Endressianthus, a new normapolles-producing plant genus of Fagalean affinity from the late cretaceous of Portugal

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 164, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Friis, Else Marie ^b   Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard ^b   Schönenberger, Jürg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Betulaceae; Campanian; Endressianthus foveocarpus; Endressianthus miraensis; Fagales; Floral morphology; Fossil flowers; Late Cretaceous; Normapolles; Portugal

Indexed keywords

CRETACEOUS; FLORAL TRAIT; NEW GENUS; PALEOBOTANY; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY;

BEIRA LITORAL; PORTUGAL;

BETULACEAE; DORCATRAGUS MEGALOTIS; ENDRESSIANTHUS; ENDRESSIANTHUS FOVEOCARPUS; ENDRESSIANTHUS MIRAENSIS; FAGALES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NORMAPOLLES;

EID: 0242490840     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/376875     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Abbe EC 1974 Flowers and inflorescences of the "Amentiferae." Bot Rev 40:159-261.
2. Alvin KL 1977 The conifers Frenelopsis and Manica in the Cretaceous of Portugal. Palaeontology 20:387-404.
3. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) 1998 An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:531-553.
4. Barbosa BP 1981 Carta geológica de Portugal na escala de 1/50000: noticia explicativa da folha 16-C Vagos. Serviços Geológicos de Portugal, Lisbon.
5. Batten DJ 1981 Stratigraphy, palaeogeography and evolutionary significance of Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary Normapolles pollen. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 35:125-137.
6. _ 1986a The Cretaceous Normapolles pollen genus Vancampopollenites: occurrence, form, and function. Palaeontology 35:21-39.
7. _ 1986b Possible functional implications of exine sculpture and architecture in some Late Cretaceous Normapolles pollen. Pages 219-232 in S Blackmore, IK Ferguson, eds. Pollen and spores: form and function. Academic Press, London.
8. Batten DJ, RA Christopher 1981 Key to recognition of Normapolles and some morphologically similar genera. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 35:359-383.
9. Beauvais M, P-Y Berthou, J Lauverjat 1975 Le gisement Campanien de Mira (Beira Litorale, Portugal): sédimentologie, micropaléontologie, révision des Madréporaires. Comun Dos Serv Geol Port 59: 37-58.
10. Chen Z-D, SR Manchester, H-Y Sun 1999 Phylogeny and evolution of the Betulaceae as inferred from DNA sequences, morphology, and paleobotany. Am J Bot 86:1168-1181.
11. Crane PR 1989 Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of non-magnoliid dicotyledons. Plant Syst Evol 162:165-191.
12. Cronquist A 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Endress PK 1967 Systematische Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot Jahrb 87:431-525.
14. _ 1977 Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales group. Plant Syst Evol Suppl 1:321-347.
15. Eriksson O, EM Friis, P Löfgren 2000 Seed size, fruit size and dispersal spectra in angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous to the Late Tertiary. Am Nat 156:47-58.
16. Feuer S 1991 Pollen morphology and the systematic relationships of Ticodendron incognitum. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:143-151.
17. Friis EM 1983 Upper Cretaceous (Senonian) floral structures of juglandalean affinity containing Normapolles pollen. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 39:161-188.
18. Friis EM, PR Crane 1989 Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Hamamelidae. Pages 155-174 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol 1. "Lower" Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
19. Friis EM, KR Pedersen 2000 Die fossilen Blüten von Åsen in Schonen, Süd-Sweden. Pages 151-154 in D Meischner, ed. Europäische Fossillagerstätten. Springer, Heidelberg.
20. Friis EM, KR Pedersen, PR Crane 1992 Esgueiria gen. nov., fossil flowers with combretaceous features from the Late Cretaceous of Portugal. Biol Skr Dan Vid Selsk 41:1-45.
21. _ 2001 Origin and radiation of angiosperms. Pages 97-102 in DEG Briggs, PR Crowther, eds. Palaeobiology. II. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
22. Gale AS 2000 The Cretaceous world. Pages 4-19 in SJ Culver, PR Rawson, eds. Biotic response to global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Góczán F, JJ Groot, W Krutzsch, B Pacltová 1967 Die Gattungen des "Stemma Normapolles Pflug 1953b" (Angiospermae): Neubeschreibungen und Revision europäischer Formen (Oberkreide bis Eozän). Paläontol Abhandlungen B 2:427-633.
24. Gómez-Laurito J, LD Gómez 1991 Ticodendraceae: a new family of flowering plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:87-88.
25. Hammel B, WG Burger 1991 Neither oak nor alder: the history of Ticodendraceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:89-95.
26. Handel-Mazzetti H 1932 Rhoipteleaceae, eine neue Familie der Monochlamydeen. Feddes Repert 30:75-80.
27. Herngreen GFW, M Kedves, LV Rovnina, SB Smirnova 1996 Cretaceous palynofloral provinces: a review. Pages 1157-1188 in J Jansonius, DC McGregor, eds. Palynology: principles and applications. Vol 3. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Salt Lake City.
28. Hjelmquist H 1948 Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Bot Not Suppl 2:1-171.
29. Hufford LD, PK Endress 1989 The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns among Hamamelididae. Bot J Linn Soc 99:301-346.
30. Igersheim A 1993 The character states of the Caribbean monotypic endemic Strumpfia (Rubiaceae). Nord J Bot 13:545-559.
31. Igersheim A, O Cichocki 1996 A simple method for microtome sectioning of prehistoric charcoal specimens, embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Rev Palaeobot Palynol 92:389-393.
32. Johnson LAS, KL Wilson 1993 Casuarinaceae. Pages 237-242 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
33. Kedves M, F Diniz 1983 Les Normapolles du Crétacé supérieur en Europe: implications Paléobiogéographiques. Geobios 16:329-345.
34. Kedves M, M Hegedüs 1975 Pollen grains of the Interporopollenites fgen. from sediments of the Upper Cretaceous period in Portugal. Acta Biol Szeged 21:43-62.
35. Knobloch E, DH Mai 1986 Monographie der Früchte und Samen in der Kreide von Mitteleuropa. Rozpr Ustr Ust Geol Praha 47:1-219.
36. Krutzsch W 1961 Beitrag zur Sporenpaläontologie der präoberoligozänen kontinentalen und marinen Tertiärablagerungen Brandenburgs. Ber Geol Ges DDR 5:290-343.
37. Kubitzki K 1993a Betulaceae. Pages 151-157 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
38. _ 1993b Fagaceae. Pages 301-309 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
39. _ 1993c Myricaceae. Pages 453-457 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
40. _ 1993d Ticodendraceae. Pages 594-596 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
41. Lauverjat J, D Pons 1978 Le gisement sénonien d'Esgueira (Portugal): stratigraphie et flore fossile. Pages 119-137 in CR 103e Congr Nat Soc Sav. Vol Sci. II. Nancy.
42. MacDonald AD 1977 Myricaceae: floral hypothesis for Gale and Comptonia. Can J Bot 55:2636-2651.
43. Magallón S, PR Crane, PS Herendeen 1999 Phylogenetic pattern, diversity and diversification of eudicots. Ann Mo Bot Gard 86:297-372.
44. Manos PS, KP Steele 1997 Phylogenetic analysis of "higher" Hamamelididae based onplastid sequence data. Am J Bot 84:1407-1419.
45. Médus J 1981 Pollens Normapolles de coupes stratotypiques du Crétacé supérieur des Charentes et du Sénonien du Portugal. Comun Dos Serv Geol Port 67:19-28.
46. _ 1987a Interporopollenites Weyland et Krieger: un genre normapolle triporé operculé du Crétacé supérieur. Grana 26:67-73.
47. _ 1987b Paleogeographie et systematique du genre Pseduromeinipollenites au Crétacé superieur. Pages 321-326 in Actas de palinología: actas del VI simposio de Palinología, A.P.L.E.
48. Muller J 1970 Palynological evidence on early differentiation of angiosperms. Biol Rev 45:417-450.
49. Pflug HD 1953 Zur Entstehung und Entwicklung des angiospermiden Pollen in der Erdgeschichte. Palaeontogr B 95:60-171.
50. Pons D, J Lauverjat, J Broutin 1980 Paléoclimatologie comparée de deux gisements du Crétacé supérieur d'Europe occidentale. Mém Soc Géol Fr NS 139:151-158.
51. Rozefelds AC 1998 Stamen morphology in Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae). Int J Plant Sci 159:655-667.
52. Schönenberger J, KR Pedersen, EM Friis 2001 Normapolles flowers of Fagalean affinity from the Late Cretaceous of Portugal. Plant Syst Evol 226:205-230.
53. Sims HJ, PS Herendeen, R Lupia, RA Christopher, PR Crane 1999 Fossil flowers with Normapolles pollen from the Late Cretaceous of southeastern North Am Rev Palaeobot Palynol 106:131-151.
54. Stone DE 1973 Patterns in the evolution of amentiferous fruits. Brittonia 25:371-384.
55. _ 1989 Biology and evolution of temperate and tropical Juglandaceae. Pages 117-145 in PR Crane, S Blackmore, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Clarendon, Oxford.
56. _ 1993 Juglandaceae. Pages 348-359 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
57. Stone DE, CR Broome 1971 Pollen ultrastructure: evidence for relationship of the Juglandaceae and the Rhoipteleaceae. Pollen Spores 13:5-14.
58. _ 1975 Juglandaceae A Rich. ex kunth. World Pollen Spore Flora 4:1-35.
59. Takeoka M, E Stix 1963 On the fine structure of pollen walls in some Scandinavian Betulaceae. Grana Palynol 4:161-188.
60. Teixeira C, G Zbyszewski 1976 Carta Geológica de Portugal na escala de 1/50000: notícia Explicativa da Folha 16-A. Aveiro. Serviçes Geológicos de Portugal, Lisbon.
61. Tiffney BH 1984 Seed size, dispersal syndromes, and the rise of the angiosperms: evidence and hypothesis. Ann Mo Bot Gard 71:551-576.
62. Tobe H 1991 Reproductive morphology, anatomy, and relationships of Ticodendron. Ann Mo Bot Gard 78:135-142.
63. Weberling F 1992 Morphology of flowers and inflorescence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
64. Weyland H, W Krieger 1953 Die Sporen und Pollen der Aachener Kreide und ihre Bedeutung für die Charakterisierung des mittleren Senons. Palaeontogr B 94:6-29.
65. Wu C-Y, K Kubitzki 1993 Rhoipteleaceae. Pages 584-585 in K Kubitzki, JG Rohwer, V Bittrich, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants. II. Flowering plants: dicotyledons. Magnoliid, hamamelid and caryophyllid families. Springer, Berlin.
66. Zaklinskaya ED 1981 Phylogeny and classification of the Normapolles. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 35:139-147.
67. Zavada MS, DL Dilcher 1986 Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 73:348-381.