A general analysis of field-based molecular similarity indices

Journal of Mathematical Chemistry

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 251-270

  Maggiora, Gerald M ^a   Petke, James D ^a   Mestres, Jordi ^a  

^a Pharmacia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARAMETER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THEORY;

EID: 0042932146     PISSN: 02599791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020784004649     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. P. Willett, Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems (Wiley, New York, 1987).
2. M.A. Johnson and G.M. Maggiora (eds.), Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity (Wiley, New York, 1990).
3. P.M. Dean (ed.), Molecular Similarity in Drug Design (Chapman-Hall, London, 1995).
4. A.C. Good and W.G. Richards, Explicit calculation of 3D molecular similarity, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design 9-11 (1998) 321-338.
5. V.J. Gillet, D.J. Wild, P. Willett and J. Bradshaw, Similarity and dissimilarity methods for processing chemical structure databases, Comp. J. 41 (1998) 547-558.
6. P.E. Bowen-Jenkins, D.L. Cooper and W.G. Richards, Ab initio computation of molecular similarity, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 2195-2197.
7. E.E. Hodgkin and W.G. Richards, A semi-empirical method for calculating molecular similarity, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1986) 1342-1344.
8. D.L. Cooper and N.L. Allan, A novel approach to molecular similarity, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 3 (1989) 253-259.
9. A.Y. Meyer and W.G. Richards, Similarity of molecular shape, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 5 (1991) 427-439.
10. R.B. Hermann and D.K. Herron, OVID and SUPER: Two overlap programs for drug design, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 5 (1991) 511-524.
11. J. Cioslowski and E.D. Fleischmann, Assessing molecular similarity from results of ab initio electronic structure calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 64-67.
12. C. Amovilli and R. McWeeny, Shape and similarity: Two aspects of molecular recognition, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 227 (1991) 1-9.
13. A.M. Richard, Quantitative comparison of molecular electrostatic potentials for structure-activity studies, J. Comput. Chem. 12 (1991) 959-969.
14. A.C. Good, The calculation of molecular similarity: Alternative formulas, data manipulation and graphical display, J. Mol. Graph. 10 (1992) 144-151.
15. C.A. Reynolds, C. Burt and W.G. Richards, A linear molecular similarity index, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 11 (1992) 34-35.
16. C. Lee and S. Smithline, An approach to molecular similarity using density functional theory, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 1135-1138.
17. R. Carbó, L. Leyda and M. Arnau, How similar is a molecule to another? An electron density measure of similarity between two molecular structures, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 17 (1980) 1185-1189.
18. R. Carbó and L. Domingo, LCAO-MO similarity measures and taxonomy, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 32 (1987) 517-545.
19. P.G. Mezey, Shape in Chemistry: An Introduction to Molecular Shape and Topology (VCH Publishers, New York, 1993) chapter 2.
20. A.C. Good and W.G. Richards, Rapid evaluation of shape similarity using Gaussian functions, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 33 (1993) 112-116.
21. E.E. Hodgkin and W.G. Richards, Molecular similarity based on electrostatic potential and electric field, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp. 14 (1987) 105-110.
22. W.G. Richards and E.E. Hodgkin, Molecular similarity, Chem. Br. 24 (1988) 1141-1144.
23. C. Burt, W.G. Richards and P. Huxley, The application of molecular similarity calculations, J. Comput. Chem. 11 (1990) 1139-1146.
24. C. Burt and W.G. Richards, Molecular similarity: The introduction of flexible fitting, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 4 (1990) 231-238.
25. F. Manaut, F. Sanz, J. Jose and M. Milesi, Automatic search for maximum similarity between molecular electrostatic potential distributions, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 5 (1991) 371-380.
26. F. Sanz, F. Manaut, J.A. Sanchez and E. Lozoya, Maximum electrostatic similarity between biomolecules optimizing both relative positions and conformations, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 230 (1991) 437-446.
27. F. Sanz, F. Manaut, J. Rodríguez, E. Lozoya and E. López-de-Briñas, MEPSIM: A computational package for analysis and comparison of molecular electrostatic potentials, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 7 (1993) 337-347.
28. J.D. Petke, Cumulative and discrete similarity analysis of electrostatic potentials and fields, J. Comput. Chem. 14 (1993) 928-933.
29. D.J. Wild and P. Willett, Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures. Alignment of molecular electrostatic potential fields with a genetic algorithm, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (1996) 159-167.
30. A.C. Good, E.E. Hodgkin and W.G. Richards, Utilization of Gaussian functions for the rapid evaluation of molecular similarity, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32 (1992) 188-191.
31. F. Croizet, M.H. Langlois, J.P. Dubost, P. Braquet, E. Audry, Ph. Dallet and J.C. Colleter, Lipophilicity force field profile: An expressive visualization of the lipophilicity molecular potential gradient, J. Mol. Graph. 8 (1990) 153-155.
32. W. Heiden, G. Moeckel and J. Brickmann, A new approach to analysis and display of local lipophilicity/hydrophilicity mapped on molecular surfaces, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 7 (1993) 503-514.
33. P. Gaillard, P. Carrupt, B. Testa and A. Boudon, Molecular lipophilicity potential, a tool in 3D QSAR: Method and applications, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 8 (1994) 83-96.
34. R.G.A. Bone and H.O. Villar, Discriminating D1 and D2 agonists with a hydrophobic similarity index, J. Mol. Graph. 13 (1995) 201-208.
35. I. Rozas, Q. Du and G.A. Arteca, Interrelation between electrostatic and lipophilicity potentials on molecular surfaces, J. Mol. Graph. 13 (1995) 98-108.
36. G.A. Arteca and D.R. Van Allen, Three-dimensional lipophilicity characterization of molecular pores and channel-like cavities, J. Mol. Graph. 14 (1996) 235-242.
37. Q. Du, G.A. Arteca and P.G. Mezey, Heuristic lipophilicity potential for computer-aided rational drug design, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 11 (1997) 503-515.
38. D. Robert and R. Carbó-Dorca, A formal comparison between molecular quantum similarity measures and indices, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1998) 469-475.
39. R. Carbó, B. Calabuig, E. Besalú and A. Martinez, Triple density res: A general connection between theoretical calculations and experimental results, Mol. Engineering 2 (1992) 43-64.
40. E. Besalú, R. Carbó, J. Mestres and M. Solà, Foundations and recent developments in molecular quantum similarity, Topics Curr. Chem. 173 (1995) 31-62.
41. R. Carbó, E. Besalú, L. Amat and X. Fradera, On quantum molecular similarity measures (QMSM) and indices (QMSI), J. Math. Chem. 19 (1996) 47-56.
42. M. Petitjean, Geometric molecular similarity from volume-based distance minimization: Application to saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin, J. Comput. Chem. 16 (1995) 80-90.
43. M. Petitjean, Three-dimensional pattern recognition from molecular distance minimization, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (1996) 1038-1049.
44. A. Tversky, Features of similarity, Psychol. Rev. 84 (1977) 327-352.
45. M.I. Skvortsova, I.I. Baskin, I.V. Stankevich, V.A. Palyulin and N.S. Zefirov, Molecular similarity. 1. Analytical description of the set of graph similarity measures, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1998) 785-790.
46. S.K. Kearsley and G.M. Smith, An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap, Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 3 (1990) 615-633.
47. J. Mestres, D.C. Rohrer and G.M. Maggiora, MIMIC: A molecular-field matching program. Exploiting applicability of molecular similarity approaches, J. Comput. Chem. 18 (1997) 934-954.
48. J. Mestres, D.C. Rohrer and G.M. Maggiora, A molecular field-based similarity approach to pharmacophoric pattern recognition, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 15 (1997) 114-121.
49. J. Mestres, D.C. Rohrer and G.M. Maggiora, A molecular field-based similarity study of non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 13 (1999) 79-93.
50. J. Mestres, D.C. Rohrer and G.M. Maggiora, A molecular field-based similarity study of non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. 2. The relationship between alignment solutions obtained from conformationally rigid and flexible matching, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, in press.
51. G. Klebe, T. Mietzner and F. Weber, Different approaches toward an automatic structural alignment of drug molecules: Applications to sterol mimics, thrombin and thermolysin inhibitors, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 8 (1994) 751-778.
52. G. Klebe, T. Mietzner and F. Weber, Methodological developments and strategies for a fast flexible superposition of drug-size molecules, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 13 (1999) 35-49.
53. M.F. Parretti, R.T. Kroemer, J.H. Rothman and W.G. Richards, Alignment of molecules by the Monte Carlo optimization of molecular similarity indices, J. Comput. Chem. 18 (1997) 1344-1353.
54. C. Lemmen, C. Hiller and T. Lengauer, RigFit: A new approach to superimposing ligand molecules, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 12 (1998) 491-502.
55. A.C. Good, In Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, ed. P.M. Dean (Chapman-Hall, London, 1995) p. 24.
56. A.C. Good, S.-S. So and W.G. Richards, Structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices, J. Med. Chem. 36 (1993) 433-438.
57. A.C. Good, S.J. Peterson and W.G. Richards, QSARs from similarity matrices. Technique validation and application in the comparison of different similarity evaluation methods, J. Med. Chem. 36 (1993) 2929-2937.
58. R. Benigni, M. Cotta-Ramusino, F. Georgi and G. Gallo, Molecular similarity matrices and quantitative structure-activity relationships: A case study with methodological implications, J. Med. Chem. 38 (1995) 629-635.
59. D.C. Horwell, W. Howson, M. Higginbottom, D. Naylor, G.S. Ratcliffe and S. Williams, Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) of N-terminus fragments of NK1 tachykinin antagonists: A comparison of classical QSARs and three-dimensional QSARs from similarity matrices, J. Med. Chem. 38 (1995) 4454-4462.
60. C.A. Montanari, M.S. Tute, A.E. Beezer and J.C. Mitchell, Determination of receptor-bound drug conformations by QSAR using flexible fitting to derive a molecular similarity index, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 10 (1996) 67-73.
61. X. Fradera, L. Amat, E. Besalú and R. Carbó-Dorca, Application of molecular quantum similarity to QSAR, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 16 (1997) 25-32.
62. M. Lobato, L. Amat, E. Besalú and R. Carbó-Dorca, Structure-activity relationships of a steroid family using quantum similarity measures and topological quantum similarity indices, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 16 (1997) 465-472.
63. S.S. So and M. Karplus, Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices and genetic neural networks. 1. Method and validations, J. Med. Chem. 40 (1997) 4347-4359.
64. G.J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets' and Fuzzy Logic - Theory and Applications (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995) chapter 3.
65. P. Dennery and A. Krzywicki, Mathematics for Physicists (Harper & Row, New York, 1967) p. 182.