Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 203-209

  Butterfield, K J ^a   Dagenais, Marie ^b   Clokie, Cameron ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; JAW; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY;

EID: 0031203561     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90070-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nishimura I, Hosokawa R, Atwood D. The knife-edge tendency in mandibular residual ridges in women. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:820-6.
2. Engelmann MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:467-73.
3. Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1995; 15:269-83.
4. Poon C-K, Barss TK, Murdoch-Kinch CA, Bricker SL, Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants: Part 1. A modified imaging technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:246-50.
5. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontal 1993;64:1243-9.
6. Littleton JT, Durizch ML. The "linear" tomogram. In: Sectional imaging methods: a comparison. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1983. p. 3-16.
7. Ashkinazy LR. Tomography in implantology. J Oral Implant 1982;10:100-18.
8. Fernandes RJ, Azarbal M, Ismail YH, Curtin HD. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and tomography: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:239-50.
9. Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8.
10. Knoernschild KL, Aquilino SA, Ruprecht A. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:239-50.
11. Kassebaum DK, Stoller NH, Goshorn BI. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites. Gen Dent 1992;12:502-5.
12. Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Implant radiology. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:645-67.
13. Lee SY, Morgano SM. A diagnostic stent for endosseous implants to improve conventional tomographic radiographs. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:482-5.
14. Silverstein LH, Melkonian RW, ΩKurtzman D, Garnick JJ, Lefkove MD. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites. J Oral Implant 1994;20:111-7.
15. Hendee WR. Medical radiation physics. 2d ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1979. p. 172-3.
16. Kassebaum DK, Reader CM, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE. Localization of anatomic structures before endodontic surgery with tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:610-3.
17. Miller CS, Numminkoski PV, Barnett DA, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:791-7.
18. Ismail YH, Azarbal M, Kapa SF. Conventional linear tomography: protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:153-7.
19. Carlton RR, Adler AM. Tomography. In: Principles of radiographic imaging: an art and a science. Delmar Publishers, 1992:573-87.
20. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implant 1990;16:156-64.
21. Kassebaum DK, Stoller NH, McDavid WD, Goshorn B, Ahrens CR. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:502-9.
22. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Grondahl K, Grondahl H-G. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:13-7.
23. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:123-7.
24. Del Balso AM. Maxillofacial imaging. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 613.
25. Littleton JT, Winter FS. Linear laminagraphy: a simple geometric interpretation of its clinical limitations. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 1965;95:981-91.
26. Littleton JT. A phantom method to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a tomographic device. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther 1970;108:847-56.
27. Littleton JT. Physical principles. In: Tomography: physical principles and clinical applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1976. p. 33-94.