Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: Insights from a prospective, randomised study

Heart

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1043-1049

  Gaster, A L ^a   Slothuus Skjoldborg, U ^b   Larsen, J ^b   Korsholm, L ^b   Von Birgelen, C ^c   Jensen, S ^a   Thayssen, P ^a   Pedersen, K E ^a   Haghfelt, T H ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042829397     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1043     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baptista J, di Mario C, Escaned J, et al. Intracoronary two-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the assessment of plaque morphologic features and the planning of coronary interventions. Am Heart J 1995;129:177-87.
2. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:947-52.
3. Hausmann D, Johnson JA, Sudhir K, et al. Angiographically silent atherosclerosis detected by intravascular ultrasound in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia: correlation with high density lipoproteins. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1562-70.
4. Nakamura S, Mahon DJ, Maheswaran B, et al. An explanation for discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:633-9.
5. Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, et al. Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973;47:162-9.
6. Waller BF, Roberts WC. Amount of narrowing by atherosclerotic plaque in 44 nonbypassed and 52 bypassed major epicardial coronary arteries in 32 necropsy patients who died within 1 month of aortocoronary bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:956-62.
7. White CW. Clinical applications of Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:10D-6D.
8. Thomas AC, Davies MJ, Dilly S, et al. Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. Br Heart J 1986;55:129-39.
9. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-42.
10. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995;91:1676-88.
11. Goldberg SL, Colombo A, Nakamura S, et al. Benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:996-1003.
12. Stone GW, Hodgson JM, St. Goar FG, et al. Improved procedural results of coronary angioplasty with intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon sizing. The clout pilot trial. Circulation 1997;95:2044-52.
13. Apostol JC, Attubato MJ, Davidson CJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stent placement improves clinical outcome for patients with high-grade lesion severity: observations from AVID [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:45A.
14. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the can routine ultrasound influence stent expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 2000;102:523-30.
15. Blasini R, Neumann FJ, Schmitt C, et al. Restenosis rate after intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:380-6.
16. Albiero R, Rau T, Schlütter M, et al. Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions. Circulation 1997;96:2997-3005.
17. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies-with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:320-8.
18. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde MF, et al. Medical costs over 18 months after stent implantation with versus without intravascular ultrasound guidance. Results of the randomized "restenosis after intravascular ultrasound stenting" (RESIST) study [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:3A.
19. Gaster AL, Slothuus U, Larsen J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of IVUS guided PCI versus conventional PCI. Scand J Cardiol 2001;35:80-5.
20. Mueller C, Hodgson JM, Frey A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions: economic analysis of the randomized SIPS trial [abstract]. Eur Heart J 2001;22:504.
21. Berry E, Kelly S, Hutton J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided interventions in coronary artery disease: a systematic literature review, with decision-analytic modelling, of outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-117.
22. de Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla HR, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the multicenter ultrasound stenting in coronaries study (MUSIC study). Eur Heart J 1998;19:1214-23.
23. Haase J, Keane D, di Mario C, et al. How reliable are geometric coronary measurements? In vitro and in vivo validation of digital and cinefilmbased quantitatie coronary analysis systems. In: Serruys PW, ed. Quantitative coronary angiography in clinical practice. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Press, 1994:27-49.
24. Ellis SG, Vandormael M, Cowley M, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel disease: implications for patient selection. Circulation 1990;82:1193-202.
25. Chan YCL. Improving hospital cost accounting with activity-based costing. Health Care Manage Rev 1993;18:71-7.
26. Cooper R, Kaplan RS. The design of cost management system. Text and cases. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Inc, 1999.
27. Drummond MF, O'Brian B, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
28. Larsen J, Slothuus U. The feasibility of applying acivity-based costing to determine treatment costs in a Danish hospital. In: Slothuus U, ed. Economic evaluation in health care. Issues in costing, willingness to pay, measurement with applications to arthritis and heart disease. Odeus, Denmark: Odeuse University Press, 2001:86-120.
29. Slothuus U, Larsen J. Cost of stable angina pectoris. In: Slothuus U, ed. Economic evaluation in health care. Issues in costing, willingness to pay, measurement with applications to arthritis and heart disease. Odeus, Denmark: Odeuse University Press, 2001:122-64.
30. Frey A, Hodgson JM: Strategy of IVUS-guided PTCA and stenting trial [abstract]. Circulation 1997;96:1222.
31. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS study). Circulation 2001;104:1343-9.