Effect of light source direction and restoration thickness on tensile strength of a dual-curable resin cement to copy-milled ceramic

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-134

  Foxton, Richard M ^a,b   Pereira, Patricia N R ^c   Nakajima, Masatoshi ^a   Tagami, Junji ^a   Miura, Hiroyuki ^b  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Fixed Prosthodontics ^*  (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISTITE RESIN CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HARDNESS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; RESIN CEMENTS; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0041851039     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. The Cerec 3-A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: Initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 699-712.
2. Roulet JF, Degrange M. Inlay Restorations. Can Dent Assoc J 1996; 9: 48-62.
3. Eidenbenz S, Lehner CR, Schärer P. Copy milling ceramic inlays from resin analogs: A practical approach with the celay system. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 134-142.
4. Goldstein RE. Esthetics in Dentistry. Ontario, B.C.Decker,1998; Vol. 1: 381-387.
5. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: A review. Aust Dent J 1999; 44: 157-168.
6. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 829-836.
7. Cook WD, Standish PM. Polymerization kinetics of resin-based restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1983; 17: 275-282.
8. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 60D-76D.
9. Harashima I, Nomata T, Hirasawa T. Degree of conversion of dual-cured composite luting cements. Dent Mater J 1991; 10: 8-17.
10. Althoff O, Hartung M. Advances in light curing. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 77D-81D.
11. Stansbury, J. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 300-308.
12. Chan KC, Boyer DB. Curing light-activated composite cement through porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 476-480.
13. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 295-300.
14. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, El-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 38-44.
15. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerisation of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 48-55.
16. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent; 1995 73: 515-24.
17. Della Bona A, Van Noort R. Shear vs. Tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1591-1596.
18. Chadwick RG, Mason AG, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems- what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 610-615.
19. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test Dent Mater 1994; 10: 236-240.
20. Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawamoto C, et al. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and cavity adaptation of Cerec 2 inlay restoration. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 59-63.
21. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, et al. Regional measurement of resin-dentine bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 699-705.
22. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 3D-18D.
23. Rueggeberg FA, Ergle JW, Mettenburg DJ. Polymerization depths of contemporary light-curing units using microhardness. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 340-349.
24. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: Adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 240-249.
25. O'Keefe KL, Miller BH, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of adhesive cements to new post materials. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 47-51.
26. Berry T, Barghi N, Chung K. Effect of water storage on the silanization in porcelain repair strength. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 459-163.
27. Barghi N, Berry T, Chung K. Effects of timing and heat treatment of silanated porcelain on bond strength. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 407-412.
28. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness enjoint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 245-249.
29. Sjögren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 24-28.