Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention

Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 80-85

  Gaster, Anne Louise ^b   Slothuus, Ulla ^b   Larsen, Jytte ^a   Thayssen, Per ^b   Haghfelt, Torben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cost efficiency analysis; Intravascular ultrasound; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BALLOON; CATHETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY STENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; DIRECT SERVICE COSTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0035011852     PISSN: 14017431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/140174301750164673     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91: 350-356.
2. Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Lesperance J. Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 1974; 49: 703-708.
3. Isner JM, Donaldson RF. Coronary angiographic and morphologic correlation. Cardiol Clin 1984; 2: 571-592.
4. Pepine CJ, Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Conti R. Coronary angiography: potentially serious sources of error in interpretation. Cardiovasc Med 1977: 747-756.
5. Alfonso F, Goncalves M, Goicolea J, et al. Feasibility of intravascular ultrasound studies: predictors of imaging success before coronary interventions. Clin Cardiol 1997; 20: 1010-1016.
6. Bruiníng N, Sabate M, Serruys PW. Clinical implications of intravascular ultrasound imaging for stenting procedures [editorial; comment]. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 207-210.
7. Schroeder S, Baumbach A, Haase KK, et al. Reduction of restenosis by vessel size adapted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 875-879.
8. Stone GW, Hodgson JM, St. Goar FG, et al. Improved procedural results of coronary angioplasly with intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon sizing. The clout pilot trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 2044-2052.
9. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde MF, et al. Medical costs over 18 months after stent implantation with versus without intravascular ultrasound guidance. Results of the randomized "REstenosis after intravascular ultrasound STenting" (RESIST) study [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 3A.
10. Albiero R, Rau T, Schlütter M, et al. Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions. Circulation 1997; 96: 2997-3005.
11. Maehara A, Apostol JC, Attubato MJ, et al. Incomplete stent apposition as determined by post-procedure intravascular ultrasound does not effect clinical outcome after elective coronary stent placement: a report from AVID and CRUISE. J Am Coll Cardiol Suppl February: 45A.
12. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies - with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 320-328.
13. Delacrétaz E, Hayoz D, Kaufmann U, Meier B. Anwendung und bedeutung der intravaskulären ultraschallbildgebung. Praxis 1997; 86: 655-658.
14. Cavaye DM, White RA. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: development and clinical applications. Int Angiol 1993; 12(3): 245-255.
15. Emanuelsson H. Future challenges to coronary angioplasty: perspectives on intracoronary imaging and physiology. J Intern Med 1995; 238(2): 111-119.
16. de Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla HR, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1214-1223.
17. Chan YCL. Improving hospital cost accounting with Activity-Based Costing. Health Care Manage Rev 1993; 18: 71-77.
18. Cooper R, Kaplan RS, editors. The design of cost management system. Text and cases. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1999.
19. Drummond MF, O'Brian B, Stoddart GL, et al., editors. Methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
20. Nishanian G, Kopchok GE, Donayre CE, White RA. The impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on endovascular interventions. Semin Vasc Surg 1999; 12: 285-299.
21. Apostol JC, Attubato MJ, Davidson CJ. et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stent placement improves clinical outcome for patients with high-grade lesion severity: observations from AVID. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 45A.