Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - Z100 in Glass II restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 145-149

  Ferrari, Marco ^a,b,c   Davidson, Carel L ^d  

^a Research Center for Dentistry   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0030203271     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-resin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399.
2. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quint Int 1987; 2:62-69.
3. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance of posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 53-58.
4. Donly KJ, Jensen ME. Posterior composite Class II restorations: In vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 88-93.
5. Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 585-587.
6. Prati C. Early marginal leakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 392-398.
7. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class II composite resin restorations. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 39-42.
8. De Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 1994; 22: S21-S27.
9. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 1994; 22: 97-102.
10. Mjör IA. Direct posterior filling materials. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G. State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Euro-Disney, Paris, 1993.
11. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 133-138.
12. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent 1992; 5: S81-S94.
13. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphological relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 19-23.
14. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, et al. Microleakage of Class V composite restorations: A comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 237-245.
15. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Gesi A, et al. A preliminary report of an experimental design for in vivo testing of bonded restoration applied to a new enamel-dentinal bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 465-467.
16. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993; 21: 158-162.
17. Lundin SA, Nören JG, Werfinge J. Marginal bacteria leakage and pulp reaction in Class II composite resin restorations in vivo. Swed Dent J 1990; 14: 185-192.
18. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1987; 69: 1240-1243.
19. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 297-300.
20. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quint Int 1986; 17: 777-784.
21. Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Ferrari M, et al. SEM evaluation of outside dentin-cementum layer at cervical margins of Class II restorations. CED-IADR Congress, Lubliana, September 1995.
22. Cagidiaco MC. Bonding to dentin. Mechanism, morphology and efficacy of bonding resin composites to dentin in vitro and in vivo. PhD thesis, De Batte Ed., Livorno, 1995.
23. Blackwood HJJ. Intermediate cementum. Br Dent J 1957; 102: 345-347
24. Bradford EW. Microanatomy and histochemistry of dentin. In: Miles AEW. Structural and chemical organization of teeth. New York: Academic Press, 1967; Vol II.
25. Seltzer S, Bender I. The dental pulp. Biological considerations in dental procedures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Co., 1975.
26. Chappel RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, et al. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: A potential factor in adhesive bonding? J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 183-188.
27. Gwinnett AJ. Chemically conditioned dentin: A comparison of conventional and environmental scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 150-155.
28. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM, et al. Phosphoric acid as a dentin etchant. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 24-28.
29. Titley K, Chernecky R, Chan A, et al. The composition and ultrastructure of resin tags in etched dentin. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 224-230.
30. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, et al. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 403 (Abstr 20).
31. Ferrari M, Mason PN. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: An in vivo investigation. Quint Int 1993; 24: 861-865.
32. Dietschi D, Scampa V, Campanile G, et al. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: An in vitro evaluation. Quint Int 1995; 26: 127-138.
33. Baharav H, Cardash HS, Pilo R, et al. The efficacy of liquid and gel acid etchants. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 545-547.
34. Swift EJ, Triolo PT. Bond strengths of Scotchbond Multipurpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 318-320.