Academic offences and e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 467-477

  Underwood, Jean ^a   Szabo, Attila ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERNET; LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

E-LEARNING;

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0042322968     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8535.00343     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ashworth P, Bannister P and Thorne P (1997) Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment Studies in Higher Education 22, 187-203.
2. Austin M J and Brown L D (1999) Internet plagiarism: developing strategies to curb student academic honesty The Internet and Higher Education 2, 21-33.
3. Benning V (1998) High-tech cheating hits the campus: computers make it easy for college students to break rules The Washington Post A01.
4. Berls J (1998) Teachers turn copycat to nab computer-powered plagiarists; Internet, CD-ROM references make cheating easier, some say Chicago Tribune 7.
5. Connors M (1996) Cybercheating: the Internet could become the newest battleground in academic fraud The Muse Available at http://ursu.uregina.ca/_carillon/Sept12.96/feature/featurel.html, site visited November 1998.
6. Davis S F, Grover C A, Becker A H and Mcgregor L N (1992) Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16-20.
7. Doolan M and Baker T (2001) An online discussion forum to support group assignments: exploring the problem of ownership Paper presented at the CAL'01 conference, University of Warwick, April.
8. Elsenberger R and Schank D M (1985) Personal work ethic and effort training affect cheating Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 520-528.
9. Hickman J (1998) Cybercheats: term-paper shopping online The New Republic 218, 14-16.
10. McCabe D L (1999) CAI research available at http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp site visited January 2003.
11. _ (2001) Students cheating in American high schools Available at http://www.academicintegrity.org/hs01.asp site visited January 2003.
12. Malouff J M and Sims R L (1996) Applying an employee-motivation model to prevent student plagiarism Journal of Education for Business 72, 58-61.
13. Moon J (1999) How to,., stop students from cheating The Times Higher Education Supplement September 3, 1999.
14. Quittner J (1997) The great term-paper flap Time 22, Available at http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/magazine/notebook_tech.the_great_ter.htm, site visited January 2003.
15. Pew Internet and American Life Project by the American Institutes for Research Washington; August 14, 2002, Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=67) site visited January 2003.
16. Roberts R and Sapio B (1998) Structural analysis using signed evaluations; distance learning into the new millennium Futures 30, 323-343.
17. Roig M (1999) When college students' attempts at paraphrasing become instances of potential plagiarism Psychological Reports 84, 973-982.
18. Ryan J (1998) Student plagiarism in an online world PRISM Online Available at http://www.asee.org/prism/decemberstudent_plagiarism_in_an_online.htm, site visited January 2003.
19. Stebelman S (1998) Cybercheating: dishonesty goes digital ASAP 8, 4.
20. Tibbetts S G (1999) Differences between women and men regarding decisions to commit test cheating Research in Higher Education 40, 323-342
21. Underwood J D M (2003) Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices British Journal of Psychology In press.
22. Vigue D (1997) Educators fighting a web of deceit The Boston Globe Available at http://www.computernewsdaily.com/147_052797_130001_8138.html, site visited January 2003.
23. Walker A (2001) British psychology students' perceptions of group-work and peer assessment Psychology, Learning and Teaching 1, 28-36.