Academic Guide Maps for Learning Psychology

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 240-242

  Motes, Michael A ^a   Susanne Bahr, G ^a   Atha Weldon, Cindy ^a   Dansereau, Donald F ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141461649     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 433-440.
2. Brooks, L. W., & Dansereau, D. F. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 811-820.
3. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1996). Node-link mapping as an alternative to traditional writing assignments in undergraduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 91-96.
4. Dansereau, D. F. (1995). Derived structural schemas and the transfer of knowledge. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 93-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Dees, S. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). A visual representation system for drug abuse counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11, 517-523.
6. Griggs, R. A., Jackson, S. L., Christopher, A. N., & Marek, P. (1999). Introductory psychology textbooks: An objective analysis and update. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 182-189.
7. Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 25-29.
8. Mayer, R. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 371-383.
9. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71-86.
10. Ohlhausen, M. M., & Roller, C. M. (1986). Teaching students to use a nation schema to learn about countries. Journal of Reading, 30, 212-217.
11. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 37-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Skaggs, L. P., Rewey, K. L., & Paulus, P. (1990, June). Using derived schemas and scripts to improve learning of biological information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Dallas, TX.
14. Wiegmann, D. A., & von Thaden, T. L. (2003). Using schematic aids to improve recall incident reporting: The Critical Event Reporting Tool (CERT). International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 153-171.