Solvation dynamics and evolution of the spatial extent of photoinjected electrons in D2O/Cu(111)

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 107, Issue 33, 2003, Pages 8706-8715

  Bovensiepen, Uwe ^a   Gahl, Cornelius ^a   Wolf, Martin ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; COPPER; DEUTERIUM COMPOUNDS; FERMI LEVEL; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SINGLE CRYSTALS;

ANGLE-RESOLVED PHOTOEMISSION SPECTRA; CONDUCTION BAND; ELECTRON LOCALIZATION; MOLECULAR REORIENTATION; PHOTOINJECTED ELECTRON; SOLVATION DYNAMICS; TWO-PHOTON PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0042287845     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp034654g     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barnett, R. N.; Landman, U.; Nitzan, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 106.
2. Weber, J. M.; Kim, J.; Woronowicz, E. A.; Weddle, G. H.; Becker, I.; Cheshnovsky, O.; Johnson, M. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 339, 337.
3. Migus, A.; Gauduel, Y.; Martin, J. L.; Antonetti, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 1559.
4. Long, F. H.; Lu, H.; Eisenthal, K. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 1469.
5. Silva, C.; Walhout, P. K.; Yokoyama, K.; Barbara, P. F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 1086, 80.
6. Emde, M. F.; Baltuska, A.; Kummrow, A.; Pshenichnikov, M. S.; Wiersma, D. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 4645.
7. Laenen, R.; Roth, T.; Lauberau, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 50.
8. Schnitker, J.; Motakabbir, K.; Rossky, P. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 456.
9. Prezhdo, O. V.; Rossky, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17094.
10. Yang, C.-Y.; Wong, K. F.; Skaf, M. S.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 3598.
11. Hertwig, A.; Hippler, H.; Unterreiner, A.-N. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 4412.
12. Lehr, L.; Zanni, M. T.; Frischkorn, C.; Weinkauf, R.; Neumark, D. M. Science 1999, 284, 635.
13. Kevan, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 138.
14. Son, D. H.; Kambhampati, P.; Kee, T. W.; Barbara, P. F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 342, 571.
15. Son, D. H.; Kambhampati, P.; Kee, T. W.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8269.
16. Kambhampati, P.; Son, D. H.; Kee, T. W.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 2374.
17. Höfer, U.; Shumay, I. L.; Reuss, Ch.; Thomann, U.; Wallauer, W.; Fauster, Th. Science 1997, 277, 1480.
18. Roth, M.; Pickel, M.; Wang, J.; Weinelt, M.; Fauster, Th. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 096802.
19. Ge, N.-H.; Wong, C. M.; Lingle, R. L. Jr.; McNeill, J. D.; Gaffney, K. J.; Harris, C. B. Science 1998, 279, 202.
20. Marinica, D. C.; Ramseyer, C.; Borisov, A. G.; Teillet-Billy, D.; Gauyacq, J. P.; Berthold, W.; Feulner, P.; Höfer, U. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 046802.
21. Gahl, C.; Bovensiepen, U.; Frischkorn, C.; Morgenstern, K.; Rieder, K.-H.; Wolf, M. Surf. Sci. 2003, 108, 532-535.
22. Gahl, C.; Bovensiepen, U.; Frischkorn, C.; Wolf, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 107402.
23. Miller, A. D.; Bezel, I.; Gaffney, K. J.; Garrett-Roe, S.; Liu, S. H.; Szymanski, P.; Harris, C. B. Science 2002, 297, 1163.
24. Liu, S. H.; Miller, A. D.; Gaffney, K. J.; Szymanski, P.; Garrett-Roe, S.; Bezel, I.; Harris, C. B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 12908.
25. Knoesel, E.; Hotzel, A.; Wolf, M. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 12812.
26. Stevenson, K. P.; Kimmel, G. A.; Dohnálek, Z.; Smith, R. S.; Kay, B. D. Science 1999, 283, 1505.
27. Hinch, B. J.; Dubois, L. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 3262.
28. Held, G.; Menzel, D. Surf. Sci. 1995, 327, 301.
29. The term "bilayer" refers to the puckered structure of bulk ice.
30. Smith, R. S.; Kay, B. D. Nature 1999, 398, 788.
31. gap taken at 50% threshold.
32. Coe, J. C. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 20, 33.
33. Pépin, C.; Goulet, T.; Houde, D.; Jay-Gerin, J.-P. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 4351.
34. s to the low energy background takes into account changes of the detection probability.
35. Petek, H.; Ogawa, S. Prog. Surf. Sci. 1997, 56, 239.
36. To match the experimentally observed energy levels, a dielectric constant of 3 and an electron affinity of 0.3 eV were used for the dielectric continuum model.
37. ∥ was assumed and deviations of the final state from free electron behavior parallel to the surface were neglected.
38. Chulkov, E. V.; Silkin, V. M.; Echenique, P. M. Surf. Sci. 1999, 437, 330.
39. McNeil, J. D.; Lingle, R. L.; Jordan, R. E.; Padowitz, D. F.; Harris, C. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 3883.
40. Hotzel, A. Ph.D. Thesis. Freie Universität Berlin, 1999, chapter 4; http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/1999/55/indexe.html.
41. Bergman, R.; Swenson, J. Nature 2000, 403, 283.
42. Anderson, N. A.; Hang, K.; Asbury, J. B.; Lian, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 329, 386.
43. Hertwig, A.; Hippler, H.; Unterrainer, A. N. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter A 2000, 12, 165.
44. Gillis, H. A.; Quickenden, T. I. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 80.
45. Vilchiz, V. H.; Kloepfer, J. A.; Germaine, A. C.; Lenchenkov, V. A.; Bradforth, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1711.
46. F or the kinetic energy is used, the axis has to be multiplied by -1, because a lower electron energy requires a higher photon energy to photoexcite the solvated electron into CB or the continuum and vice versa.