Phylogeny of phagotrophic eugulenids (Euglenozoa): A molecular approach based on culture material and environmental samples

Journal of Phycology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 828-836

  Busse, Ingo ^a   Patterson, David J ^b   Preisfeld, Angelika ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anisonema; Bayesian inference; Dinema; Entosiphon; Molecular phylogeny; Notosolenus; Peranema; Petalomonas; Ploeotia; SSU rDNA

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENY;

ALGAE; ANISONEMA; ENTOSIPHON; EUGLENA; EUGLENIDA; EUGLENOZOA; EUKARYOTA; NOTOSOLENUS; NOTOSOLENUS OSTIUM; PETALOMONAS; PETALOMONAS CANTUSCYGNI; PLOEOTIA;

EID: 0042065264     PISSN: 00223646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02178.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Brugerolle, G., Lom, J., Nohynkova, E. & Joyon, L. 1979. Comparaison et évolution des structures cellulaires chez plausieurs especes de bodonidés et cryptobiidés appartenant aux genres Bodo, Cryptobia et Trypanoplasma (Kinetoplastida, Mastigophora). Protistologica 15:197-221.
2. Buckley, T. R., Arensburger, P., Simon, C. & Chambers, G. K. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18.
3. Busse, I. & Preisfeld, A. 2002. Phylogenetic position of Rhynchopus sp. and Diplonema ambulator as indicated by analyses of euglenozoan small subunit ribosomal DNA. Gene 284:83-91.
4. Busse, I. & Preisfeld, A. 2003a. Application of spectral analysis to examine phylogenetic signal among euglenid SSU rDNA data sets (Euglenozoa). Org. Divers. Evol. 3:1-12.
5. Busse, I. & Preisfeld, A. 2003b. Discovery of a group I intron in the SSU rDNA of Ploeotia costata (Euglenozoa). Protist 154:57-69.
6. Busse, I. & Preisfeld, A. 2003c. Systematics of primary osmotrophic euglenids: a molecular approach to the phylogeny of Distigma and Astasia (Euglenozoa). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:617-24.
7. Bütschli, O. 1884. Protozoa. In Bronn, H. G. [Ed.] Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs 2, Abt. II Mastigophora. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig, pp. 617-1097.
8. Calkins, G. 1933. The Biology of the Protozoa. Lea & Febinger, Philadelphia, 607 pp.
9. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1993. Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla. Microbiol. Rev. 57:953-94.
10. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1995. Zooflagellate phylogeny and classification. Tsitologiia 37:1010-29.
11. Charleston, M. A. 1998. Spectrum: spectral analysis of phylogenetic data. Bioinformatics 14:98-9.
12. Edgcomb, V. P., Kysela, D. T., Teske, A., de Vera Gomez, A. & Sogin, M. L. 2002. Benthic eukaryotic diversity in the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7658-62.
13. Ekelund, F. & Patterson, D. J. 1997. Some heterotrophic flagellates from a cultivated garden soil in Australia. Arch. Protistenkd. 148:461-78.
14. Farmer, M. A. 1988. A Re-Evaluation of the Taxonomy of the Euglenophyceae Based on Ultrastructural Characteristics. Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, PhD thesis.
15. Farmer, M. A. & Triemer, R. E. 1988a. Flagellar systems in the euglenoid flagellates. Biosystems 21:283-91.
16. Farmer, M. A. & Triemer, R. E. 1988b. A redescription of the genus Ploeotia Duj. (Euglenophyceae). Taxon 37:319-25.
17. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47:9-17.
18. Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. 1993. Spectral analysis of phylogenetic data. J. Classif 15:5-24.
19. Hollande, A. 1942. Étude cytologique et biologique de quelques flagellés libres. Volvocales, Cryptomonadines, Eugléniens, Promastigines. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 83:1-268.
20. Hollande, A. 1952. Classe des Eugléniens (Euglenoidina) Bütschli, 1884. In Grassé, P. P. [Ed.] Traité de Zoologie. 1. Masson et Cie., Paris, pp. 238-84.
21. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. 1955. Das Phytoplankton des Süßwassers. Band XV, 4. Teil, Euglenophyceen. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele und Obermiller), Stuttgart, 1135 pp.
22. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2001. A Bayesian perspective on the Strepsiptera problem. Tijdschr. Entomol. 144:165-78.
23. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B., Miller, R. E. & Ronquist, F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-88.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inferencc of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-5.
25. Klebs, G. 1883. Über die Organisation einiger Flagellaten-Gruppen und ihre Bezichungen zu Algen und Infusorien. Unlersuchung. Botan. Inst. Tübingen 1:233-62.
26. Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C. & Serio, G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates: J. Mol. Evol. 20:86-93.
27. Larsen, J. & Patterson, D.J. 1990. Some flagellates (Protista) from tropical marine sediments. J. Nat. Hist. 24:801-937.
28. Leache, A. D. & Reeder, T. W. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51:44-68.
29. Leander, B. S. & Farmer, M. A. 2000. Comparative morphology of the euglenid pellicle. I. Patterns of strips and pores. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:469-79.
30. Leander, B. S. & Farmer, M. A. 2001a. Comparative morphology of the euglenid pellicle. II. Diversity of strip substructures. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 48:202-17.
31. Leander, B. S. & Farmer, M. A. 2001b. Evolution of Phacus (Euglenophyceae) as inferred from pellicle morphology and SSU rDNA. J. Phycol. 37:143-59.
32. Leander, B. S., Triemer, R. E. & Farmer, M. A. 2001a. Character evolution in heterotrophic euglenids. Eur. J. Protistol. 37:337-56.
33. Leander, B. S., Witek, R. P. & Farmer, M. A. 2001b. Trends in the evolution of the euglenid pellicle. Evolution 55:2215-35.
34. Leedale, G. F. 1967. Euglenoid Flagellates. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
35. Lemmermann, E. 1913. Chrysomonadinae, Cryptomonadinae, Eugleninae, Chloromonadinae und gefärbte Flagellaten unsicherer Stellung. In Pascher, A. [Ed.] Die Süsswasser-Flora Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz, 2. Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp. 115-74.
36. Lento, G. M., Hickson, R. E., Chambers, G. K. & Penny, D. 1995. Use of spectral analysis to test hypotheses on the origin of pinnipeds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:28-52.
37. Levine, N. D., Corliss, J. O., Cox, F. E., Deroux, G., Grain, J., Honigberg, B. M., Leedale, G. F., Loeblich, A. R. 3rd, Lom, J., Lynn, D., Merinfeld, E. G., Page, F. C., Poljansky, G., Sprague, V., Vavra, J. & Wallace, F. G. 1980. A newly revised classification of the Protozoa. J. Protozool. 27:37-58.
38. Lewis, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf: Trends. Ecol. Evol. 16:30-7.
39. Linton, E. W., Hittner, D., Lewandowski, C., Auld, T. & Triemer, R. E. 1999. A molecular study of euglenoid phylogeny using small subunit rDNA. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46:217-23.
40. Linton, E. W., Nudelmann, M. A., Conforti, V. & Triemer, R. E. 2000. A molecular analysis of the euglenophytes using SSU rDNA. J. Phycol. 36:740-6.
41. Linton, E. W. & Triemer, R. E. 1999. Reconstruction of the feeding apparatus in Ploeotia costata (Euglenophyta) and its relationship to other euglenoid feeding apparatuses. J. Phycol. 35:313-24.
42. Linton, E. W. & Triemer, R. E. 2001. Reconstruction of the flagellar apparatus in Ploeotia costata (Euglenozoa) and its relationship to other euglenoid flagellar apparatuses. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 48:88-94.
43. Lockhart, P. J., Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-12.
44. Lopez-Garcia, P., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Pedros-Alio, C. & Moreira, D. 2001. Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409:603-7.
45. Mignot, J.-P. 1966. Structure et ultrastructure de quelques euglénomonadines. Protistologica 2:51-117.
46. Montegut-Felkner, A. E. & Triemer, R. E. 1994. Phylogeny of Diplonema arnbulator (Larsen and Patterson). 1. Homologies of the flagellar apparatus. Eur. J. Protistol. 30:227-37.
47. Montegut-Felkner, A. E. & Triemer, R. E. 1996. Phylogeny of Diplonema ambulator (Larsen and Patterson). 2. Homologies of the feeding apparatus. Eur. J. Protistol. 32:64-76.
48. Montegut-Felkner, A. E. & Triemer, R. E. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of selected euglenoid genera based on morphological and molecular data. J. Phycol. 33:512-9.
49. Moreira, D. & Lopez-Garcia, P. 2002. The molecular ecology of microbial eukaryotes unveils a hidden world. Trends. Microbiol. 10:31-8.
50. Müllner, A. N., Angeler, D. G., Samuel, R., Linton, E. W. & Triemer, R. E. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of phagotrophic, phototrophic and osmotrophic euglenoids by using the nuclear 18S rDNA sequence. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:783-91.
51. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-8.
52. Preisfeld, A., Berger, S., Busse, I., Liller, S. & Ruppel, H. G. 2000. Phylogenetic analyses of various euglenoid taxa (Euglenozoa) based on 18S rDNA sequence data. J. Phycol. 36:220-6.
53. Preisfeld, A., Busse, I., Klingberg, M., Talke, S. & Ruppel, H. G. 2001. Phylogenetic position and inter-relationships of the osmotrophic euglenids based on SSU rDNA data, with emphasis on the Rhabdomonadales (Euglenozoa). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:751-8.
54. Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J. L., Marin, A. & Medina, J. R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:485-501.
55. Senn, G. 1900. Eugleninae. In Engler, A. & Prantl, K. [Eds.] Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1. Engehnann, Leipzig, pp. 173-85.
56. Shin, W., Brosnan, S. & Triemer, R. E. 2002. Are cytoplasmic pockets (MTR/pocket) present in all photosynthetic euglenoid genera? J. Phycol. 38:790-9.
57. Simpson, A. G. B. 1997. The identity and composition of the Euglenozoa. Arch. Protistenkd. 148:318-28.
58. Simpson, A. G. B., van den Hoff, J., Bernard, C., Burton, H. & Patterson, D. J. 1996-1997. The ultrastructure and systematic position of the euglenozoon Postgaardi mariagerensis, Fenchel et al. Arch. Protistenkd. 147:213-25.
59. Sogin, M. L., Elwood, H. J. & Gunderson, J. H. 1986. Evolutionary diversity of eukaryotic small-subunit rRNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:1383-7.
60. Steel, M. A. 1994. Recovering a tree from the Markov leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-23.
61. Stein, F. 1878. Der Organismus der Infusionsthiere. III. Abteilung. Der Organismus der Flagellaten. Engelmann, Leipzig, 154 pp.
62. Surek, B. & Melkonian, M. 1986. A cryptic cytostome is present in Euglena. Protoplasma 133:39-49.
63. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
64. Tamura, K. & Nei, M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:512-26.
65. Triemer, R. E. 1985. Ultrastructural features of mitosis in Anisonema sp. (Euglenida).J. Protozool. 43:683-90.
66. Triemer, R. E. 1988. Ultrastructure of mitosis in Entosiphon sulcatum. J. Protozool. 35:231-7.
67. Triemer, R. E. & Farmer, M. A. 1991a. The ultrastructural organization of the heterotrophic euglenids and its evolutionary implications. In Patterson, D. J. & Larsen, J. [Eds.] The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Flagellates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 185-204.
68. Triemer, R. E. & Farmer, M. A. 1991b. An ultrastructural comparison of the mitotic apparatus, feeding apparatus, flagellar apparatus and cytoskeleton in euglenoids and kinetoplastids. Protoplasma 164:91-104.
69. Triemer, R. E. & Fritz, L. 1988. Ultrastructural features of mitosis in Ploeotia costata (Heteronematales, Euglenophyta). J. Phycol. 24:514-9.
70. Triemer, R. E. & Ott, D. W. 1990. Ultrastructure of Diplonema ambulator Larsen & Patterson (Euglenozoa) and its relationship to Isonema. Eur. J. Protistol. 25:316-20.
71. Whittingham, L. A., Slikas, B., Winkler, D. W. & Sheldon, F. H. 2002. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Ayes: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:430-41.
72. Wilcox, T. P., Zwickl, D. J., Heath, T. A. & Hillis, D. M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:361-71.
73. Willey, R. L. & Wibel, R. G. 1985. A cytostome/cytopharynx in green euglenoid flagellates (Euglenales) and its phylogenetic implications. Biosystems 18:369-76.
74. Wu, C. I. & Li, W. H. 1985. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:1741-5.