Real-Time Multicolor DNA Detection with Chemoresponsive Diffraction Gratings and Nanoparticle Probes

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 44, 2003, Pages 13541-13547

  Bailey, Ryan C ^a   Nam, Jwa Min ^a   Mirkin, Chad A ^a   Hupp, Joseph T ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PROBES;

DNA;

NANOPARTICLE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; DIFFRACTION; DNA DETERMINATION; ELECTRONICS; LASER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WAVEFORM;

ANTIGENS, BACTERIAL; BACTERIAL TOXINS; DNA; DNA PROBES; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; LASERS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;

EID: 0242267568     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja035479k     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mucic, R. C.; Storhoff, J. J. Nature 1996, 382, 607-609.
2. Elghanian, R.; Storhoff, J. J.; Mucic, R. C.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1997, 277, 1078-1080.
3. Storhoff, J. J.; Elghanian, R.; Mucic, R. C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1959-1964.
4. Taton, T. A.; Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L. Science 2000, 289, 1757-1760.
5. Park, S.-J.; Taton, T. A.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2002, 295, 1503-1506.
6. Nam, J.-M.; Park, S.-J.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3820-3821.
7. Jin, R.; Wu, G.; Li, Z.; Mirkin, C. A.; Schatz, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1643-1654.
8. Representative of reports on other refractive index based signal-transduction schemes are the following: (a) Thiel, A. J.; Frutos, A. G.; Jordan, C. E.; Corn, R. M.; Smith, L. M. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4948-4956.
9. (b) Dancil, K.-P. S.; Greiner, D. P.; Sailor, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7925-7930.
10. (c) Chan, S.; Horner, S. R.; Miller, B. L.; Fauchet, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11797-11798.
11. (d) Riboh, J. C.; Haes, A. J.; McFarland, A. D.; Ranjit, C.; Van Duyne, R. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1772-1780.
12. Bailey, R. C.; Hupp, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6767-6774.
13. Bailey, R. C.; Hupp, J. T. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2392-2398.
14. Mines, G. A.; Tzeng, B.; Stevenson, K. J.; Li, J.; Hupp, J. T. Angew. Chem. 2002, 41, 154-157.
15. Massari, A. M.; Stevenson, K. J.; Hupp, J. T. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 500, 185-191.
16. Dang, X.; Stevenson, K. J.; Hupp, J. T. Langmuir 2001, 17, 3109-3112.
17. Eckstein, F. Oligonucleotides and analogues; Oxford University Press: New York, 1991.
18. Caution! Pirahna solutions are extraordinarily dangerous, reacting explosively with trace quantities of organics.
19. In contrast to SPR measurements, small differences in angle of incidence are of little consequence for grating efficiency measurements.
20. Though it is clear from Figure 3a that the observed signal is highly nonlinear over the full dynamic range of the sensor, for reasons detailed in the Discussion section, the response should be linear for extrapolation in the low concentration range.
21. HIV-1 isolate 97ZM057F from Zambia nonfunctional envelope glycoprotein (env) gene (AF405180, b., N166-198th). Detailed information is available on the National Center fro Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website: http://www2.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html.
22. According to eq 3, assuming constant grating thickness.
23. [α = 2,3·OD(λ)/t] and [ω = 2πc/λ], where c is the speed of light, λ is the wavelength of light, OD(λ) is the optical density of the grating, and t is the grating thickness.
24. Mere proximity of the bound particles to the gold platform, however, should also alter the particles' plasmon absorption to a small extent. For simplicity, and because we lack quantitative information about the anticipated alteration, we neglect this effect in the discussion that follows.
25. Bailey, R. C.; Stevenson, K. J.; Hupp, J. T. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1930-1934.
26. Kelly, K. L.; Coronado, E.; Zhao, L. L.; Schatz, G. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 668-677.
27. Experimental extinction spectra for surface and solution aggregates of gold nanoparticles generally feature significant scattering components in addition light absorption. Equation 3, on the other hand, employs only the absorption component.
28. (632nm) = 0.1797.
29. The index contrast of the grating, prior to hybridization, also contains a contribution from the attached ssDNA; however, the contribution is small in an effective medium context (see ref 9), so is neglected in calculations here.
30. Recall that DE is defined here as a ratio of diffracted-to-undiffracted light intensities; both are attenuated by solution absorption but to precisely proportional extents.
31. Taton, T. A.; Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L. Science 2000, 289, 1757-1760.
32. Cao, Y. W. C.; Jin, R.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2002, 297, 3820-3821.
33. Lyon, L. A.; Musick, M. D.; Natan, M. J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5177-5183.
34. He, L.; Musick, M. D.; Nicewamer, S. R.; Salinas, F. G.; Benkovic, S. J. ; Natan, M. J.; Keating, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9071-9077.
35. Recently a two-wavelength SPR experiment has been reported, though not utilizing probe label absorptions for signal magnitude enhancement purposes: Zacher, T.; Wischerhoff, E. Langmuir 2002, 18, 1748-1759.