Explicit Calculation of 3D Molecular Similarity

Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design

Volumn 9, Issue , 1998, Pages 321-338

  Good, Andrew C ^a   Richards, W Graham ^b  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001202274     PISSN: 09282866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-46857-3_17     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Cramer, R.D. III, DePriest, S.A., Patterson D.E. and Hecht, P., The developing practice of Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, In 3D QSAR in drug design, Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 443-485.
2. Martin, Y.C., Bures, M.G., Danaher, E.A., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I. and Pavlik, P.A., A few new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 83-102.
3. Hopfinger, A.J., A QSAR investigation of DHFR inhibiton by Bakers Triazines based upon molecular shape analysis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102 (1980) 7196-7206.
4. Hopfinger, A.J., Theory and analysis of molecular potential energy fields in molecular shape analysis: A QSAR study of 2,4-diamino-5-benzylpyrimidines as DHFR inhibitors, J. Med. Chem., 26 (1983) 990-996.
5. Hermann, R.B. and Herron, D.K., OVID and SUPER: Two overlapprograms for drug design, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 511-524.
6. Masek, B.B., Merchant, A. and Matthew, J.B., Molecular shape comparisons of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 1230-1238.
7. Carbo, R., Leyda, L. and Arnau, M., An electron density measure of the similarity between two compounds, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 17 (1980) 1185-1189.
8. Downs, G.M. and Willett, P., Similarity searching in databases of chemical structures, In Lipkowitz, K.B. and Boyd, D.B. (Eds.) Reviews in computational chemistry, Vol. 7, VCH, New York, 1995. pp. 1-66.
9. Holland, J.D., Ranade, S.S. and Willett, P., A fast algorithm for selecting sets of dissimilar molecules from large chemical databases, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 14 (1995) 501-506.
10. Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G., Molecular similarity based on electrostatic potential and electric field, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp., 14 (1987) 105-110.
11. Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G., Molecular similarity, Chem. Br., (1988) 1141-1144.
12. Petke, J.D., Cumulative and discrete similarity analysis of electrostatic potentials and fields, J. Comp. Chem., 14 (1993) 928-933.
13. Bowen-Jenkins, P.E. and Richards, W.G., Molecular similarity in terms of valence electron density, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1986) 133-135.
14. Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G., A semi-empirical method for calculating molecular similarity, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., (1986) 1342-1344.
15. Carbo, R. and Domingo, L., LCAO-MO similarity measures and taxonomy, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 32 (1987) 517-545.
16. Amovilli, C. and McWeeny, R., Shape and similarity: Two aspects of molecular recognition, J. Mol. Struct., 227 (1991) 1-9.
17. Cioslowski, J. and Fleischmann, E.D., Assessing molecular similarity from results of ab initio electronic structure calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 64-67.
18. Cooper, D.L. and Allen, N.L., A novel approach to molecular similarity, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 3 (1991) 253-259.
19. Burt, C., Huxley, P. and Richards, W.G., The application of molecular similarity calculations, J. Comp. Chem., 11 (1990) 1139-1146.
20. Burt, C. and Richards, W.G., Molecular similarity: The introduction of flexible fitting, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 4 (1990) 231-238.
21. Richard, A.M., Quantitative comparison of MEPs for structure activity studies, J. Comp. Chem., 12 (1991) 959-969.
22. Good, A.C., The calculation of molecular similarity: Alternative formulas, data manipulation and graphical display, J. Mol. Graph., 10 (1992) 144-151.
23. Good, A.C., Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, W.G., The utilisation of Gaussian functions for the rapid evaluation of molecular similarity, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 188-191.
24. Meyer, A.M. and Richards, W.G., Similarity of molecular shape, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 426-439.
25. Moon, J.B. and Howe, W.J., 3D database searching and de novo design construction methods in molecular design, Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1992) 697-711.
26. van Geerestein, V.J., Perry, N.J., Grootenhuis, P.D J. and Haasnoot, C.A.G., 3D database searching on the basis of shape using the SPERM prototype method. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1992) 595-613.
27. Good, A.C. and Richards, W.G., Rapid evaluation of shape similarity using Gaussian functions, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33 (1993) 112-116.
28. Nilakantan, R., Bauman, N. and Venkataraghavan, R., New method for rapid characterization of molecular shapes: Applications in drug design, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33 (1993) 79-85.
29. Hahn, M., Three-dimensional shape-based searching of conformationally flexible compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 80-86.
30. Namasivayam, S. and Dean, P.M., Statistical method for surface pattern matching between dissimilar molecules: Electrostatic potentials and accessible surfaces, J. Mol. Graph., 4 (1986) 46-50.
31. Chau, P.-L. and Dean, P.M., Molecular recognition: 3D surface structure comparison by gnomonic projection, J. Mol. Graph., 5 (1987) 97-100.
32. Dean, P.M. and Chau, P.-L., Molecular recognition: Optimised searching through molecular 3-space for pattern matches on molecular surfaces, J. Mol. Graph., 5 (1987) 152-158.
33. Dean, P.M., Callow, P. and Chau, P.-L., Molecular recognition: Blind searching for regions of strong structural match on the surfaces of two dissimilar molecules, J. Mol. Graph., 6 (1988) 28-34.
34. Manaut, M., Sanz, F., Jose, J. and Milesi, M., Automatic search for maximum similarity between MEP distributions, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 371-380.
35. Sanz, F., Manaut, F., Rodriguez, J., Lozoya, E. and Lopez-de-Brinao, E., MEPSIM: A computational package for analysis and comparison of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 337-347.
36. Perry, N.C. and van Geerestein, V.J., Database searching on the basis of 3D molecular similarity using the SPERM program, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 607-616.
37. Badel, A., Mornon, J.P. and Hazout, S., Searching for geometric molecular shape complementarity using bi-dimensional surface profiles, J. Mol. Graph., 10 (1992) 205-211.
38. Blaney, F.E., Finn, P., Phippen, R.W. and Wyatt, M., Molecular surface comparison: Application to molecular design, J. Mol. Graph., 11 (1993) 98-105.
39. Blaney, F.E., Naylor, D. and Woods, J., MAMBAS: A real time graphics environment for QSAR, J. Mol. Graph., 11 (1993) 157-165.
40. Reynolds, C.A., Burt, C. and Richards, W.G., A linear molecular similarity index, Quant. Struct.-Act, Relat., 11 (1992) 34-35.
41. Klebe, G., Abraham, U. and Mietzner, T., Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (ComSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4130-4146.
42. Kearsley, S.K. and Smith, G.M., An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structure: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 615-633.
43. Good, A.C., Peterson, S.J. and Richards, W.G., QSARs from similarity matrices: Technique validation and application in the comparison of different similarity evaluation methods, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 2929-2937.
44. Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R., Numerical Taxonomy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1973.
45. Good, A.C., 3D molecular similarity indices and their application in QSAR studies. In Dean, P.M. (Ed.) Molecular similarity in drug design, Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, 1995, pp. 138-162.
46. Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptor relevant to ligand-receptor binding, J. Chem, Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 1-9.
47. Burgess, E.M., Ruell, J.A., Zalkow, L.H. and Haugwitz, R.D., Molecular similarity from atomic electrostatic multipole comparisons: Application to anti-HIV drugs, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 1635-1640.
48. Measures, P.T., Mort, K.A., Allan, N.L. and Cooper, D.L., Applications of momentum space similarity, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 331-340.
49. Automated Similarity Package, developed and distributed by Oxford Molecular, the Medewar Centre, Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4 4GA, U.K.
50. Bone, R.G. and Villar, H.O., Discriminating D1 and D2 agonists with a hydrophobic similarity index, J. Mol. Graph., 13 (1995) 165-74.
51. Szabo, A. and Ostland, N.S., Modern quantum chemistry, Macmillan, New York, 1982, pp. 410-412.
52. McMahon, A.J. and King, P.M., Optimization of the Carbo molecular similarity index using gradient methods, J. Comp. Chem., 18 (1997) 151-158.
53. Wild, D.J. and Willett, P., Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: Alignment of molecular electrostatic potential fields with a genetic algorithm, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sco., 36 (1996) 159-167.
54. Thorner, D.A., Wild, D.J., Willett, P. and Wright, P.M., Similarity seearching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: Flexible field-based searching of molecular electrostatic potentials, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36 (1996) 900-908.
55. Frisch, M.J., Head, G.M., Schlegel, H.B., Ragnavachari, K., Binkley, J.S., Gonzalez, C., Defrees, D.J., Fox, D.J., Whiteside, R.A., Seeger, R., Melius, C.F., Baker, J., Martin, R., Kahn, L.R., Stewart, J.J.P., Fluder, E.M., Topiol, S. and Pople, J.A., Gaussian 88, Gaussian. Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
56. Grant, J.A. and Pickup, B.T., A Gaussian description of molecular shape, J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 3503-3510.
57. Grant, J.A., Gallardo, M.A. and Pickup, B.T., A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape, J. Compt. Chem., 17 (1996) 1653-1666.
58. Chapman, D., The measurement of molecular diversity: A three-dimensional approach, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 501-512.
59. Bladen, P., A rapid method for comparing and matching the spherical parameter surfaces of molecules and other irregular objects, J. Mol. Graph., 7 (1989) 130-137.
60. Blaney, F.E., Edge, C., Phippen, R.W., Molecular surface comparison: 2. Similarity of electrostatic surface vectors in drug design, J. Mol. Graph., 13 (1995) 165-74.
61. Connolly, M.L., Computation of molecular volume, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 1118-1124.
62. Connolly, M.L., Analytical molecular surface calculation, J. Appl. Cryst., 16 (1983) 548-558.
63. Masek, B.B., Merchant, A. and Matthew, J.B., Molecular skins: A new concept for quantitative shape matching of a protein with its small molecular mimics, Protein, 17 (1993) 193-202.
64. Perkins, T.D.J., Mills, J.E.J. and Dean, P.M., Molecular surface-volume and property matching to superpose flexible dissimilar molecules, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 479-490.
65. Seri-Levy, A. and Richards, W.G., Chiral drug potency: Pfeiffer's rule and computed chirality coefficients, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 4 (1993) 1917-1921.
66. Seri-Levy, A., West, S. and Richards, W.G., Molecular similarity, Quantitative chirality and QSAR for chiral drugs, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 1727-1732.
67. Dughan, L., Burt, C. and Richards, W.G., The study of peptide bond isosteres using molecular similarity, J. Mol. Struct., 235 (1991) 481-488.
68. Montanari, C.A., Tute, M.S., Beezer, A.E. and Mitchell, J.C., Determination of receptor-bound drug conformations by QSAR using flexible fitting to derive a molecular similarity index, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 67-73.
69. Cardozo, M.G., Kawai, T., Iimura, Y., Sugimoto, H., Yamanishi, Y. and Hopringer, A.J., Conformational analyses and molecular shape comparisons of a series ofinandone-benzylpiperidine inhibitors of acetyicholinesterase, J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 590-601.
70. Tokarski, J.S. and Hopfinger, A.J., Three-dimensional molecular shape and analysis-quantitative structure-activity relationship of a series of cholecystokinin-A receptor antagonists, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 3639-3654.
71. Burke, B.J., Dunn, W.J. III and Hopfinger, A.J., Construction of a molecular shape analysis-three-dimensinoal quantitative structure-analysis relationship for an analog series of pyridobenzodiazepinone inhibitor of muscarinic 2 and 3 receptor, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 3775-3788.
72. Rhyu, K.B., Patel, H.C. and Hopfinger, A.J., A 3D-QSAR study of anticoccoidial triazines using molecular shape analysis, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 35 (1995) 771-778.
73. Holzgrabe, U. and Hopfinger, A.J., Conformational analysis, molecular shape comparison, and pharmacophore identification of different allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36 (1996) 1018-1024.
74. Rum, G. and Herndon, W.C., Molecular similarity concepts: 5. Analysis of steroid protein binding constants, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 9055-9060.
75. Good, A.C., So, S. and Richards, W.G., Structure Activity Relationships from Similarity Matrices, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 433-438.
76. Horwell, D.C., Howson, W., Higginbottom, M., Naylor, D., Ratcliffe, G.S. and Williams, S., Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) of N-terminus fragments of NK1 tachykinin antagonists: A comparison of classical QSARs and three-dimensional QSARs from similarity matrices, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 4454-4462.
77. Good, A.C., Ewing, T.J.A., Gschwend, D.A. and Kuntz, I.D., New molecular shape descriptors: Application in database screening, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 1-12.
78. Bemis, G.W. and Kuntz, I.D., A fast efficient method for 2D and 3D molecular shape description, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 6 (1992) 607-628.
79. Fisanick, W., Cross, K.P. and Rusinko, A. III, Similarity searching on CAS registry substances: 1. Global molecular property and generic atom triangle geometric searching, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 664-674.
80. Norel, R., Fischer, D., Wolfson, H.J. and Nussinov, R., Molecular Surface Recognition by a Computer Vision Based Technique, Protein Eng., 7 (1994) 39-46.
81. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions, J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269-288.
82. Good, A.C. and Kuntz, I.D., Investigating the extension of pair-wise distance pharmacophore measures to triplet based descriptors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 373-379.
83. Pickett, S.D., Mason, J.S. and Mclay, I.M., Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores -pharmacophore derived queries (PDQ), J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36 (1996) 1214-1233.
84. Davies, E.K. and Briant, C., Combinatorial chemistry library design using pharmacophore diversity, URL http://www.awod.com/netsci/Science/Combichem/feature05.htlm.
85. Chem-Diverse, developed and distributed by Chemical Deisng Ltd., Roundway House, Cromwell Park, Chipping Norton, Oxon OX7 5SR, U.K.
86. Lewis, R.A., Good, A.C. and Pickett, S.D., Quantification of molecular similarity and its application to combinatorial chemistry, In Computer-assisted lead finding and optimization. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on QSAR, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996, van de Waterbeemd, H., Testa, B. and Folkers, G.(Eds.) Wiley-VCH, Basel, 1997, 135-156.