Economic perspectives of using indicators

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 98, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 477-482

  Osinski, Elisabeth ^a   Kantelhardt, Jochen ^a   Heissenhuber, Alois ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecological indicator; Ecological value; Economic indicator; Economic modelling; Economic value; Landscape model

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES;

GOES; STIZOSTEDION LUCIOPERCA;

EID: 0141615667     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00106-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ahrens, H., 1992. Gesellschaftliche Aspekte der Honorierung von Umweltleistungen in der Landwirtschaft. In: Bayerisches Staatsministerium fuer Landesentwicklung und Umweltfragen (Ed.), Untersuchung zur Definition und Quantifizierung von landschaftspflegerischen Leistungen der Landwirtschaft nach oekologischen und oekonomischen Kriterien, Materialien, vol. 84, pp. 117-150.
2. Braeuer, 2003. Money as an indicator: to make use of economic evaluation for biodiversity conservation. In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 483-491.
3. Carson, R.T., Haneman, W.M., Kopp, R.J., Krosnick, J.A., Mitchell, R.C., Presser, S., Ruud, P.A., Smith, V.K., Conaway, M., Martin, K., 1997. Temporal reliability of estimates from contingent valuation. Land Econ. 73 (2), 151-163.
4. CBD (Convention on biological diversity), 1992. http://www.biodiv.org/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf.
5. COM (Commission of the European Communities), 1998. State of Application of Regulation (EEC) No. 2078/92: Evaluation of Agri-Environment Programmes. Commission Working Document, VI/7655/98.
6. Gerowitt, B., Isselstein, J., Marggraf, R., 2003. Rewards for ecological goods - requirements and perspectives for agricultural land use. In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 541-547.
7. Haeckel, E., 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. 2 Bde. Berlin.
8. Hampicke, U., 1998. Oekonomische Bewertungsgrundlagen und die Grenzen einer 'Monetarisierung' der Natur. In: Theobald, W. (Ed.), Integrative Umweltbewertung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 95-117.
9. Herrmann, St., Dabbert, S., Schwarz-von-Raumer, H.-G., 2003. Threshold values for nature protection areas as indicators for bio-diversity - a regional evaluation of economic and ecological consequences. In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 493-506.
10. Kahn, J.R., 1995. The economic approach to environmental and natural resources. Dryden Press, Fort Worth.
11. Kantelhardt, J., Osinski, E., Heissenhuber A., 2003. Is there a reliable correlation between hedgerow density and agricultural site conditions? In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 517-527.
12. Mello, I., Heissenhuber, A., Kantelhardt, J., 2002. Das conservation reserve program der USA - eine moeglichkeit zur effizienten entlohnung von umweltleistungen der landwirtschaft? Berichte ueber Landwirtschaft 80 (1), 85-93.
13. Meyer-Aurich, A., Zander, P., 2003. Consideration of biotic environmental quality targets in agricultural land use - a case study from the biosphere reserve Schorfheide-Chorin. In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 529-539.
14. Oppermann, R., 2003. Nature balance scheme for farms - evaluation of the ecological situation. In: Buechs, W. (Ed.), Biotic Indicators for Biodiversity and Sustainable Agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 463-475.
15. Pannell, D.J., 1997. Introduction to Practical Linear Programming. Wiley, New York.
16. Pannell, D.J., Schilizzi, S., 1999. Sustainable agriculture: a matter of ecology, equity, economic efficiency or expedience. J. Sustain. Agric. 13 (4), 57-66.
17. Plachter, H., 1992. Grundzuege der naturschutzfachlichen Bewertung, Sonderdruck aus: Veroeffentlichungen f. Naturschutz u. Landschaftspflege in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Bd. 67, Karlsruhe.
18. Turner, R.K., Pearce, D., Bateman, I., 1999. Environmental economics: an elementary introduction. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
19. Usher, M.B., 1994. Erfassen und Bewerten von Lebensraeumen: Merkmale, Kriterien, Werte. In: Usher, M.B., Erz, W. (Eds.), Erfassen und Bewerten im Naturschutz. Quelle und Meyer, Heidelberg, pp. 17-47.
20. Wronka, T.C., 1998. Was ist der Preis fuer Umwelt? Moeglichkeiten und Grenzen des kontingenten Bewertungsansatzes. Agribusiness Forschung No. 6. Inst. fuer Agribusiness, Leipzig, 85 p.
21. Wronka, T.C., Thiele, H., 2002. Transfer von Umweltgueterbewertungen: Moeglichkeiten, Grenzen und empirische Evidenz. Schriften der Gesellschaft fuer Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V. 37, 287-293.