The major clades of Loasaceae: Phylogenetic analysis using the plastid matK and trnL-trnF regions

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1215-1228

  Hufford, Larry ^a   McMahon, Michelle M ^a,c   Sherwood, Anna M ^a   Reeves, Gail ^b,d   Chase, Mark W ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Loasaceae; Maximum likelihood; Parsimony; Phylogeny; Shimodaira Hasegawa (SH) test; Systematics

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

BARTONIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; EUCNIDE; LOASA; LOASACEAE; MENTZELIA; MENTZELIA TORREYI; SCHISMOCARPUS; TORREYI;

EID: 0041926467     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.8.1215     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. AXELROD, D. I. 1950. Evolution of desert vegetation in western North America. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 590: 215-306.
2. BAILLON, H. E. 1888. The natural history of plants, vol. 3. Reeve and Company, London, UK.
3. BARTLING, F. T. 1825. Ordines Naturales Plantarum. Diettrich, Göttingen, Germany.
4. BLAKE, S. F. 1918. New plants from Oaxaca. Contributions of the Gray Herbarium, New Series 53: 55-65.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. BROWN, D. K. 1971. A study of floral morphology in the Loasaceae with emphasis on relationships among the subfamilies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
7. BUCKLEY, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology; evidence from empirical data sets. Systematic Biology 51: 509-523.
8. BUCKLEY, T. R., C. SIMON, H. SHIMODAIRA, AND G. K. CHAMBERS. 2001. Evaluating hypotheses on the origin and evolution of the New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada) using multiple-comparison tests of tree topology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 223-234.
9. CRONQUIST, A. 1978. The biota of the intermountain region in a geohistorical context. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 2: 3-15.
10. DANIELS, G. S. 1970. The floral biology and taxonomy of Mentzelia section Bicuspidaria (Loasaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
11. DARLINGTON, J. 1934. A monograph of the genus Mentzelia. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 21: 103-227.
12. DAVIDSON, A. 1916. A revision of the western mentzelias. Southern California Academy of Sciences 5: 13-18.
13. DAVIS, W. S., AND H. J. THOMPSON. 1967. A revision of Petalonyx (Loasaceae) with a consideration of affinities of subfamily Gronovioideae. Madroño 19: 1-18.
14. DE JUSSIEU, A. L. 1804. Memoire sur les Loasa, Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 5: 19-27.
15. DICKSON, A. 1866. On the morphological constitution of the androecium of Mentzelia, and its analogy with that of certain Rosaceae. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 8: 288-298.
16. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
17. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
18. ENDLICHER, S. L. 1841. Genera Plantarum, Supplement 1. Beck, Vienna, Austria.
19. ERIKSSON, T. 1999. AutoDecay ver. 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
20. ERNST, W. R., AND H. J. THOMPSON. 1963. The Loasaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 44: 138-142.
21. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
22. FLORENCE, J. 1985. Sertum polynesicum. I. Plakothira Florence (Loasaceae), genre nouveau des îles Marquises. Adansonia 1: 239-245.
23. GILG, E. 1895. Loasaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 3 (6a), 100-121. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
24. GILG, E. 1925. Loasaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., 21, 522-543. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
25. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
26. GRAHAM, A. 1993. History of the vegetation: Cretaceous (Maastichtian)-Tertiary. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee [eds.], Flora of North America, vol. 1, 57-70. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
27. GRAU, J. 1997. Huidobria, eine isolierte Gattung der Loasaceae aus Chile. Sendtnera 4: 77-93.
28. HAHN, 2002. A molecular phylogenetic study of the Palmae (Arecaceae) based on atpB, rbcL and 18S nr DNA sequences. Systematic Biology 51: 92-112.
29. HEMPEL, A. L. 1995. Molecular systematics of the Loasaceae. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
30. HEMPEL, A. L., AND R. K. JANSEN. 1996. Derivation of a florally diverse genus, Eucnide, from within Mentielia. American Journal of Botany 83(suppl.): 162 (Abstract).
31. HEMPEL, A., P. A. REEVES, R. G. OLMSTEAD, AND R. K. JANSEN. 1995. Implications of rbcL sequence data for higher order relationships of the Loasaceae and the anomalous aquatic plant Hydrostachys (Hydrostachyaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 194: 25-37.
32. HIRMER, M. 1916. Beiträge zur Morphologie polyandrischer Blüten. Flora 110: 140-192.
33. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. M. HILLIS, AND R. NIELSEN. 1996. A likelihood ratio test of monophyly. Systematic Biology 45: 546-558.
34. HUFFORD, L. 1988. Systematics of Loasaceae: a consideration of familial circumscription and a cladistic analysis of generic relationships. American Journal of Botany 75(suppl.): 181.
35. HUFFORD, L. 1990. Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 402-419.
36. HUFFORD, L., M. L. MOODY, AND D. E. SOLTIS. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Hydrangeaceae based on sequences of the plastid gene matK and their combination with rbcL and morphological data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 835-846.
37. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu sticto and Cilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
38. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 151-160.
39. LEACHÉ, A. D., AND T. W. REEDER. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Soeloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology 51: 44-68.
40. LEINS, P., AND W. WINHARD. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceen Blüten. Oesterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 122: 145-165.
41. MOODY, M. L., AND L. HUFFORD. 2000. Floral ontogeny and morphology of Cevallia. Fuertesia, and Gronovia (Loasaceae subfamily Gronovioideae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 869-883.
42. MOODY, M. L., L. HUFFORD, D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Loasaceae subfamily Gronovioideae inferred from matK and ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88: 326-336.
43. OLMSTEAD, R. G., K.-J. KIM, R. K. JANSEN, AND S. J. WAGSTAFF. 2000. The phylogeny of Asteridae sensu lato based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 96-112.
44. PAYER, J.-B. 1857. Traité de d'organogénie comparée de la fleur. StechertHafner, New York, New York, USA (1966 reprint).
45. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
46. POSTON, M. E., AND J. W. NOWICKE. 1993. Pollen morphology, trichome types, and relationships of the Gronovioideae (Loasaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 689-704.
47. POSTON, M. E., AND H. J. THOMPSON. 1977. Cytotaxonomic observations in Loasaceae subfamily Loasoideae. Systematic Botany 2: 28-35.
48. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor, version 1. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/Se-Al/Se-Al.html. Oxford, UK.
49. REICHENBACH, L. 1837. Handbuch des natürlichen Pflanzensystems. Arnold, Dresden, Germany.
50. RONSE-DECRAENE, L.-P., AND E. SMETS. 1987. The distribution and the systematic relevance of the androecial characters oligomery and polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 239-253.
51. RYDBERG, P. A. 1903. Some generic segregations. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 30: 271-281.
52. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
53. SILBERMAN, J. D., A. G. B. SIMPSON, J. KULDA, I. CEPICKA, V. HAMPL, P. J. JOHNSON, AND A. J. ROGER. 2002. Retortamonad flagellates are closely related to diplomonads - implications for the history of mitochondrial function in eukaryote evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 777-786.
54. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
55. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU. AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for the amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
56. THOMPSON, H. J., 1963. Cytotaxonomic observations on Mentzelia, sect. Bartonia (Loasaceae). Madroño 17: 16-22.
57. THOMPSON, H. J., AND W. R. ERNST. 1967. Floral biology and systematics of Eucnide (Loasaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 48: 56-88.
58. THOMPSON. H. J., AND H. LEWIS. 1955. Chromosome numbers in Mentzelia (Loasaceae). Madroño 13: 102-107.
59. TURMEL, M., M. EHARA, C. OTIS, AND C. LEMIEUX. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among streptophytes as inferred from chloroplast small and large subunit rRNA gene sequences. Journal of Phycology 38: 364-375.
60. URBAN, I., AND E. GILG. 1900. Monographia Loasacearum. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum 76: 1-370.
61. VAN DEVENDER, T R., R. S. THOMPSON, AND J. L. BETANCOURT. 1987. Vegetation history of the deserts of southwestern North America; the nature and timing of the Late Wisconsin-Holocene transition. In W. F. Ruddiman, and H. E. Wright. Jr. [eds.], North America and adjacent oceans during the last glaciation, 323-352. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
62. WEBER, W. A., AND R. G. WITTMANN. 2001. Colorado flora: eastern slope, 3rd ed. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
63. WEIGEND, M. 1997. Nasa and the conquest of South America. Ph.D. dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
64. WEIGEND, M., J. KUFER, AND A. A. MÜLLER. 2000. Phytochemistry and the systematics and ecology of Loasaceae and Gronoviaceae (Loasales). American Journal of Botany 87: 1202-1210.
65. XIANG, Q.-Y., M. L. MOODY, D. E. SOLTIS, C.-Z. FAN, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 2002. Relationships within Cornales and circumscriptions of Cornaceae - matK and rbcL sequence data and effects of outgroups and long branches. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 35-57.
66. XIANG, Q.-Y., D. E. SOLTIS, D. R. MORGAN, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornus sensu lato and putative relatives inferred from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 723-734.
67. XIANG, Q.-Y., D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred form matK and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297.