizational perspectives for career development and change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 405-481.
30. Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (pp. 21-51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
31. Judge, T.A., Thoresen, C.J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T.M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 107-122.
32. Kohn, M.L., & Schooler, C. (1978). The reciprocal effects of the substantive complexity of work and intellectual flexibility: A longitudinal assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 24-52.
33. Kohn, M.L., & Schooler, C. (1982). Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1257-1286.
34. Kozlowski, S.W. J., Gully, S.M., Brown, K.G., Salas, E., Smith, E.M., & Nason, E.R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 1-31.
35. Lawler, E.E. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3-15.
36. Lofquist, L., & Dawis, R.V. (1969), Adjustment to work. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
37. Luchins, A.S., & Luchins, E.H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior. Oregon: University of Oregon Books.
38. Martin, M.M., & Rubin, R.B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626.
39. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan & R. Johnson & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). California: Academic Press, Inc.
40. Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C., & Schmit, M.J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.
41. Murphy, K.R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2, 183-200.
42. Owens, W.A., & Schoenfeldt, L.F. (1979). Toward a classification of persons. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 569-607.
43. Parker, S.K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835-852.
44. Parker, S.K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 447-469.
45. Parker, S.K., Axtell, C.M., & Turner, N. (2001). Designing a safer workplace: Importance of job autonomy, communication quality, and supportive supervisors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(3), 211-228.
46. Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A., & Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.
47. Pulakos, E.D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D.W., Arad, S., Hedge, J.W., & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-323.
48. Reder, L.M., & Schunn, C.D. (1999). Bringing together the psychometric and strategy worlds: Predicting adaptivity in a dynamic task. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 315-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Rende, B. (2000). Cognitive flexibility: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 21(2), 121-133.
50. Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Schunn, C.D., Lovett, M.C., & Reder, L.M. (2001). Awareness and working memory in strategy adaptivity. Memory and Cognition, 29(2), 254-266.
52. Schunn, C.D., & Reder, L.M. (2001). Another source of individual differences: Strategy adaptivity to changing rates of success. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
53. Smith, E.M., Ford, J.K., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategy. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace (pp. 89-118). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
54. Stankov, L. (1988). Aging, attention, and intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 3(1), 59-74.
55. Wanberg, C.R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J.D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 373-385.