Microtensile bond strength to dentin and cavity adaptation of Cerec 2 inlay restoration

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 59-63

  Uno, Shigeru ^a   Tanaka, Toru ^a   Kawamoto, Chiharu ^a   Konishi, Junko ^a   Sano, Hidehiko ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREC; CLAPEARL DC; CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; FLUOROCEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; VITA MARK II; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMAN; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 0034173257     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Leinfelder K, Isenberg B, Essig M. A new method for generating ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118: 703-707.
2. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, et al. Chairside computer-aided ceramic inlay. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 329-339.
3. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, et al. CAD-CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: A case report after 3 years in place. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 517-520.
4. Mörmann WH. International symposium on computer restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991; 17-18.
5. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts, et al. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992; 20: 171-177.
6. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Mueninghoff LM, et al. Clinical evaluation of Cerec CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 308 (Abstr 1597).
7. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102: 186-192.
8. Sjögren G, Bergman M, Molin M, et al. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec®) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50: 171-178.
9. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, et al. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992; 20: 18-26.
10. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995; 23: 329-338.
11. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant J, et al. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramics inlays: A four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1171-1181.
12. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlay (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 263-267.
13. Sturdevant JR, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, et al. Composite cement thickness of Cerec CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 296 (Abstr 245).
14. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-206.
15. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength. Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 236-240.
16. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, et al. Adhesive testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 117-125.
17. Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998;14: 44-50.
18. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 158-161.
19. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 508-513.
20. Imai T, Itoh K, Tani C, et al. Effectiveness of simplified dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater J 1998; 17: 1-10.
21. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Harada J, et al. Effects of de/remineralization on bonding using self-etching primers. J Dent Res 1999;78:226 (Abstr 964).
22. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, et al. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1999;78:284 (Abstr 1429).
23. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 880-882.
24. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
25. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 167-171.
26. Uno S, Shimokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity. Dent Mater J 1994; 13: 19-24.
27. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Williams DF. Cuspal deflection during polymerisation of composite lutes of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1999; 27:29-36.
28. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Interfacial gaps of resin cemented ceramics inlays. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 116-120.
29. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Ceramic inlay movement during polymerization of resin luting cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 186-189.
30. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 392-339.