Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis

Plant Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 255-262

  Turnbull, Colin G N ^a   Booker, Jon P ^b   Leyser, H M Ottoline ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Grafting; Long distance signal; Max mutants; Shoot branching

Indexed keywords

GENES; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); SEED;

MICROGRAFTING;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; GLUCURONIDASE; HYPOCOTYL; MUTATION; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 0036774555     PISSN: 09607412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01419.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bangerth, F. (1994) Response of cytokinin concentration in the xylem exudate of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to decapitation and auxin treatment, and relationship to apical dominance. Planta, 194, 439-442.
2. Beveridge, C.A. (2000) Long-distance signalling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea. Plant Growth Regul. 32, 193-203.
3. Beveridge, C.A. and Murfet, I.C. (1996) The gigas mutant in pea is deficient in the floral stimulus. Physiol. Plantarum, 96, 637-645.
4. Beveridge, C.A., Ross, J.J. and Murfet, I.C. (1994) Branching mutant rms2 in Pisum sativum. Grafting studies and endogenous indole-3-acetic acid levels. Plant Physiol. 104, 953-959.
5. Beveridge, C.A., Ross, J.J. and Muffet, I.C. (1996) Branching in pea. Action of genes Rms3 and Rms4. Plant Physiol. 110, 859-865.
6. Beveridge, C.A., Murfet, I.C., Kerhoas, L., Sotta, B., Miginiac, E. and Rameau, C. (1997a) The shoot controls zeatin riboside export from pea roots. Evidence from the branching mutant Rms4. Plant J. 11, 339-345.
7. Beveridge, C.A., Symons, G.M., Murfet, I.C., Ross, J.J. and Rameau, C. (1997b) The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic acid levels and reduced zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal(s). Plant Physiol. 115, 1251-1258.
8. Booker, J.P., van de Sande, K. and Leyser, H.M.O. (1999) max3, an Arabidopsis mutant with a modified pattern of aerial branching. Biologia Plant. 42, S41.
9. Bradford, K.J. and Yang, S.F. (1980) Xylem transport of 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor, in water-logged tomato plants. Plant Physiol. 65, 322-326.
10. Chailakhyan, M.K. (1968) Internal factors of plant flowering. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 19, 1-36.
11. Cline, M.G. (1991) Apical dominance. Bot. Rev. 57, 318-358.
12. Davies, W.J. and Zhang, J. (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development in drying soil. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 55-76.
13. Foo, E., Turnbull, C.G.N. and Beveridge, C.A. (2001) Long-distance signalling and the control of branching in the rms1 mutant of pea. Plant Physiol. 126, 203-209.
14. Haughn, G.W., Schultz, E.A. and Martinez-Zapater, J.M. (1995) The regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana: Meristems, morphogenesis and mutants. Can. J. Bot. 73, 959-981.
15. Holbrook, N.M., Shashidhar, V.R., James, R.A. and Munns, R. (2002) Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: Response of grafted plants to soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1503-1514.
16. Jefferson, R.A., Kavanagh, T.A. and Bevan, M.W. (1987) GUS fusions - β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6, 3901-3907.
17. Kuć, J. (2001) Concepts and direction of induced systemic resistance in plants and its application. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107, 7-12.
18. Lang, A., Chailakhyan, M.Kh. and Frolova, L.A. (1977) Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a day-neutral plant in grafts with a short-day plant and a long-day plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74, 2412-2416.
19. Leyser, H.M.O., Pickett, F.B., Dharmasiri, S. and Estelle, M. (1996) Mutations in the AXR3 gene of Arabidopsis result in altered auxin response including ectopic expression from the SAUR-AC1 promoter. Plant J. 10, 403-413.
20. Lincoln, C., Britton, J.H. and Estelle, M. (1990) Growth and development of the axr1 mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2, 1071-1080.
21. Métraux, J.-P. (2001) Systemic acquired resistance and salicylic acid: Current state of knowledge. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107, 13-18.
22. Morris, S.E., Turnbull, C.G.N., Murfet, I.C. and Beveridge, C.A. (2001) Mutational analysis of branching in pea (Pisum sativum L.): Evidence that Rms1 and Rms5 regulate the same novel signal. Plant Physiol. 126, 1205-1213.
23. Murfet, I.C. (1971) Flowering in Pisum: Reciprocal grafts between known genotypes. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24, 1089-1101.
24. Napoli, C. (1996) The highly branched phenotype of the Petunia hybrida dad1-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol. 111, 27-37.
25. Napoli, C.A., Beveridge, C.A. and Snowden, K.C. (1999) Reevaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. 44, 127-169.
26. Napoli, C.A. and Ruehle, J. (1996) New mutations affecting meristem growth and potential in Petunia hybrida. J. Heredity, 87, 371-377.
27. Raghothama, K.G. (1999) Phosphate acquisition. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 665-693.
28. Rhee, S.Y. and Somerville, C.R. (1995) Flat-surface grafting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13, 118-123.
29. Schurr, U., Gollan, T. and Schulze, E.D. (1992) Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap cornposition of Helianthus annuus. 2. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the xylem sap. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 561-567.
30. Stirnberg, P., van de Sande, K. and Leyser, H.M.O. (2002) MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development, 129, 1131-1141.
31. Talbert, P.B., Adler, H.T., Parks, D.W. and Comai, L. (1995) The REVOLUTA gene is necessary for apical meristem development and for limiting cell divisions in the leaves and stems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development, 121, 2723-2735.
32. Thompson, D.S., Wilkinson, S., Bacon, M.A. and Davies, W.J. (1997) Multiple signals and mechanisms that regulate leaf growth and stomatal behaviour during water deficit. Physiol. Plant, 100, 303-313.
33. Tsukaya, N., Naito, S., Redei, G. and Komeda, Y. (1993) A new class of mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana, acaulis1, affecting the development of both inflorescences and leaves. Development, 118, 761-764.
34. Weller, J.L., Reid, J.B., Taylor, S.A. and Murfet, I.C. (1997) The genetic control of flowering in pea. Trends Plant Sci. 2, 412-418.
35. Wisman, E., Hartmann, U., Sagasser, M., Baumann, E., Palme, K., Hahlbrock, K., Saedler, H. and Weisshaar, B. (1998) Knock-out mutants from an En-1 mutagenized Arabidopsis thaliana population generate phenylpropanoid biosynthesis phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 12432-12437.