Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 225, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 285-292

  Fishman, Michael A ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

ESS; Evolutionary stability; Forgiveness by default; Imperfect individuals; Indirect reciprocity; Involuntary defection

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; RECIPROCITY;

ALTRUISM; ANIMAL; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODEL; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0242329760     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00246-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alexander R.D. Darwinism and Human Affairs. 1979;University of Washington Press, Seattle.
2. Alexander R.D. The Biology of Moral Systems. 1987;Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
3. Axelrod R., Hamilton W.D. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 242:1981;1390-1396.
4. Darwin C. The Decent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. 1871;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. (reprinted 1981).
5. Fisher E.A. The relationship between mating systems and simultaneous Hermaphroditism in the coral reef fish Hypoplectrus nigricans. Anim. Behav. 28:1980;620-633.
6. Fishman M.A., Lotem A., Stone L. Heterogeneity stabilizes reciprocal altruism interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 209:2001;87-95.
7. Hofbauer J., Sigmund K. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. 1998;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. 3rd Edition:1993;Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. (Chapter 11).
9. Leimar O., Hammerstein P. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 268:2001;745-753.
10. Lotem A., Fishman M.A., Stone L. Poor phenotypes stabilize indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature. 400:1999;226-227.
11. Lotem A., Fishman M.A., Stone L. Evolution of unconditional altruism through signaling benefits. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 270:2002;199-205.
12. Milinski M., Semmann D., Bakker T.C.M., Krambeck H.J. Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 268:2001;2495-2501.
13. Milinski M., Semmann D., Krambeck H.J. Reputation helps solve the 'tragedy of the commons'. Nature. 415:2002;424-426.
14. Milinski M., Semmann D., Krambeck H.J. Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 269:2002;881-883.
15. Nowak M., Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature. 282:1998;462-466.
16. Nowak M., Sigmund K. The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 194:1998;561-574.
17. Selten R., Hammerstein P. Gaps in Harley's argument on evolutionary stable learning rules and in the logic of TfT. Behav. Brain. Sci. 7:1984;115-116.
18. Seyfarth R.M., Cheney D.I. Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature. 308:1984;541-543.
19. Sherratt T.N., Roberts G. The importance of phenotypic defectors in stabilizing reciprocal altruism. Behav. Ecol. 12:2001;313-317.
20. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46:1971;35-56.
21. Wedekind C., Milinski M. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science. 288:2000;850-852.
22. Wedekind C., Braithwaite V.A. The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1012-1015.
23. Wilkinson G.S. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature. 308:1984;181-184.
24. Williams G.C. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. 1966;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.