Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe's core value

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 49-73

  Leslie, David W ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036381933     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777130     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 241-281.
2. Altbach, P. G. (1997) Problems and possibilities: The U. S. academic profession. In P. G. Altbach & M. J. Finkelstein (Eds.), The academic profession: The professoriate in crisis. (pp. 3-20) New York: Garland Publishing.
3. American Association of University Professors (1940). 1940 Statement of principles on Academic freedom and tenure with 1970 interpretive comments. http://higher-ed.org/resources/AAUP_1940stat.htm
4. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of AppIied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
5. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bowen, W. G., & Sosa, J. A. (1989). Prospects for faculty in the arts and sciences: A study of factors affecting demand and supply, 1987 to 2012. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Braxton, J. M. (1989). Institutional variability in faculty conformity to the norms of science: A force of integration or fragmentation in the academic profession. Research in Higher Education, 30, 419-433.
8. Braxton, J. M. (1990). Deviancy from the norms of science: A test of control theory. Research in Higher Education, 31, 461-476.
9. Clark, B. R. (1980). Academic culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Institute for Social and Policy Studies.
10. Clark, B. R. (Ed.). (1987). The academic profession: National, disciplinary, & institutional settings. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Clark, B. R. (1989). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Educational Researcher, 18(5) 4-8.
12. College Art Association. (1996). Standards for retention and tenure of art historians. Adopted by CAA Board of Directors, February 21, 1996.
13. Davis, G. (1997). Mathematicians and the market. Notices of the AMS, 44, 1307-1315.
14. Diamond, R., & Adams, B. E. (Eds.) (1995). The disciplines speak: Rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
15. Emmert, P., & Rollman, S. A. (1997). A national survey of tenure and promotion standards in communication departments. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration. (1), 10-23.
16. Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Finkelstein, M. J. (1997). The emergence of the modern academic role. In P. G. Altbach & M. J. Finkelstein (Eds.), The academic profession: The professoriate in crisis (pp. 21-47). New York: Garland Publishing.
18. Finnegan, D. E. (1993). Segmentation in the academic labor market: Hiring cohorts in comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 621-56.
19. Fulton, O., & Trow, M. (1974). Research activity in American education. SocioIogy of Education, 47, 29-73.
20. Gilbert, S. M. (1997). Final report: MLA Committee on Professional Employment. Washington, DC: Modern Language Association. http://www.mla.org
21. Gouldner, A. (1958). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles, I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 281-306.
22. Gouldner, A. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles, II. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 444-480.
23. Hilton, J. (1935). Goodbye Mr. Chips. New York: Bantam Books
24. Illinois Wesleyan College. (2000). lllinois Wesleyan Faculty Handbook (Chapter IV). http://www.iwu.edu/melloncenter/fhndbook/fh/chapter4/ten_criteria .html
25. Kirshstein, R. J., Matheson, N., Jing, Z., & Zimbler, L. J. (1997). Instructional faculty and staff in higher education institutions: Fall 1987 and Fali 1992. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
26. Leslie, D. W. (1998). Redefining tenure: Tradition versus the new political economy of higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 652-679.
27. Leslie, D. W. (2000, May). One faculty or many? Differentiation within the American academic profession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.
28. Light, D., Jr. (1974a). Introduction: The structure of the academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47(1), 2-28.
29. Light, D., Jr. (1974b). Thinking about faculty. Daedalus, 103(4), 258-264.
30. Riesman, D. (1958). Constraint and variety in American education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31. Russell, A. B. (2000). State perspectives on higher education faculty issues. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers. http://www.sheeo.org/network/Faculty-Issues-Report.pdf
32. Shettle, C. F. (1997). S & E Ph.D. unemployment trends: Cause for alarm? Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/issuebrf/sib97318.htm
33. Skal, D. J. (1998). Screams of reason: Mad science and modern culture. New York: W. W. Norton.
34. Syverson, P. D. (1997). It's not just employment/unemployment anymore - Realities of Ph.D. labor market lead to more complex measures of postgraduation employment. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools. http://www.cgsnet.org/vcr/cctr704.htm
35. University of Illinois. (2000). Promotion and tenure criteria and guidelines. http://www.provost.uiuc.edu/provost/comm9/criteria.html#criteria
36. Youn, T. I. K., & Zelterman, D. (1988). Instiutional career mobility in academia. In D. Breneman & T. I. K. Youn (Eds.), Academic labor markets and careers. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.