Additional Signalling Compounds are Required to Orchestrate Plant Development

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-24

  Beveridge, Christine A ^a   Gresshoff, Peter M ^a   Rameau, Catherine ^b   Turnbull, Colin G N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Branching; Flowering; Long distance signalling; Master regulators; Networks; Nodulation; Novel signals; Phytohormones

Indexed keywords

HORMONES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PLANT CELL CULTURE;

NODULATION;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

EID: 0141818076     PISSN: 07217595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-003-0036-5     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Araki T, Komeda Y. 1993. Flowering in darkness in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 4:801-811.
2. Aukerman MJ, Amasino RM. 1998. Floral induction and florigen. Cell 93:491-494.
3. Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P. 1993. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5:1147-1155.
4. Beveridge CA, Murfet IC. 1996. The gigas mutant in pea is deficient in the floral stimulus. Physiol Plant 96:637-645.
5. Beveridge CA, Murfet IC, Kerhoas L, Sotta B, Miginiac E, Rameau C. 1997a. The shoot controls zeatin riboside export from pea roots. Evidence from the branching mutant rms4. Plant J 11:339-345.
6. Beveridge CA, Ross JJ, Murfet IC. 1992. Mutant dn influences dry matter distribution, assimilate partitioning and flowering in Lathyrus odoratus L. J Exp Bot 43:55-62.
7. Beveridge CA, Ross JJ, Murfet IC. 1996. Branching in pea. Action of genes Rms3 and Rms4. Plant Physiol 110:859-865.
8. Beveridge CA, Symons GM, Murfet IC, Ross JJ, Rameau C. 1997b. The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic acid levels and reduced root-sap zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal(s). Plant Physiol 115:1251-1258.
9. Beveridge CA, Symons GM, Turnbull CGN. 2000. Auxin inhibition of decapitation induced branching is dependent on graft-transmissible signals regulated by genes Rms1 and Rms2. Plant Physiol 123:689-697.
10. Beveridge CA, Weller JL, Singer SR, Hofer JMI. 2003. Axillary meristem development: budding relationships between networks controlling flowering, branching and photoperiod responsiveness. Plant Physiol (in press).
11. Beveridge CA. 2000. Long distance signalling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea. Plant Growth Regul 32:193-203.
12. Caba JM, Luz-Centeno M, Fernández B, Gresshoff PM, Ligero F. 2000. Inoculation and nitrate alter phytohormone levels in soybean roots: differences between a supernodulating mutant and the wild type. Planta 211:98-104.
13. Cancel JD, Larsen PB. 2002. Loss-of-function mutations in the ethylene receptor ETR1 cause enhanced sensitivity and exaggerated response to ethylene in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 129:1557-1567.
14. Carroll BJ, McNeil DL, Gresshoff PM. 1985. Isolation and properties of soybean mutants which nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4162-4166.
15. Cheng WH, Endo A, Zhou L, Penney J, Chen HC, Arroyo A, Leon E, Nambara E, Asami T, Seo M, Koshiba T, Sheen J. 2002. A unique short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase in Arabidopsis glucose signaling and abscisic acid biosynthesis and functions. Plant Cell 14:2723-2743.
16. Clark SE. 2001. Cell signalling at the shoot meristem. Nature Reviews. Mol Cell Biol 2:276-284.
17. Colasanti J, Sundaresan V. 2000. 'Florigen' enters the molecular age: long-distance signals that cause plants to flower. Trends Biochem Sci 25:236-240.
18. Colasanti J, Yuan Z, Sundaresan V. 1998. The indeterminate gene encodes a zinc finger protein and regulates a leaf-generated signal required for the transition to flowering in maize. Cell 93:593-603.
19. Curie C, Briat J-F. 2003. Iron transport and signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:07.1-07.24.
20. Delves AC, Mathews A, Day D, Carter AS, Carroll BJ, Gresshoff PM. 1986. Regulation of the soybean-Rhizobium symbiosis by shoot and root factors. Plant Physiol 82:588-590.
21. Delves AC, Higgins A, Gresshoff PM. 1992. The shoot apex is not the source of the systemic signal controlling nodule numbers in soybean. Plant Cell Environ 15:249-254.
22. Dénarìé J, Debellé F, Promé J-C. 1996. Rhizobium lipo-chitooligo-saccharide nodulation factors: signaling molecules mediating recognition and morphogenesis. Ann Rev Biochem 65:503-535.
23. Dodd IC. 2003. Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. J Plant Growth Regul 22:32-46.
24. Endre G, Kereszt A, Kevei Z, Mihacea S, Kalo P, Kiss GB. 2002. A receptor kinase regulating symbiotic nodule development. Nature 417:962-966.
25. Ferguson BJ, Mathesius U. 2003. Signaling interactions during nodule development. J Plant Growth Regul 22:47-72.
26. Fernie AR, Willmitzer L. 2001. Molecular and biochemical triggers of potato tuber development. Plant Physiol 127:1459-1465.
27. Fletcher JC. 2002. Shoot and floral meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:45-66.
28. Foo E, Turnbull CGN, Beveridge CA. 2001, Long-distance signalling and control of branching in the rms1 mutant of pea. Plant Physiol 126:203-209.
29. Gresshoff PM. 1993. Molecular genetic analysis of nodulation genes in soybean. Plant Breeding Rev 11:275-318.
30. Gresshoff PM. 2003. Post-genomic insights into plant nodulation symbioses. Genome Biol 4:201.
31. Harmer SL, Hogenesch JB, Straume M, Chang HS, Han B, Zhu T, Wang X, Kreps JA, Kay SA. 2000. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290:2110-2113.
32. Havelange A, Lejeune P, Bernier G. 2000. Sucrose/cytokinin interaction in Sinapis alba at floral induction: a shoot-to-root-to-shoot physiological loop. Physiol Plant 109:343-350.
33. Hoffmann-Benning S, Gage DA, McIntosh L, Kende H, Zeevaart JA. 2002. Comparison of peptides in the phloem sap of flowering and non-flowering Perilla and lupine plants using microbore HPLC followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Planta 216:140-147.
34. 1 and internode growth in Pisum sativum L. Planta 168:414-420.
35. Jackson SD. 1999. Multiple signaling pathways control tuber induction in potato. Plant Physiol 119:1-8.
36. Jiang Q, Gresshoff PM. 2002. Shoot-control and genetic mapping of the har1-1 (hypernodulation and aberrant root formation) mutant of Lotus japonicus. Funct Plant Biol. 29:1371-1376.
37. Jorgensen RA. 2002. RNA traffics information systemically in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11561-11563.
38. Kelly MO, Davies PJ. 1988. Photoperiodic and genetic control of carbon partitioning in peas and its relationship to apical senescence. Plant Physiol 86:978-982.
39. King RW, Evans LT. 2003. Gibberellins and flowering of grasses and cereals: prizing open the lid of the "florigen" black box. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:12.1-12.22.
40. King RW, Evans LT, Mander LN, Moritz T, Pharis RP, Twitchin B. 2003. Synthesis of gibberellin GA(6) and its role in flowering of Lolium temulentum. Phytochemistry 62:77-82.
41. King RW, Moritz T, Evans LT, Junttila O, Herlt AJ. 2001. Long-day induction of flowering in Lolium temulentum involves sequential increases in specific gibberellins at the shoot apex. Plant Physiol 127:624-632.
42. King WM, Murfet IC. 1985. Flowering in Pisum: a sixth locus, Dne. Ann Bot 56:835-846.
43. Kitano H. 2002. Computational systems biology. Nature 420:206-210.
44. Krusell L, Madsen LH, Sato S, Aubert G, Genua A, Szczyglowski G, Duc G, Kaneko T, Tabata S, de Bruijn F, Pajuelo E, Sandal N, Stougaard J. 2002. Shoot control of root development is mediated by a receptor-like kinase. Nature 420:422-426.
45. Lang A. 1977. Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a day-neutral plant in grafts with a short-day plant and a long-day plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:2412-2416.
46. Leyser HMO. 2001. Auxin. Curr Biol 11:R728.
47. Leyser O, Deng X-W. 2000. Cell signalling and gene regulation: new directions in plant signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:351-352.
48. Lindsey K, Casson S, Chilley P. 2002. Peptides: new signalling molecules in plants. Trends Plant Sci 7:78-83.
49. Liu J, Yu J, McIntosh L, Kende H, Zeevaart JA. 2001. Isolation of a CONSTANS ortholog from Pharbitis nil and its role in flowering. Plant Physiol 125:1821-1830.
50. Martinez-Garcia JF, Garcia-Martinez JL, Bou J, Prat S. 2002a. The interaction of gibberellins and photoperiod in the control of potato tuberization. J Plant Growth Regul 20:377-386.
51. Martinez-Garcia JF, Virgos-Soler A, Prat S. 2002b. Control of photoperiod-regulated tuberization in potato by the Arabidopsis flowering-time gene CONSTANS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 15211-15216.
52. Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y. 1996. Phytosulfokine, sulfated peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cells of Asparagus officinalis L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7623-7627.
53. Matsubayashi Y, Ogawa M, Morita A, Sakagami Y. 2002. An LRR receptor kinase involved in perception of a peptide plant hormone, phytosulfokine. Science 296:1470-1472.
54. Men AE, Laniya TS, Searle IR, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Gresshoff I, Jiang Q, Carroll BJ, Gresshoff PM. 2003. Fast neutron mutagenesis of soybean. Glycine soja L. produces a supernodulating mutant containing a large deletion in Linkage Group H. Genome Lett 1:1-9.
55. Michaels SD, Amasino RM. 1999. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a represser of flowering. Plant Cell 11:949-956.
56. Mlotshwa S, Voinnet O, Mette MF, Matzke M, Vaucheret H, Ding G, Pruss G, Vance VB. 2002. RNA silencing and the mobile silencing signal. Plant Cell 14(Supp):S289-301.
57. Morris SE, Turnbull CGN, Murfet IC, Beveridge CA. 2001. Mutational analysis of branching in pea, Pisum sativum L: evidence that Rms1 and Rms5 regulate the same novel signal. Plant Physiol 126:1205-1213.
58. Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G. 2002. Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell 14(Suppl):S111-S130.
59. Murfet IC. 1971. Flowering in Pisum. Reciprocal grafts between known genotypes. Aust J Biol Sci 24:1089-1101.
60. Murfet IC, Reid JB. 1993. Developmental mutants. In: Casey R, Davies DR, editors. Peas-genetics, molecular biology and biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, ISBN 0 85198 863 6, p 165-216.
61. Napoli CA. 1996. Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dad1-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol 111:27-37.
62. Nishimura R, Hayashi M, Wu G-J, Kouchi H, Imaizumi-Anraku Y, Murakami Y, Kawasaki S, Akao S, Ohmori M, Nagasawa M, Harada K, Kawaguchi M. 2002. HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development. Nature 420:426-429.
63. Nomura T, Nakayama M, Reid JB, Takeuchi Y, Yokota T. 1997. Blockage of brassinosteriod biosynthesis and sensitivity causes dwarfism in garden pea. Plant Physiol 113:31-37.
64. Oldroyd GED. 2001. Dissecting symbiosis: developments in nod factor perception. Ann Bot 87:709-718.
65. Pearce G, Strydom D, Johnson S, Ryan CA. 1991. A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science 253:895-898.
66. Reid JB, Murfet IC. 1975. Flowering in Pisum: the sites and possible mechanisms of the vernalisation responses. J Exp Bot 26:860-867.
67. Rolland F, Moore B, Sheen J. 2002. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants. Plant Cell 14(suppl):S185-S205.
68. Ross JJ, O'Neill DP, Rathbone DA. 2003. Auxin-gibberellin interactions in pea: integrating the old with the new. J Plant Growth Regul 22: DOI:10.1007/s00344-003-0021.
69. Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Luca WJ. 1999. Phloem long-distance transport of CmNACP mRNA: implications for supracellular regulation in plants. Development 126:4405-4419.
70. Ryan CA, Pearce G, Scheer J, Moura DS. 2002. Polypeptide hormones. Plant Cell Suppl:S251-S264.
71. Samach A, Gover A. 2001. Photoperiodism: the consistent use of CONSTANS. Curr Biol. 11(16):R651-4.
72. Schmülling T. 2002. New insights into the functions of cytokinins in plant development. J Plant Growth Reg 21:40-49.
73. Searle IR, Men AE, Laniya TS, Buzas DM, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Carroll BJ, Gresshoff PM. 2003. Long distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase. Science 299:109-112.
74. Stracke S, Kistner C, Yoshida S, Mulder I, Sato S, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Sandal N, Stougaard J, Szczyglowski K, Parniske M. 2002. A plant receptor-like kinase required for both bacterial and fungal symbiosis. Nature 417:959-962.
75. Suarez-Lopez P, Wheatley K, Robson F, Onouchi H, Valverde F, Coupland G. 2001. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 410:1116-1120.
76. Trewavas A. 2002a. Plant cell signal transduction: the emerging phenotype. Plant Cell 14(suppl):S3-S4.
77. Trewavas A. 2002b. Mindless mastery. Nature 415:841.
78. Trotochaud AE, Jeong S, Clark SE. 2000. CLAVATA3, a multimeric ligand of the CLAVATA1 receptor-kinase. Science 289:613-617.
79. Turnbull CGN, Booker JP, Leyser HMO. 2002. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J 32:255-262.
80. Vogler H, Kuhlemeier C. 2003. Simple hormones but complex signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:51-56.
81. Weller JL, Reid JB, Taylor SA, Murfet IC. 1997. The genetic control of flowering in pea. Trends Plant Sci 2:412-418.
82. Xonconostle-Cazares B, Xiang Y, Ruiz-Medrano R, Wang H-L, Yoo B-C, McFarland KC, Franceschi VR, Lucas WJ. 1999. Plant paralog to viral movement protein potentiates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science 283:94-98.
83. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T. 2000. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473-2484.