Temporal reliability of estimates from contingent valuation

Land Economics

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 151-163

  Carson, Richard T ^a   Hanemann, W Michael ^b   Kopp, Raymond J ^c   Krosnick, Jon A ^d   Mitchell, Robert C ^e   Presser, Stanley ^f   Ruud, Paul A ^b   Smith, V Kerry ^g   Conaway, Michael ^c,h   Martin, Kerry ^c,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^g Duke University   (United States)

^h Nat Rsrc Damage Assessment Inc

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHOLOGICAL EVALUATION; POLLUTION CONTROL; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

USA, ALASKA, PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND;

EID: 0030670603     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3147279     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alberini, A. 1995. "Testing Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data." Land Economics 71 (Feb.):83-95.
2. Bockstael, N. B., and K. E. McConnell. 1993. "Public Goods as Characteristics of Nonmarket Commodities." Economic Journal 103 (9):1244-57.
3. Cameron, T. A., and J. Quiggin. 1994. "Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a 'Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up' Questionnaire." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (3):218-34.
4. Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith. 1994. "Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight." Report to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA. September.
5. Carson, R. T., and R. C. Mitchell. 1993. "The Value of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness to Pay for Beatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water." Water Resources Research 29 (7):2445-54.
6. Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell, W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P. A. Ruud. 1992. "A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill." Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska.
7. Carson, R. T., J. Wright, N. Carson, A. Alberini, and N. Flores. 1995. "A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers." Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.
8. Diamond, P., and J. A. Hausman. 1994. "Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4):45-64.
9. Haab, T. C., and K. E. McConnell. 1996. "Count Data Models and Recreational Demand." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1):89-102.
10. Hanemann, W. M. 1988. "Three Approaches to Defining 'Existence' or Nonuse Values Under Uncertainty." Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley. July.
11. _. 1994. "Contingent Valuation and Economics." Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4):19-44.
12. Hanemann, W. M., J. B. Loomis, and B. J. Kanninen. 1991. "Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (4):1255-63.
13. Jordan, Donald L. 1993. "Newspaper Effects on Policy Preferences." Public Opinion Quarterly 57:191-204.
14. Kanninen, B. J. 1995. "Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (1):114-25.
15. Kopp, R. J., and K. A. Pease. 1997. "Contingent Valuation: Economics, Law and Politics." In Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, eds. R. J. Kopp, W. Pommerehne, and N. Schwarz. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff (forthcoming).
16. Krutilla, J. V. 1967. "Conversation Reconsidered." American Economic Review 57 (4):777-86.
17. Ladd, Everett Carl, and Karlyn H. Bowman. 1995. Attitudes Toward the Environment: Twenty-five Years After Earth Day. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Press.
18. Larson, Douglas. 1993. "On Measuring Existence Value." Land Economics 69 (Nov.):377-89.
19. Loomis, J. B. 1989. "Test-Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1):76-84.
20. _. 1990. "Comparative Reliability of the Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Techniques." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18 (1):78-85.
21. McConnell, K. E. 1983. "Existence and Bequest Value." In Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at the National Parks and Wilderness Areas, eds. R. D. Rowe and L. G. Chestnut. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. _. 1990. "Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 78 (1):19-34.
23. Mitchell, Robert C., and Richard T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
24. Plourde, C. 1975. "Conservation of Extinguishable Species." Natural Resources Journal 15 (4):791-97.
25. Randall, Alan. 1991. "Nonuse Benefits." In Measuring the Demand for Environmental Commodities, eds. J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad. Amsterdam: North Holland.
26. Smith, V. Kerry. 1987. "Nonuse Values in Benefit Cost Analysis." Southern Economic Journal 54 (July):19-26.
27. Turnbull, B. W. 1976. "The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored and Truncated Data." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B38:290-95.
28. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1966. Income Distribution in the United States, by Herman P. Miller, a 1960 Census Monograph. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.