Toxicological evaluation of dry ice expanded tobacco

Toxicology Letters

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 107-119

  Theophilus, Eugenia H ^a   Poindexter, Dale B ^a   Meckley, Daniel R ^a   Bombick, Betsy R ^a   Borgerding, Michael F ^a   Higuchi, Mark A ^a   Ayres, Paul H ^a   Morton, Michael J ^a   Mosberg, Arnold T ^a   Swauger, James E ^a  

^a R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Cigarette; Expanded tobacco; In vitro; In vivo; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE;

AMES TEST; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ACTIVITY; FEMALE; GENOTOXICITY; HEATING; INHALATION; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; SKIN TUMOR; TECHNOLOGY; TOBACCO; TOXICITY;

NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 0142227669     PISSN: 03784274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4274(03)00235-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Avalos J.T., Lawlor T.E., Fowler K.W., Bombick B.R., Doolittle D.J. A comparison of the effectiveness of Salmonella strains for detecting mutagenicity of a cigarette smoke condensate. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 37:(Supplement 32):2001;19.
2. Ayres P.H., Hayes J.R., Higuchi M.A., Mosberg A.T., Sagartz J.W. Subchronic inhalation by rats of mainstream smoke from a cigarette that primarily heats tobacco compared with a cigarette that burns tobacco. Inhal. Toxicol. 13:2001;149-186.
3. Bernstein L., Kaldor J., McCann J., Pike M.C. An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. Mutat. Res. 97:1982;267-281.
4. Bombick D.W., Bombick B.R., Ayres P.H., Putnam K., Avalos J., Borgerding M.F., Doolittle D.J. Evaluation of the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of mainstream whole smoke and smoke condensate from a cigarette containing a novel carbon filter. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 39:1997;11-17.
5. Borgerding M.F., Bodnar J.A., Chung H.L., Mangan P.P., Morrison C.C., Risner C.H., Rodgers J.C., Simmons D.F., Uhrig M.S., Wendelboe F.N., Wingate D.E., Winkler L.S. Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 1. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke. Food Chem. Toxicol. 36:1997;169-182.
6. Borgerding M.F., Perfetti T.A., Ralapati S. Determination of nicotine in tobacco, tobacco processing environments and tobacco products. Gorrod J.W., Jacob P.I.I.I. Analytical Determination of Nicotine and Related Compounds and Their Metabolites. 1999;285-391 Elsvier, New York.
7. Borgerding, M.F., Bodnar, J.A., Wingate, D.E., 2000. The Massachusetts Benchmark Study. Final Report 24 July 2000. A Research Study Conducted by Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company after consultation with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
8. Boxman A.R. Unveiling the secrets of primary processing. Tobacco Int. 194:1992;16-19.
9. Browne C.L. The Design of Cigarettes. 1990;50-51 Hoechst Celanase Corporation, Charlotte, NC.
10. Chepiga T.A., Morton M.J., Murphy P.A., Avalos J.T., Bombick B.R., Doolittle D.J., Borgerding M.F., Swauger J.E. A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F). Food Chem. Toxicol. 38:2000;949-962.
11. CORESTA, 1969. Machine smoking of cigarettes and determination of crude and dry smoke condensates. Standard method 10, CORESTA Information Bulletin, pp. 24-33.
12. Davis D.L., Nielsen M.T. Tobacco Production, Chemistry and Technology. 1999;379-380 Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.
13. deBethizy, J.D., Bombick, B.R., Bombick, D.W., Swauger, J.E., Doolittle, D.J., 1998. The use of short-term tests to evaluate progress toward reducing the toxicity of cigarette smoke. Report of Canada's Expert Committee on Cigarette Toxicity Reduction, 21-22 September.
14. FR, 1967. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarettes. Testing for tar and nicotine. Federal Register, 32, 147, p. 11178.
15. Gaworski C.L., Heck J.D., Bennett M.B., Wenk M.L. Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: skin painting bioassay of cigarette smoke condensate in SENCAR mice. Toxicology. 139:1999;1-17.
16. ILAR, 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
17. ISO, 2000. Cigarettes-routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions, ISO 3308, International Organization for Standardization.
18. Maron D.M., Ames B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Kilbey B.J., Legator M., Nichols W., Ramel C. Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures. 1984;93-140 Elsevier.
19. McKee R.H., Nicolich M.J., Scala R.A., Lewis S.C. Estimation of epidermal carcinogenic potency. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15:1990;320-328.
20. Montreal Protocol, 1987. Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, Montreal, 16 September 1987. http://sedac.ciesin.org/pidb/texts/montreal. protocol.ozone.1987.html .
21. NCI, 1976, 1977, 1980. National Cancer Institute. Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes, Report Numbers 1-4. Smoking and Health Program, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, Washington, DC, USA.
22. NCI, 1980. National Cancer Institute. Report No. 5. Toward Less Hazardous Cigarettes. Summary: Four Skin Paining Bioassays Using Condensate From Experimental Cigarettes. Smoking and Health Program, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, Washington, DC, USA.
23. Norman, A., Jones, E.C., 1998. The history of cigarette design. In: Recent Advances in Tobacco Science-Responding to Changes in Our Industry, Tobacco Science Research Conference, Atlanta, GA, 13-16 September, pp. 24, 4.
24. Perry P., Wolff S. New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature. 251:1974;156-158.
25. Pillsbury H.C., Bright C.C., O'Connor K.J., Irish F.W. Tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke. J. AOAC. 52:1969;458-462.
26. RJRT, 1988. Chemical and Biological Studies. New Cigarette Prototypes that Heat Instead of Burn Tobacco, Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 88-92564, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC.
27. Siegel S. Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 1956;McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
28. Steele R.H., Payne V.M., Fulp C.W., Rees D.C., Lee C.K., Doolittle D.J. A comparison of the mutagenicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensates from a representative sample of the US cigarette market with a Kentucky reference cigarette (K1R4F). Mutat. Res. 342:1995;179-190.
29. Swauger J.E., Steichen T.J., Murphy P.A., Kinsler S. An analysis of the mainstream smoke chemistry of samples of the US cigarette market acquired between 1995 and 2000. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35:2002;142-156.
30. Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives Used in Food. 1982;Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Foods, Washington, DC.
31. Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives Used in Food, Redbook II. 1993;Food and Drug Administration. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC.
32. Yahagi T., Degawa M., Seino Y., Matsushima T., Nagao M., Sugimura T., Hashimoto Y. Mutagenicity of carcinogenic azo dyes and their derivatives. Cancer Lett. 1:1975;91-96.