Support vector machines for ADME property classification

QSAR and Combinatorial Science

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 533-548

  Trotter, Matthew W B ^a   Holden, Sean B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG PRODUCTS;

BASE FUNCTION; BINARY CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DRUG DISCOVERY; EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTRON ALGORITHMS; PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHOD; SUPPORT VECTORS MACHINE;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG CLASSIFICATION; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG EXCRETION; DRUG METABOLISM; MACHINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0041670909     PISSN: 1611020X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200310006     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. V. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, USA, 1995.
2. N. Christianini and J. Shawe-Taylor. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
3. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2001.
4. J. Mercer. Functions of Positive and Negative Type and Their Connection with the Theory of Integral Equations. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 1909, A209, pp. 415-446.
5. M. G. Genton. Classes of Kernels for Machine Learning: A Statistics Perspective. Journal of Machine Learning, 2001, 2, pp. 299-312.
6. M. Anthony and P. Bartlett. Learning in Neural Networks: Theoretical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
7. C. M. Bishop. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, 1995.
8. D. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
9. J. R. Quinlan. Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning, 1986, 1, pp. 81-106.
10. E. Osuna, R. Freund and F. Girosi. An Improved Training Algorithm for Support Vector Machines. IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 1997.
11. A. Zien, G. Ratsch, S. Mika, B. Scholkopf, C. Lemmen, A. Smola, T. Lengauer and K.-R. Muller. Engineering Support Vector Machine Kernels that Recognize Translation Initiation Sites. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16 (9), pp. 799-807.
12. J.-P. Vert. A Tree Kernel to Analyze Phylogenetic Profiles. Bioinformatics, 2002, 1 (1), pp. 1-9.
13. P. Sollich. Probabilistic methods for Support Vector Machines. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen and K.-R. Muller, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000, pp. 349-355.
14. R. Kohavi. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1995, pp. 1137-1142.
15. D. Tax and R. Duin. Data Domain Description by Support Vectors. In M. Vefieysen, editor, Proc. ESANN, D. Facto Press, Brussels, Belgium, 1999, pp. 251-256.
16. C.-W. Hsu and C.-J. Lin. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2001.
17. D. T. Manallack and D. J. Livingstone. Neural Networks for Drug Discovery: Have They Lived Up to Their Promise? Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1999, 34, pp. 195-208.
18. L. Van Hijfte, G. Marciniak and N. Froloff. Combinatorial Chemistry, Automation and Molecular Diversity: New Trends in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Chromatography, 1999, 725, pp. 3-15.
19. A. P. Beresford, H. E. Selick and M. H. Tarbit. The Emerging Importance of Predictive ADME Simulation in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 2002, 7 (2), pp. 109-116.
20. G. Karet. Are You Screening Too Many Compounds? Drug Discovery and Development (Online), http://www.dddmag.com, March 2000.
21. M. A. Hollinger. Introduction to Pharmacology. Taylor & Francis, Washington DC, USA, 1997.
22. D. H. Drewry and S. S. Young. Approaches to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1999, 48, 120.
23. P. J. Goodford. A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favourable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules. J. Med. Chem., 1995, 28, pp. 849-857.
24. G. Cruciani, M. Pastor and W. Guba. VolSurf, A New Image Processing Method for 3D Grid Map and QSAR Studies. Europ. J. Pharm. Sci., 2000, 11, pp. 29-39.
25. MDL. MACCS-II Menu Reference Manual - version 2.2 MDL Information Systems, San Leandro, CA, 1994.
26. C. A. James, D. Weininger and J. Delaney, Daylight Theory Manual - Daylight 4.71 Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc., 27401 Los Altos, Suite #360, Mission Viejo, CA, 2000.
27. L. Eriksson and E. Johansson. Multivariate Design and Modeling in QSAR. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1996, 34, pp. 1-19.
28. V. Gillet, P. Willett and J. Bradshaw. Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Chemical Information in Computer Science, 1998, 38, pp. 165-179.
29. D. Corney. Intelligent Analysis of Small Data Sets for Food Design, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, UK, 2002.
30. W. P. Walters and M. A. Murcko. Prediction of Drug-Likeness. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2002, 54, pp. 255-271.
31. X. Ajay, W. P. Walters and M. A. Murcko. Can we Learn to Distinguish Between Drug-Like and Nondrug-Like Molecules? J. Med. Chem., 1998, 41, pp. 3314-3324.
32. J. Sadowski and H. Kubinyi. A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating Between Drugs and Non-drugs. J. Med. Chem., 1998, 41, pp. 3325-3329.
33. J. Sadowski, Optimization of Chemical Libraries by Neural Networks. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2000, 4, pp. 280-282.
34. J. Devillers. Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design. Academic Press, New York, USA, 1996.
35. J. Devillers. Genetic Algorithms in Molecular Modeling, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1996.
36. D. M. Hawkins, S. S. Young and A. Rusinko. Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1997, 16 (4), pp. 296-302.
37. R. Burbidge, M. W. B. Trotter, S. B. Holden and B. F. Buxton. Drug Design by Machine Learning: Support Vector Machines for Pharmaceutical Data. Computers and Chemistry, 2001, 26 (1), pp. 4-15.
38. M. K. Warmuth, J. Liao, G. Ratsch, M. Mathieson, S. Putta and C. Lemmen. Support Vector Machines for Active Learning in the Drug Discovery Process. To appear in JCICS, 2003.
39. M. Mathieson. Applying Active Learning Using Support Vector Machines to Drug-Finding Data. Masters Thesis, University of California, Sant Cruz, CA, 2002.
40. B. F. Buxton, P. C. Treleaven, S. B. Holden and W. B. Langdon. Robust Classification and Knowledge Engineering Techniques. www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/rocket, University College Londen, UK, 2002.
41. M. Embrechts, C. Breneman and K. Bennett. Automated Design and Discovery of Novel Pharmaceutical using Semi-Supervised Learning in Large Molecular Databases. www.drugmining.com, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, USA, 2003.
42. H. van de Waterbeemd. Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design. VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1995.
43. H.-J. Bohm and G. Schneider. Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
44. rd ed., Philadelphia, USA, 1995.
45. V. Gillet, D. Wild, P. Willett and J. Bradshaw. Similarity and Dissimilarity Methods for Processing Chemical Structure Databases. The Computer Journal, 1998, 41 (8), pp. 547-558.
46. R. W. Kennard and L. A. Stone. Computer Aided Design of Experiments. Technomet., 1969, 11, pp. 137-148.
47. M. J. J. Scott, M. Niranjan and R. W. Prager. Realisable Classifiers: Improving Operating Performance on Variable Cost Problems. British Machine Vision Conference, Southampton, UK, 1998.
48. B. W. Matthews. Comparison of the Predicted and Observed Secondary Structure of T4 Phage Lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1975, 405, pp. 442-451.
49. SPSS. Clementine v5.1. http://www.spss.com, 1999.
50. Mathworks. Matlab v6. http://www.mathworks.com, 1999.
51. T. Jaakkola, M. Diekhans and D. Haussler. Using the Fisher Kernel Method to Detect Remote Protein Homologies, In T. Lengauer, R. Schneider, P. Bork, D. Brutlag, J. Glasgow, H. W. Mewes and R. Zimmer, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, AAAI Press, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999, pp. 149-158.
52. T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
53. B. Scholkopf, K. Sung, C. Burges, F. Girosi, P. Niyogi, T. Poggio and V. Vapnik. Comparing Support Vector Machines with Gaussian Kernels to Radial Basis Function Classifiers. IEEE Trans. Sign. Processing, 1997, 45, pp. 2758-2765.