Control of cross-over by single-strand DNA resection

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 428-431

  Prado, Félix ^a   Aguilera, Andrés ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

DNA SEQUENCE; GENE CONTROL; GENE CONVERSION; GENOMICS; MEIOSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0042706141     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00173-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kupiec M. Damage-induced recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451:2000;91-105.
2. Paques F., Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1999;349-404.
3. Prado F., et al. Mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 42:2002;185-198.
4. Sung P., et al. Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451:2000;257-275.
5. Symington L.S. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:2002;630-670.
6. Roeder G.S. Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 11:1997;2600-2621.
7. Bishop A.J., Schiestl R.H. Homologous recombination as a mechanism for genome rearrangements: environmental and genetic effects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9:2000;2427-2434.
8. Szostak J.W., et al. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 33:1983;25-35.
9. Neale M.J., et al. Wild-type levels of Spo11-induced DSBs are required for normal single-strand resection during meiosis. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;835-846.
10. Sugawara N., Haber J.E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1992;563-575.
11. Sun H., et al. Extensive 3′-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 64:1991;1155-1161.
12. White C.I., Haber J.E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9:1990;663-673.
13. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell. 76:1994;51-63.
14. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell. 83:1995;783-791.
15. Sogo J.M., et al. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science. 297:2002;599-602.
16. Zou H., Rothstein R. Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell. 90:1997;87-96.
17. Fogel, S. et al. (1981) Mechanisms of meiotic gene conversion, 'wanderings on a foreign strand'. In The Molecular Biology of the Yeast, Life Cycle and Inheritance (Strathern, J.N. et al., eds), pp. 289-339, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
18. Esposito M.S. Evidence that spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75:1978;4436-4440.
19. Haber J.E., Hearn M. Rad52-independent mitotic gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae frequently results in chromosomal loss. Genetics. 111:1985;7-22.
20. Kupiec M., Petes T.D. Allelic and ectopic recombination between Ty elements in yeast. Genetics. 119:1988;549-559.
21. Richardson C., et al. Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12:1998;3831-3842.
22. Roman H. Recombination in diploid vegetative cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 45:1980;211-245.
23. McGill C., et al. Coconversion of flanking sequences with homothallic switching. Cell. 57:1989;459-467.
24. Hastings P.J. Recombination in the eukaryotic nucleus. BioEssays. 9:1988;61-64.
25. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 106:2001;47-57.
26. Inbar O., et al. The relationship between homology length and cross-over during the repair of a broken chromosome. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;30833-30838.
27. Kogoma T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:1997;212-238.
28. Mosig G. Recombination and recombination-dependent DNA replication in bacteriophage T4. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:1998;379-413.
29. Malkova A., et al. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;7131-7136.
30. Aguilera A. Genetic evidence for different RAD52-dependent intrachromosomal recombination pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 27:1995;298-305.
31. Malagon F., Aguilera A. Differential intrachromosomal hyper-recombination phenotype of spt4 and spt6 mutants of S. cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 30:1996;101-106.
32. Aguilera A. Double-strand break repair: are Rad51/RecA-DNA joints barriers to DNA replication? Trends Genet. 17:2001;318-321.
33. Ahn B.Y., et al. Effect of limited homology on gene conversion in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid recombination system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1988;2442-2448.
34. Jinks-Robertson S., et al. Substrate length requirements for efficient mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1993;3937-3950.
35. Klar A.J., Strathern J.N. Resolution of recombination intermediates generated during yeast mating type switching. Nature. 310:1984;744-748.
36. Aguilera A., Klein H.L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics. 123:1989;683-694.
37. Ahn B.Y., Livingston D.M. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:1986;3685-3693.
38. Godwin A.R., Liskay R.M. The effects of insertions on mammalian intrachromosomal recombination. Genetics. 136:1994;607-617.
39. Symington L.S., et al. Alteration of gene conversion tract length and associated cross-over during plasmid gap repair in nuclease-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2000;4649-4656.
40. Malkova A., et al. HO endonuclease-induced recombination in yeast meiosis resembles Spo11- induced events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;14500-14505.
41. Gloor G.B., et al. Targeted gene replacement in Drosophila via P element-induced gap repair. Science. 253:1991;1110-1117.
42. Ferguson D.O., Holloman W.K. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;5419-5424.
43. Haber J.E. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:1998;561-599.